For a 9 sigma drop in birth rates to have happened in Jan-Mar 2022, something dramatic had to have happened to stop pregnancies occurring in March to June 2021.
I wonder what that could be?
Were couples depressed? Looking to move house? Too busy?
In general birth rates are surprisingly stable year-to-year with long term cycles. There are seasonal peaks and troughs which are pretty reliable. Every midwife knows.
But this is well outside normal.
Big red arrow time.
It definitely has nothing to do with the the fact, that, rather than staying at the site of injection as promised, their own data showed that the LNPs not only distributed to the ovaries and testes but accumulated.
I must give credit to @mkeulemans for pointing out an error in my chart.
I have had to recreate it as the first years' data incorrect.
Here is the corrected chart.
I should have spotted this because the stability of the data was too pronounced. But remember that there was a significant influx of migration to Germany in those years 2011-2015, so we need to look at the stable years 2016-2021 and compare.
Errors bars are SD (2016-21)
The average monthly birth figure
for Q1 2016 - 2021 is 61873.
The SD is 678.
The Q1 2022 the figure is 54871.
The drop is 7002.
That is 10.3 sigma.
It's worse.
So, apologies for not triple checking my data and thanks again to eagle eyed critics for the correction.
I'd like to say that it changes the rest of the thread, and that there is no problem here - but it doesn't and there is.
I was looking for this so thank you @NicolienvGelder data showing how the younger population expanded in Germany from 2011- 2015.
Hence why you can't use those years reliably in calculating SD for this purpose (unless you wanted to hide something)
Because @realDonaldTrump has shown a chink in his "best vaccine ever" narrative the deep state is in panic mode so are rolling out the limited hangouts.
See next tweet for explanation.
This "reveal" from David Martin is not what it seems
David Martin sounds knowledgeable - and he is - but his sensationalism is intentional because it will be dismissed by the people who need to be persuaded. He will occupy your time with patent drivel and nothing new will emerge.
It's intentional because that's his role
Just like Stew Peters, Sasha Latypova, Jane Ruby, Ana Mihalcea, Mike Yeadon, Joe Sansone and a few others with the "graphene in the jabs" "viruses don't exist" "jabs are bioweapons" rhetoric.
It's intended to sound crazy.
It's a smart move because there is underlying truth
The Pharma lobby group BIO admitting to using "conservative" lobby groups to attempt to oust @SecKennedy to keep the vaccine industry alive.
Important highlights:
⭐️Targeting @DrMakaryFDA to "rebuild FDA capacity"
⭐️Target @AEI via Scott Gottlieb and @DLA_Piper via Richard Burr
⭐️Help build trust in vaccines (what happened to the trust?)
⭐️Investors are leaving vaccine investment
⭐️Vaccines are the #1 priority at BIO
⭐️National security commission Biotech report a way in to sell product
⭐️$2m to be spent on "vaccine programs"
⭐️"More productive to target Makary and Trump Insiders vs RFK Jr"
Remember that BIO are the organisation that funded and organised the @shotsheard harassment group that target doctors for deregistration (e.g. @mdbreathe and @drcole12) if they publish genuine safety concerns about pharma products.
Links below.
Social media targeting, harassment and blackmail is absolutely securities fraud. law.justia.com/codes/us/2002/… and others
@SECGov @FBIDirectorKash do your job.
Remember that the BIO lobby group Shots Heard - which targeted doctors and scientists to blackmail them into silence over COVID vaccines - included people like Viki Male, Kevin Ault (ACIP), David Gorski and Dorit Reiss.
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.
But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.
It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.
There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death)
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.