Glem's entire feed is of course random grievances and blaming Dems/Obama for Roe. He of course does not state a single time whether he thinks it's a good thing that Roe was overturned, just random tone-policing and out-of-context Obama/Hillary clips.
When the ruling 1st happened his immediate response (after going quiet) was to bizarrely fixate over the fact that #actually it was a 5-4 decision. Which was strange b/c..what a pedantic thing to obsess over. But then it made sense, of course, it was about blaming the Libs.
Just a standard, generic Right Winger.
Your 'principled civil libertarian,' everybody.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sigh. Ok since I guess you found my thread in one of your hourly name-searches. Here, I'll gladly lay out why you were not 'right' about everything. Not even slightly. In fact, you were and still are aggressively wrong about...pretty much everything.
Before I start, I just want to say...
Even Jeffrey Toobin wasn't this shameless about jerking off in public.
Talk about having a(n undeservedly) high opinion of yourself. Good Lord.
But back to the topic you're replying to; you claim to somehow be proven 'right' that the Dems needed to do a 'lightning' impeachment the day of to 'strike while the iron was hot' or something. And by waiting a week, they totally blew and it's their fault bla bla bla.
None of those hysterical libs will ever face any accountability for being wrong. Now to take a big sip of coffee and turn off every single news source...
Hosts a podcast with Jamelle Bouie. Ahh ok, that explains it.
Again...these delusional people (in the groupchat with Will "diaper" Stancil) never are able to explain away: Mitch McConnell controlling the Senate or which 10 other GOP votes were going to flip. Just straight to 'THEY BLEW IT.' Clown shit.
Since it's (Dem) primary day here in PA and I haven't really talked much about it, I thought I would just share some general thoughts/analysis, which is mostly about the #PASEN race b/c that's about all that's actually going on.
First off, I expect the turnout to be pretty low for the Dems (and high on the GOP side). People are just not paying much attention at all on the Dem side. Partly due to post-Trump fatigue, partly due to the lack of competitive races. If it's low turnout Dem/high turnout GOP/
the analysts will probably act as if it's some major warning sign of lack of enthusiasm for the general, but I don't buy it. The General election it's own ball-game with it's own major stakes. People will turn out for that once the differences are clear.
The thing about this is even back in 2014, Glenn couldn't bring himself to admit that Russia was invading Ukraine. Couldn't even say 1 'bad' thing about what they were doing. But of course, despite absolutely 0 proof, he tried to whatabout it to make it about "US interference."
*everyone fairly straightforwardly says that Russia is in Crimea*
Me, a bold adversarial 'anti-war' journalist: Wow, that is such an unfair thing to say. Where's your outrage about the US *not* invading Ukraine, huh?
Of course it would be fairly interesting to go through his old tweets at the time of the first Russian invasion, but naturally, as any transparency-advocate does, he has mass deleted all his old tweets to avoid any accountability. Bold.
All these people like Adam are still salty because he accurately called out the terrible slogan that is "defund the police", which they still can't admit was a mega loser. So instead, you get a bunch of extremely weird character attacks like this.
Lamb's probably not going to win because nobody's paying attention and Fetterman has (relatively) high name recognition, but good lord this is just pathetic.