LawBeat Profile picture
Jun 24 16 tweets 9 min read
BREAKING The #SupremeCourt while dismissing the plea challenging clean chit to @narendramodi in Gujarat Riot case has observed that the proceedings have been pursued for last 16 years to keep the pot boiling, OBVIOUSLY FOR ULTERIOR DESIGN.
BREAKING: The #SupremeCourt has held that “all those involved in such abuse of process, need to be in the dock and proceeded with in accordance with law.”
The court has observed “it appears
to us that a coalesced effort of the of DISGRUNTLED OFFICIALS OF the State of Gujarat along with others was to CREATE SENSATION by making REVELATIONS WHICH WERE FALSE TO THEIR OWN KNOWLEDGE” #NarendraModi #SupremeCourt
The court has also observed that “The FALSITY OF
THEIR CLAIMS had been FULLY EXPOSED by the SIT after a thorough investigation.” #SupremeCourt #NarendraModi
On challenge to the Court appointed SIT’s investigation the court has held that “we find
such submission as not only far-fetched and an attempt to undo and undermine the industry of the SIT. IT IS IN THE NATURE of QUESTIONING THE WISDOM OF THE #SupremeCourt
BREAKING: The court has held that “there is NO indication about the PERCEIVABLE LINK to show hatching of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AT the HIGHEST LEVEL for causing and precipitating mass violence across the State against the MINORITY COMMUNITY during the relevant period.”@narendramodi
The #SupremeCourt has REJECTED @Tehelka sting operation evidence noting that it “is NOT A FINAL DETERMINATION
regarding the evidentiary value thereof. We say so because the same will have to be dealt with in appropriate proceedings, in particular.”
The #SupremeCourt has observed that “the present proceedings have been pursued for last 16 years from submission of complaint in 2006 including with the AUDACITY TO QUESTION the INTEGRITY OF EVERY FUNCTIONARY involved" #NarendraModi
The #SupremeCourt has said that SIT has taken up the investigation objectivity and dispassionately the satisfaction of this Court and the argument by petitioners was bordering on undermining the integrity and sincerity of the members of the SIT.
#NarendraModi
The #SupremeCourt has noted that “The question of further investigation would have arisen only on the availability of new material/information, however NO SUCH INFORMATION IS FORTHCOMING.” @narendramodi #GujaratRiots2002
BREAKING: The #SupremeCourt has held that “We find force in the argument of #Gujarat that the testimony of Sanjiv Bhatt, Haren Pandya and also of R.B. Sreekumar WAS ONLY TO SENSATIONALISE and POLITICISE the matters in issue, although, REPLETE WITH FALSEHOOD.” @narendramodi
With regard to @sanjivbhatt claim the court has observed “For, persons not privy to the meeting where utterances were allegedly made by @narendramodi , falsely claimed themselves to be eye-witnesses and after thorough investigation by SIT, it has become clear that it is false.”
The #SupremeCourt has observed that “On such false claim, the structure of larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level has been erected. The same stands collapsed like a house of cards, aftermath thorough investigation by the SIT.”
BREAKING: #SupremeCourt observed “The protagonists of quest for justice sitting in a comfortable environment in their air-conditioned office may succeed in connecting failures of the State administration little knowing or even referring to
the ground realities.”
BREAKING: The #SupremeCourt on the protest petition filed by Zakia Jafri against closure report of the SIT has remarked ““She was obviously doing so under dictation of someone.” @narendramodi #GujaratRiots #NarendraModi
Gujarat Riots: Supreme Court Wraps Knuckles On Abuse Of Process, Says Protest Litigation Pursued Under "Dictation Of Someone"
@sai_prasad_law's brief #GujaratRiots2002
lawbeat.in/top-stories/gu…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Jun 23
#SupremeCourt will shortly hear a plea by alleged conman Sukash Chandrashekar seeking transfer from Tihar Jail.
Basant, Sr. Adv, appears for Chandrashekar. He says Chandrashekar was arrested in 2017. This is not a petition for bail or quashing, it is only a petition to shift to any other jail. The authorities in Tihar are extorting money and he has been assaulted.
Basant says that ED says bribe was paid. Chandrashekar says it was extortion.

Court: Whatever be it, money was paid?

Basant: Majority of the cases are in Bengaluru, the court can consider. But he maybe transferred to any other jail.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 23
PIL in #DelhiHighCourt seeks direction to change Call Sign VT written on Indian Aircrafts which stands for Victorian Territory and Viceroy Territory, (a legacy of British Raj) in order to secure Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Right to Freedom and Dignity.
Advocate @AshwiniUpadhyay
It submits that the prefix marks that the aircraft has been registered in the country and it is mandatory in all countries.
Upadhyay further submits that Britain set the prefix 'VT' for all the colonies in 1929. But countries like China, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka changed their Call Signs after independence. While in India, the prefix has remained on the aircraft even after 93 years
Read 4 tweets
Jun 23
BREAKING: The #MadrasHighCourt holds a midnight hearing in a matter pertaining to #AIADMK General Council meeting to be held today. The plea was filed to restrain the council from passing any resolution on unitary leadership in the party. #OPSvsEPS
Presently, the affairs of the party are helmed by O. Panneerselvan and Edapadi Palanisamy as joint coordinators. However a section of the party intended to pass a resolution to bring unitary leadership. #OPSvsEPS
A Single Judge had refused to restrain General Council from amending the bylaws to make way for unitary leadership. The order was passed late evening on Wednesday (June 22, 2022). This order was challenged before the division bench of the court. #OPSvsEPS
Read 4 tweets
Jun 22
Uttar Pradesh Government in it's response to the application filed by Jamiat-I-Hind against #Demolition drive of UP Government said, demolition carried out by Kanpur and Prayagraj Development Authority strictly in compliance with UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
Earlier, the apex court had refused to intervene in Uttar Pradesh demolitions. Court had refused to grant stay as sought in applications filed against demolitions of properties in Prayagraj and Kanpur and directed authorities to follow due process of law.
lawbeat.in/top-stories/su…
Affidavit filed by the Uttar Pradesh Government submits that the Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind have cherry picked a few incidents and has attempted to give a mala fide colour to the lawful action.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 21
BREAKING: The #BombayHighCourt has directed that student Nikhil Bhamre be released on bail. He was arrested for posting an alleged derogatory tweet against Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Sharad Pawar. #NCP
Earlier, the #BombayHighCourt had condemned the #Maharashtra government for keeping the 22 year old , Nikhil Bhamre in jail for over a month.

lawbeat.in/top-stories/wh…
According to sources, Bhamare was arrested on May 14, 2022 and has been in custody ever since for posting the alleged objectionable tweet. He has been ordered to be released after nearly 38 days in custody. #BombayHighCourt #Nikhilbhamre
Read 4 tweets
Jun 21
PIL in Supreme Court seeks removal of defence chiefs, General Manoj Pande, Air Chief Marshal VR
Chaudhari, and Admiral R Hari Kumar
from service for allegedly giving statements to electronic medias, TV and social medias
violating the Army Rules 1954 over #AgnipathScheme.
The plea submits, "That Rule 21 states that no person who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 shall publish in any form or communicate
to the press any matter in relation to a political question
or on a service subject without the prior sanction of the Central Government."
The plea filed by Advocate CR Jaya Sukin further adds that the rule also prohibits such persons from
delivering a lecture, on a matter relating to a political question or on a service subject without government’s
prior sanction.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(