T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Jul 2, 2022 β€’ 88 tweets β€’ 28 min read β€’ Read on X
This presents an ethical quandary: does it count as "letting the Threadnought die" if you actively kill it? πŸ€”
Oh they've never stopped, I just mute every new subthread I'm added on until someone gets adventurous and @'s me in a new one
"A Scummy Situation from Top to Bottom" is the name of Vic Mignogna's biography
The still-seething weeb bitterness is both real and comedic af 🀣

(The person responding to Josh is the leader of the fan club for Vic Mignogna, a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R Kelly of Anime) Image
Yiiiiikes

I can't imagine having a life so unfulfilled that I'd devote every waking moment to a pedo
The fun part is that I had no clue who any of these people were on 5 June 2019, but they have been obsessively mad at me for **three whole years now**

Meanwhile, I've gotten married, bought a house, got a Texas law license, got a promotion at work, helped feed 5K+ kids 2x/yr...
The Foodraiser got an award from a local nonprofit, @JoshMartinVoice tweeted about it, and Squally was Definitely Not Madβ„’ in his @'s within 8 minutes
Doubly funny considering we ended up with -0- sick children, but the amount of peanut butter we bought was big enough that JIF reached out directly to offer to cover any medical bills
Can confirm

I learned a valuable lesson from all that: you can never overestimate the incompetence of Percy and Screech
Squally is still going πŸ˜‚

I "receive the total credit for everyone else's work" (by accepting a plaque that says Mrs. Parker's Professors Foodraiser, does she think I'm Mrs. Parker?). She also doesn't seem to understand how the tax system works πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Vic Mignogna has the best fans ImageImage
After 3+ years I'm not *surprised* that Vic Mignogna attracts morons, but it never stops being amusing just the same πŸ˜‚
Just be careful b/c brain worms are contagious and her case is terminal
Doubt they'd even let me in tbh πŸ˜‚
Vic Mignogna has the best fans πŸ™ƒ
I did not. Wouldn't be surprised if the pedo just has several alts they bounce between
I see the Vic Mignogna fan who was defending child porn "art" is now defending Nazis:
Yep. Along with periodic comments on the LOLsuit even long after it was dismissed (see, e.g., )
Indeed

I'm honestly skeptical we'll ever get one at this point
I was wondering what @AkivaMCohen did to trigger the swarm of pedos who ended up in my @'s overnight -- and I'm pretty sure this did it πŸ˜‚
Doesn't really matter when the artist says "this is a 5yo" in one tweet and then talks about how f*ckable it is in the next
It's honestly hit a point where I feel like @AkivaMCohen has earned a spot on the Wiffle Bat List πŸ˜‚
Today is Day 1,168 of the Threadnought

Vic Mignogna's LOLsuit claiming people lied about him was dismissed by the court more than 2 years ago

Yet Vic's CHUDlets march on in my @'s...
Not a peep. I've given up hoping for an opinion tbh πŸ˜‚
Vic's gonna end up filing another LOLsuit and I'll have to add Boozy to the wiffle bat list πŸ˜‚
**NEW FIIIIIIIIIIILINGS**
I don't want to spoil it though so I'll let other folks go first πŸ˜‚
Mike's thread is below

Translation: Vic Mignogna – a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime – got BTFO'd out of the appeals court and went 0-17 again

*Plus* lost the bonus Rial-Toye cross-appeal on fees

Soooo he's now 0-35 overall πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
This is true, *technically* I was wrong because I somehow overestimated just how inept Ty Beard and Nick Rekieta would be πŸ˜‚
Maybe! πŸ˜‚ would also lend support to the theory that a non-zero number of 2nd Court of Appeals clerks follow me on here 🀣
If you thought Vic Mignogna getting *thoroughly* BTFO'd by the appeals court today would get his fans to have some perspective on his perving, you would be wrong:
The opinion repeatedly goes out of its way to thoroughly shit all over Ty Beard and his incompetence πŸ™ƒ
For folks who want to read the opinion where the 2nd Court of Appeals laughs repeatedly at Vic Mignogna and his muppet LOLyers, I put the docs on Dropbox:
dropbox.com/sh/mx83p1h3mrj…
Just put on Dropbox, go up one tweet from here
The trial court said Rial+Toye could only have the same amount of fees that Marchi got

The appeals court said that was improper, and they should get even more
Not over yet. There's a remand on the attorney fees, and Percy can always try to appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas to keep the grift going a bit longer
Putting a footnote of your appeals brief "compare [several hundred pages] to [several hundred other pages]" will do that πŸ˜‚

Just another reminder that Ty πŸ‘ Beard πŸ‘ doesn't πŸ‘ know πŸ‘ what πŸ‘ he's πŸ‘ doing πŸ‘
LOLOLOLOL Image
Where on earth have we heard of cases like Lane v Phares and Van Der Linden v Khan before?? πŸ€”

It's a mystery ImageImage
Can y'all imagine having your prolific history as a sexual predator documented in a publicly available appellate opinion?

