Neeraj Kishan Kaul appearing for #Eknath_Shinde : Till the issue of removal of Deputy Speaker is decided, he will not proceed with the disqualification of members. Many political considerations will come into the matter. It will destroy spirit of the constitution.
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : Majority is who we represent. We have 39 MLAs today. Minority is subverting. A Party spokesperson says 40 bodies will arrive from Guwahati. #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : Atmosphere is not favourable to pursue a litigation before #BombayHighCourt . It is for the sake of convenience. The court has deal with such litigation under Article 32.
Court: We understand you are apprehensive of life and liberty.
Court: Also the lack of reasonable time to respond to the notice.
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : The speaker or Dy Speaker his disqualification is decided. If a Dy speaker whose very own existence is in doubt, removes people who are in favour disqualification are removed.
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : There are two important things. In 2019, Shinde was unanimously appointed as a party leader. In 2022, a minority holds suo motto meeting and issues notice to MLAs. The Dy Speaker should have refrained, he approves the appointment
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : On 22nd they ask us to attend a meeting in the evening. On 23rd, they move a disqualification petition before Speaker. On 25th the Dy Speaker sends me the notice giving me two days to respond.
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : Kindly have Article 179 of the Constitution please read Rule 11 of #Maharashtra legislative assembly . So once a notice for removal of speaker is given, 14 days time is to be given. This has not been done. What is being done now is with undue haste
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : Speaker has no authority to deal with matters like this till his removal is decided. Notice is the starting point of the dy speaker's removal. He is seized of it. Given this situation, he cannot get into the issue of disqualification of MLAs
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : How can the Dy speaker initiate proceedings and go ahead with disqualification of MLAs.
Court: Lets have the other side argue.
Dr. AM Singhvi for the chief whip and leader of the house.
SG objects and says Dy Speaker arguments must be heard first.
Singhvi : How can you decide who is to argue first?
Court: We will first Dr.Dhavan first, he appears for the Dy Speaker.
Singhvi: Let me respond first.
Singhvi: The first point that the court is cleverly and delightfully unanswered. The question was why they have not approached #BombayHighCourt . This was a threshold. Is HC not capable of answering this question? Just because something coming in the press, one cannot leapfrog.
Singhvi for #Shivsena : There is no reason why the High Court cannot hear. Not one single case has the court acted with the Dy Speaker is seized of the matter.
Singhvi: A judgment holds that a direction by the court cannot be given.
Court: The Principle issue is, where a notice for removal of speaker has been issued, whether such speaker is competent to exercise his powers ? #MaharashtraPoliticalTurmoil#Eknath_Shinde
Singhvi: A judgment of this court says, all internal decisions of the speaker are barred from scrutiny. It cannot be called into question.
Singhvi: In this case, vide press reports, these MLAs sent this notice from an unknown, unverified email send an email saying they have no confidence. The validity of the notice is under doubt.
Court: Can a speaker himself decide on the validity of the notice? #Eknath_Shinde
Court: We have a constitution bench judgment before us saying something very similar to the facts of the case.
Singhvi: The notice has been sent through invalid means, the Dy Speaker has not taken it on record. It was not given in person.
Singhvi: On 20th these MLAs went to Surat, on 21st they send an unverified email. The notice has to become only after 14 days. It has not become life in this case.
Kaul for #Eknath_Shinde : We have sent the notice in person.
Kamat: The whole no confidence bogey is unsanctioned by the constitution. As far as the removal of speakers is concerned, removal is used because there has to be cause. Majority is not a ground to seek disqualification.
Court: If on the basis of the charge only Speaker or Dy Speaker should be removed. The person who is seeking disqualification will be condemned! He will be removed. It will have far reaching consequences.
Court: Sometimes, haste also unnecessarily give undesirable consequences.
Dhavan: Let them come milord. Its just a hearing.
Court: How soon can the reply be filed?
ORDER : Issue notice. Dr. Rajiv Dhawan accepts notice of Dy Speaker. The service is waived off. Counter affidavit to be filed in 5 days. Rejoinder in 3 days thereafter. List for further consideration on 11th July.
Court: We are only trying to balance the competing claims and ensure status quo continues. All the issues you raise will be determined by us.
ORDER: LIST THE MATTER ON JULY 11, 2022. MEANWHILE THE TIME GRANTED BY DY SPEAKER TO SUBMIT THEIR WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS TODAY BE EXTENDED TILL JULY 11, 2022. The petitioners are other MLAS shall be at liberty to submit their replies without prejudice to their rights.
Dhawan: At least the proceedings before the speaker be proceeded with milords.
Kaul for #EkanathShinde : In the meantime, these proceedings should be in abeyance.
Kaul for #EkanathShinde : There are serious threats to our property and persons. At least the protection be provided.
Order: Counsel for Maharashtra states that steps have been taken maintain law and order and to protect the life and property of all 39 MLAs and their family members.
BREAKING: #SupremeCourt extends till July 11, 2022 the time granted to #EknathShinde and other MLAs to file a response to Deputy Speaker’s disqualification notice. Court to hear the matter on July 11, 2022.
Having heard Ld. Sr. Counsel for the applicant and Mr.SG and we allow the applicants to participate in the special session of the State Legislative assembly, scheduled to be held tomorrow. Since they are in custody pursuant to cases registered by ED
Order:
CBI and ED are directed to escort them to Vidhan Sabha and once the proceedings are over, they shall be brought back to judicial custody.
#SupremeCourt will shortly hear the plea filed by #ShivSena Chief Whip challenging the communication issued by #Maharashtra governor calling for a floor test on June 30.
Singhvi for #SunilPrabhu: I have 7 or 8 points. Preliminary point generally the letter which tells us about the floor test says that June 28, #Devendra_Fadnavis met the governor and today at in the morning, we received this intimation. As a matter of fact, 2 NCP MLAs have #COVID
BREAKING: Details of writ petition moved by #ShivSena Chief Whip Sunil Prabhu. The plea challenges the communication of the Governor of #Maharashtra noting that it has been issued with “undue haste”resulting in manifest arbitrariness .
The plea contends that the Governor has illegally invoked Article 175(2) of the Constitution to send a message to the Assembly for conduct of a floor test, which is beyond his Constitutional authority. #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis#FloorTest#EknathSinde
The plea claims that #BJP did not take it well that the Shivsena formed the government with NCP and Congress, breaking away its alliance with the BJP. #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis#UddhavThackeray
Replug 🔌 — Supreme Court’s take on “Floor Test” ordered by Governor in Shivraj Singh Chouhan & Ors Vs. Speaker, MP assembly is relevant in light of #MaharashtraPoliticalTurmoil. Top Court’s take in 2020 was that it was well within powers of a Governor to call for a Floor Test.
Replug: Supreme Court had held that where the Governor has reasons to believe that Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister has “lost the confidence of the house”, constitutional propriety requires that “the issue be resolved by calling for a floor test” [(2020) 17 SCC 1] —
Replug: It was the Supreme Court’s view at that Where MLA’s of ruling party resigned in an expression of “lack of faith” in existing government, convening a floor test is the surest method of assessing the impact of the resignations on collective will of House [(2020) 17 SCC 1]
Dr.AM Singhvi, mentions the matter, says the floor test is illegal. He says the notice for the floor test has come just now. Furthermore asks for a hearing at 5PM or 6PM to ensure that the plea filed is complete. #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis