1st-generation #GMO crops were introduced over 20 years ago with the same promises of pesticide reductions now being made for #newGMO crops. Due to the adoption of GMO herbicide-tolerant crops in the US herbicide use from 1996-2011 INCREASED by an estimated 239M kg—239000 tonnes!
In Argentina🇦🇷after #GMO herbicide-tolerant soy was authorised in 1996, they saw a 60% increase in herbicide use (figures 2000-2014) with accompanying reports of increased rates of cancers and birth defects friendsoftheearth.eu/wp-content/upl…#GMOs
Brazil🇧🇷: GMO herbicide-tolerant soy authorised 2003. Overall pesticide use went up 1.6-fold 2000-2012 & use on soybeans increased 3-fold (i.e. 300%!!). Brazil’s National Cancer Institute condemned #GMO crops for helping make 🇧🇷 the largest consumer of agrochemicals in the world!
Don't get fooled again: #GMO promoters claim that new (gene-edited) GMOs are different from 1st-generation #GMOs and they will reduce pesticide use. But many #newGMO crops currently in the commercialisation pipeline are designed to increase herbicide use☠️ friendsoftheearth.eu/wp-content/upl…
CIBUS is a leader in the development of new #GMOs. They say, "Our goal is a whole new generation of herbicide traits across the major crop platforms" and "the approval of gene editing techs will open up one of the biggest opportunities in agriculture"—new markets for these crops.
CIBUS says the approval of gene-edited crops will open the door to:
☠️The large number of countries that haven't previously allowed #GMO traits for herbicide tolerance;
☠️The large number of crops that haven't had GMO traits for herbicide tolerance before. #DontGetFooledAgain
CIBUS also says, "The impact of these new herbicide tolerance traits is expected to mirror the dramatic impact #GMO crop protection traits for herbicide tolerance had on farming."
Remember: that "dramatic impact" included MASSIVE INCREASES in herbicide use. #DontGetFooledAgain
It doesn't matter whether it's old-fashioned GMOs or gene-edited #GMOs that are creating herbicide-tolerant crops, they will both end in greater pesticide use, a pesticide treadmill for farmers, and a further deepening of the biodiversity crisis that threatens our food security.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Concerning Rise of #GMO Food Animals theepochtimes.com/the-concerning… A quiet effort is underway to maximize profits by manipulating the genes of food animals
The FDA briefing packet for GMO salmon revealed a higher incidence of “jaw erosion” and infection; a possible increase in the level of insulin-like growth factor-1; and no way to determine if greater allergy risks existed because of the excessive culling of “abnormal” #GMO salmon
Moreover, FDA food scientists and outside experts who were called in for hearings on the GMO salmon noted unexplained discrepancies, omitted data, and overall substandard science presented by those promoting AquaBounty's #GMO salmon centerforhealthjournalism.org/2012/12/26/gen…
Advisory body deals blow to UK gene editing plans foodingredientsfirst.com/news/advisory-… “Not fit for purpose,” is the response from the UK Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) to govt attempts to deregulate food editing of crops and animals. #GMOs
The RPC gives a “red” (or failing) grade to the UK govt regarding the new gene-editing bill’s impact on businesses. It also says more discussion is needed on “impacts, labeling & traceability”. It also says that consumer sentiment toward gene-editing has to be further considered
The RPC says the govt’s impact assessment didn’t rely on independent evaluations: “Much of the evidence re risk discussed in the impact assessment is drawn from interested parties, or based on scientific trials that don't replicate real-world conditions (incl farmers’ behavior).”
💣 If you haven't yet read this @Fakir_ article, now is the time!
We learn how a journalist wrote articles under false identities to influence public opinion, including articles aimed at discrediting @IARCWHO after it classified #glyphosate as a probable carcinogen 🧐
@Fakir_@IARCWHO These ghostwritten pieces on #glyphosate contain the usual pesticide lobby talking points:
👉Comparison with table salt
👉Glyphosate prevents world hunger
👉@IARCWHO's view is at odds with regulatory agencies
👉Suspect links with environmental groups
The Bill's exemption from regulation of certain #GMOs is very wide, applying to ALL plants (not just crops), including algae, wild plants & trees, and ALL multiple-celled animals, including pets, farmed and wild animals, some of which are highly mobile (e.g. fish and insects).
Exempt #GMOs (such as forestry trees, pets or wild animals, including insects) will not be required to have ANY environmental risk assessment before open release into the environment, and there is NO provision to stop, destroy or clean-up such releases if anything goes wrong.
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Bayer bid to nix Roundup weedkiller suits uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/u-supreme… The Supreme Court's action dealt a blow to Bayer as the company maneuvers to limit its legal liability in thousands of cases. #glyphosate
The decision frustrates Bayer’s plan to stem the wave of litigation it has faced since its $63bn takeover of #Monsanto. More than 30,000 claims remain outstanding, for which Bayer set aside $4.5bn in addition to the approximately $11.5bn Bayer had already been forced to set aside
Last month, Bayer’s stock fell 6.2% the day after the Biden administration recommended the Supreme Court decline to hear Bayer’s appeal. That move by the U.S. Justice Department appeared to diminish the chances of the court hearing the case wsj.com/articles/supre…#glyphosate
German ministry warns on risks of new #GMO products gmwatch.org/en/106-news/la… And even the European Commission's representative expects gene-edited organisms will be traceable and labelled. #GMOs
The German environment minister @SteffiLemke emphasised that there's no need to regulate new #GMOs differently. But she said if new regulation is introduced in the EU, we need risk assessment and mandatory labelling (both of which are missing from #GMO deregulation in the UK)
@SteffiLemke The German environment minister also warned that that new GMO techniques (involving gene editing) have unintended effects, that new #GMO products may pose risks for health and the environment, and that the claimed benefits are not proven: "There is a high risk of greenwashing."