Big yikes ImageImageImage
Yes

Anyone wanting to show that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and pedophile can just point folks to this appeals opinion

And if Mignogna sues anyone for defamation because they pointed out he's a sexual predator and pedophile, the defendant can cite this opinion

πŸ™ƒ
When your fans help your LOLyer torpedo your case... πŸ˜‚ ImageImage
Went ahead and made this my pinned tweet for the next few days so it's easy for y'all to find
New banner for the occasion btw, courtesy of @Emm_Initiative Image
"Hey Siri, how can you tell when an anime voice actor is a sexual predator and pedophile?" ImageImageImage
This case is like a whole lesson on legal malpractice πŸ˜‚ Image
Yes. I staked out the position that it would be successful (screenshot below), a couple other folks did too IIRC, but it was definitely a minority view Image
I co-sign this endeavor πŸ˜‚ Venmo a couple bones to @BillyBrew and force him to watch a livescreech
So much malpractice in this Vic Mignogna appeals opinion πŸ˜‚ Image
Not in anti-SLAPP jurisdictions, the cases are typically nuked before depos can happen
This passage and footnote roughly translates to "there were a lot more reasons why Vic Mignogna was going to get BTFO'd, but his LOLyer Ty Beard was so incompetent we won't get into all that": Image
Yep. The appeals court goes out of its way to meticulously document the variety of ways Ty Beard f*cked up Vic Mignogna's already-losing case
Oh this is a deep cut 🀣🀣🀣

Only the Threadnought OG's will get the reference
I think Twitter's algorithm is so tired of the Threadnought after 3 years that only a small chunk of the 100K are gonna see these tweets

May you be adequately compensated for your future suffering just the same πŸ˜‚
It's hilarious because when the Threadnought started on 6 June 2019, there were only like ~25K folks here
Also: feel like I owe an obligatory apology to all the folks who follow me because of [infosec | ShotSpotter LOLetry | police misconduct | #SilentSham | DUI Dan] now having their TLs flooded with tweets about the Vic Mignogna LOLsuit 😬😬

I'm sorry y'all
You did! He was the trial-level judge who heard the case initially
Happy to, let me know some dates πŸ‘Š
Remember back in the first week when the CHUDlets were all "she tweeted a letter, that's defamation! Greg told her she could, that's unauthorized practice of law!"? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Talk about a ride
What's the SOL on a negligent referral claim? πŸ˜‚
Had not planned it originally, but now that you mention Bojangles for lunch does sound appropriate πŸ€”

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with T. Greg Doucette

T. Greg Doucette Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @greg_doucette

Jul 2, 2023
Not here

The facts in the 303 case were stipulated, meaning both sides agreed to them and the Court is required to take them as true for purposes of making its decision

1/
You can have a judgment set aside under Rule 60(b)(2) for "newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered"

But – as the media coverage shows – that evidence *could* have been discovered with reasonable diligence

2/2
@H2OMocassin
There's no fraud when the State of Colorado agreed to it

Even if were, the deadline for a Rule 60(b)(3) motion to set aside for fraud would have been 1 year after the trial court's ruling -- so that deadline already passed back in 2018
Read 30 tweets
Jun 13, 2023
It amuses me to no end that every legal professional involved on the employees' side of this linked together via the Threadnought

It's like an honest-to-God Lawyer Voltronβ„’ assembling to disembowel the bad guy
It is f*cking *hilarious* πŸ˜‚ Esp having seen it blossom from the very beginning

I'm grateful to know them
Read 9 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
This chart explains a lot πŸ˜‚

I'm also basically alone in the bottom right quadrant πŸ˜”
Maybe. It fits well with my admittedly anecdotal view of election results nationally and locally though
Read 6 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
Love making it easier for dirty cops to stalk their victims in real-time

wral.com/story/nc-bill-…
These days it tends to be the latter

It's very "Government is good when it has a badge"
These are the cops Republicans in the NC General Assembly are trying to give new warrantless stalking powers to –

Cops committing domestic violence:

Cops committing sex crimes:

Cops committing sex crimes with children:
Read 5 tweets
Apr 26, 2023
This lawsuit is superbly written

Read it for yourself here: documentcloud.org/documents/2378…

Pour one out for the poor bastard who had to read DeKlantis's memoir for evidence though 🫑
Also, you might recall a certain lawyer mentioned the Takings Clause issue -- which you'll notice is alleged ahead of the First Amendment issues:
That same lawyer also happened to mention the Constitution's Contracts Clause, which you'll also notice is alleged first ahead of the 1A claims πŸ˜†
Read 15 tweets
Apr 5, 2023
That gives Wisconsin Dems 2 of the 3 branches. And may even jeopardize the Legislature's hard-right gerrymander.

And reduces the likelihood of votes being overturned in 2024

Rs really blew that one
Fair, but I've reached a point where to me the only thing that matters is downstream effects

There will be less sh*tbaggery in WI than there would be otherwise, for at least a brief span of time, and that's a good thing
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(