A small thread pertaining to Amber Heard's alleged talks with publishers to write/publish a 'Tell-All' book, which more than likely would be about Johnny Depp, as that's sadly what would sell to consumers. If you disagree, just look at OJ Simpson's 'If I Did It."
First, we don't have credible evidence Ms. Heard is actually publishing a 'Tell-All,' nor do we know if a publisher is in discussions with her for a 'Tell-All."
Second, with regard to a publisher, Mr. Depp won his civil lawsuit for defamation against Ms. Heard, so...
any publishing houses, publishers, in publishing a 'Tell-All,' would be strictly liable for disseminating defamatory material because their assumption of responsibilities in preparing and communicating the material to the public.
Third, a 'Tell-All' by Ms. Heard would be...
in direct violation of the confidentiality agreement which Ms. Heard signed in the divorce settlement with Mr. Depp, which specifies neither can speak, write anything with regard to their relationship, marriage or anything that occurred within outside a court of law.
Fourth,...
a 'Tell-All' written by Ms. Heard would be a republication of defamatory statements, of malicious false allegations, which a jury unanimously awarded him compensatory & punitive damages. She would be opening herself to another defamation lawsuit, a possible injunction, &...
because Mr. Depp already has a civil judgement against Ms. Heard, he could choose to do what Ron Goldman's family did, when OJ Simpson wrote 'If I Did It.'
The rights to OJ Simpson's book, 'If I Did It,' a first-person account of how he would have committed the murders had...
he committed them, were awarded to the Goldman family in Aug. 2007. They were granted the proceeds from the book in 2007 as part of the multi-million-dollar civil jury award against him they had been trying to collect for over a decade. They own the copyright, media rights,...
and movie rights. They also acquired OJ Simpson's name, likeness, life story, and right of publicity in connection with the book, according to court documents, ensuring he would not be able to profit from the book.
Fifth, Mr. Depp has options if there is any merit to the...
purported reports Ms. Heard is discussing with publishers a multi-million-dollar deal to write a 'Tell-All,' about her relationship, marriage, and her malicious false allegations, after he unanimously won against her in Virginia.
Sixth, just keep in mind, Ms. Heard's PR &...
the mainstream media in the past have made up fictious stories of films she's been attached/signed to, as well, and this may just be a PR/media ploy. #JOHNNYDEPPWINS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Roberta Kaplan, Amber Heard's former attorney, who co-founded the #TimesUp legal defense fund in the wake of the #MeToo movement, submitted her resignation in August 2021, after nefarious conduct in the organization was revealed. She still supports Amber Heard.
Roberta Kaplan & the author of this heinous opinion piece Jessica Bennett are misandrists/4th-wave feminists with a political agenda that discounts a male victim of abuse, Johnny Depp, & the malicious false allegations a unanimous jury found defamatory.
Ms. Heard, whether Ms. Kaplan or Ms. Bennett want to accept it, via evidence was proven to be the sole perpetrator of domestic violence & malicious false allegations. Ms. Heard deserves the public outrage she is enduring for what she's done. She should be held accountable.
Update Fairfax, Virginia: Johnny Depp v Amber Heard
6/23/2022 Defendant's Notice of Filing (pertaining to the corrected transcript & supplemental plea in bar exhibit): fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/…
Update Fairfax, Virginia: Johnny Depp v Amber Heard
6/17/2022 Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Intervene (TMZ's attempt to prohibit Morgan Tremaine from testifying during the trial): fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/…
Arkansas wrongfully convicted 3 young men for the murders of Michael Moore, Christopher Byers, & Stevie Branch. Johnny Depp & others worked tirelessly to free them. Now, when the crime could be solved, justice is thwarted once again by the state of Arkansas.
Due to the dubious nature of the evidence, the suspected presence of emotional bias in court, the case generated widespread controversy & was the subject of several documentaries. Celebrities & musicians held fundraisers to support efforts to free the men.
In July 2007, new forensic evidence was presented. A report jointly issued by the state/defense team stated, 'Although most of the genetic material recovered from the scene was attributable to the victims of the offenses, some of it cannot be attributed to either the victims...
Amber Heard gave an exclusive interview to Savannah Gutherie. It's vital imho, we refute her malicious narrative, since the mainstream media refuses to do so. This thread will deal with the FULL Dateline interview that aired 6/17/22 & facts to refute her comments.
Since some have asked for a Non direct link to Ms. Heard's exclusive FULL Dateline interview w/ Savannah Gutherie, I'm providing it here. My comments will follow in the thread below. Please feel free to add your own thoughts, own evidence.
I've written 3 threads on Ms. Heard's Dateline interview w/ Savannah Guthrie previously, which I will attach here, so I don't have to address Ms. Heard continued malicious lies, redundantly, b/ only new comments.
Thread 1:
Kosha Gada: [Amber Heard's] on a rehab tour of her public opinion because she has lost on every front. She lost legally. She lost in the court of public opinion. And her career has taken a hit & it is going to be very interesting to see what happens next...."
Kosha Gada: 'The tactic [Amber Heard] is employing here is predictable, which she is trying to extract herself from the specifics of this case & she's trying to speak in general generalities; it's about the MeToo movement; it's about Freedom of Speech; it's about someone being...
@aburkhartlaw has addresses potential recourse for Johnny Depp in this video pertaining to Ms. Heard's Today show/Dateline exclusive interviews in which she continues her malicious false allegations, despite a unanimous jury verdict, in Mr. Depp's favor.
I'm going to address some of the "key" points of Ms. Burkhart's video below, so those in the Depp support community that don't speak English, will have an opportunity to translate them & understand.
Thank you @aburkhartlaw for your time & legal insights. It's much appreciated.🙏
An injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or cease doing a specific action. If a person violates an injunction they can be held in contempt of court.
Contempt of court is the disobedience of an order of a court, which can be quite serious.