The still-seething weeb bitterness is both real and comedic af π€£
(The person responding to Josh is the leader of the fan club for Vic Mignogna, a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R Kelly of Anime)
Yiiiiikes
I can't imagine having a life so unfulfilled that I'd devote every waking moment to a pedo
The Foodraiser got an award from a local nonprofit, @JoshMartinVoice tweeted about it, and Squally was Definitely Not Madβ’ in his @'s within 8 minutes
Doubly funny considering we ended up with -0- sick children, but the amount of peanut butter we bought was big enough that JIF reached out directly to offer to cover any medical bills
I "receive the total credit for everyone else's work" (by accepting a plaque that says Mrs. Parker's Professors Foodraiser, does she think I'm Mrs. Parker?). She also doesn't seem to understand how the tax system works π€¦ββοΈ
Vic's gonna end up filing another LOLsuit and I'll have to add Boozy to the wiffle bat list π
**NEW FIIIIIIIIIIILINGS**
I don't want to spoil it though so I'll let other folks go first π
Mike's thread is below
Translation: Vic Mignogna β a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime β got BTFO'd out of the appeals court and went 0-17 again
*Plus* lost the bonus Rial-Toye cross-appeal on fees
If you thought Vic Mignogna getting *thoroughly* BTFO'd by the appeals court today would get his fans to have some perspective on his perving, you would be wrong:
For folks who want to read the opinion where the 2nd Court of Appeals laughs repeatedly at Vic Mignogna and his muppet LOLyers, I put the docs on Dropbox: dropbox.com/sh/mx83p1h3mrjβ¦
Not over yet. There's a remand on the attorney fees, and Percy can always try to appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas to keep the grift going a bit longer
New banner for the occasion btw, courtesy of @Emm_Initiative
"Hey Siri, how can you tell when an anime voice actor is a sexual predator and pedophile?"
This case is like a whole lesson on legal malpractice π
Yes. I staked out the position that it would be successful (screenshot below), a couple other folks did too IIRC, but it was definitely a minority view
This passage and footnote roughly translates to "there were a lot more reasons why Vic Mignogna was going to get BTFO'd, but his LOLyer Ty Beard was so incompetent we won't get into all that":
Yep. The appeals court goes out of its way to meticulously document the variety of ways Ty Beard f*cked up Vic Mignogna's already-losing case
Also: feel like I owe an obligatory apology to all the folks who follow me because of [infosec | ShotSpotter LOLetry | police misconduct | #SilentSham | DUI Dan] now having their TLs flooded with tweets about the Vic Mignogna LOLsuit π¬π¬
Remember back in the first week when the CHUDlets were all "she tweeted a letter, that's defamation! Greg told her she could, that's unauthorized practice of law!"? ππ
The facts in the 303 case were stipulated, meaning both sides agreed to them and the Court is required to take them as true for purposes of making its decision
You can have a judgment set aside under Rule 60(b)(2) for "newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered"
But β as the media coverage shows β that evidence *could* have been discovered with reasonable diligence
2/2 @H2OMocassin
There's no fraud when the State of Colorado agreed to it
Even if were, the deadline for a Rule 60(b)(3) motion to set aside for fraud would have been 1 year after the trial court's ruling -- so that deadline already passed back in 2018