#BritneyGriner, #PaulWhelan & Marc Fogel are wrongfully detained & in the case of last 2, wrongfully convicted in Russia. Putin will only release them in some sort of swap. We swapped spies in 2010. We swapped Reed for Yaroshenko this year. We should do another swap now. THREAD.1
Viktor Bout is a horrible criminal. #BritneyGriner, #PaulWhelan & Fogel are not. But US diplomats need to weigh realistically costs & benefits here -- abstract principles versus the concrete interests of real Americans. 2/
Bout has been in captivity since 2008. He has a decade or so to go on his sentence. What is the marginal benefit of holding him until the end versus the benefit of freeing these 3 Americans? That's the question. 3/
Some argue that, in principle, you cant real trade criminals for innocent people. I agree with that sentiment. I also know that, in diplomacy, values and interests clash all the time. All the time. 4/
But we can swap these people without making statements about their guilt or innocence. (Russia needs this face-saving step too). Both sides simply agree to have these "prisoners" held in captivity in their home countries. 5/
Others argue that trading "hostages" will encourage more hostage-taking in the future. That's a hypothesis not supported by strong data. 6/
And this research about "hostage swaps" is mostly about terrorist organizations. Putin conducts acts of terrorism, but he does not behave or have the interests of classic non-state terrorist organizations. 7/
And let me pause to say I am NOT an expert on terrorism! Real experts should correct me if I'm mischaracterizing this literature. (cc: @BrianMJenkins ) But I am a bit of an expert on Putin. He behaves differently. 8/
I do not believe that a swap for Griner/Whelen/Fogel for Bout would lead to more Americans being arrested in Russia. I also hope Americans will stop going to Russia while Putin is in power! 9/
I also know how incredibly difficult it is to negotiate these deals. But we have done so before with Russia & other countries. In these particular cases, the benefits of getting Griner/Whelan/Fogel out are worth the costs of doing this swap. 10/
And as we rightly focus on Americans held wrongly in Russia, lest not forget Americans held wrongly elsewhere, including Siamak Namazi in Iran. 11/ END THREAD
When #G7 leaders meet tomorrow, increasing pressure on Russia to help speed the end of Putin's invasion of Ukraine should be a top priority. Regarding sanctions, some say nothing more can be done. Our International Working Group on Russian Sanctions disagrees. THREAD 1/
On how to strengthen financial sanctions, read our "Working Group Paper #4: Strengthening Financial Sanctions against the Russian Federation," drive.google.com/file/d/1_0wsGm…. 2/
On how to strengthen individual sanctions, read our "Working Group Paper #3: Individual Sanctions Roadmap: Recommendations for Sanctions against
the Russian Federation." drive.google.com/file/d/1NzzeTa… 3/
Important essay from @ProfPaulPoast distinguishing realism's dual functions as theory and policy, or what I would label explanation vs prescription. Liberalism has the same dual traits. But as a theory, why is there no correction/updating when the explanation is wrong? THREAD 1/
Mearsheimer (and others) is arguing nearly the exact same thing today as he did 3 decades ago. For instance, the predictions from realism in his 1990 article were wrong. "Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War." jstor.org/stable/2538981…. 2/
Maybe I missed it, but I see little evidence of Mearsheimer has amended his theoretical claims based on the evidence not supporting his hypothesis from 30 years ago. So that's why the lines between theory, prediction & ideology seem so blurry in this scientific field. 3/ END
After 100 days of Putin's unprovoked, barbaric invasion of Ukraine, let's remember the forest and trees. Putin is winning a few battles now. He may win more. But he has lost his war already. 1/ THREAD
Let's remember what Putin outlined as his war objectives. In his long essay about Ukraine, his hour-long speech before the war & many other times, Putin was very clear about what he aimed to achieve. So far, he's achieved very little. 2/
Putin explained to us that Russians and Ukrainians were one nation -- Ukrainians are just Russians with accents. He aimed to reunite this nation, torn apart as much by the Bolsheviks as the West. Regarding this objective, he has failed miserably. 3/
In addition to Morgenthau, let me quote another high priest of realism arguing against appeasement with whom I agree. 1/ THREAD.
“Appeasement contradicts the dictates of offensive realism and therefore it is a fanciful and dangerous strategy. It is unlikely to transform a dangerous foe into a kinder, nicer, opponent, much less a peace-loving state." 2/
"Indeed, appeasement is likely to whet, not shrink, an aggressor’s appetite for conquest." 3/
Lots of self-proclaimed "realists" are arguing these days that appeasing Putin by giving him Donbas will end his invasion. But it should be noted that scholars from the realist tradition have also argued the exact opposite. 1/ THREAD.
"Appeasement is a foreign policy that attempts to meet the threat of imperialism with methods appropriate to a policy of the status quo. Appeasement tries to deal with imperialism as though it were a policy of the status quo." 2/
"It errs in transferring a policy of compromise from a political environment favorable to the preservation of the status, where to belongs, to an environment exposed to imperialist attack, where it does not belong." 3/
When I worked at @WHNSC and @StateDept, I observed that decision-makers tended to overstate the risks of action and underestimate the risks of inaction. Non-decisions are decisions with consequences too. THREAD 1/
The current debate about whether to give Ukraine MLRS is a serious one. I'm not privy to all the secret intel that NATO leaders have. But NOT transferring this weapon system has consequences too. Is it really in the US and NATO to allow Putin to occupy all of Donbas? 2/
And if Putin takes Donbas, why do people assume he will stop there? Nothing whets the appetite of an invader to try to take more territory than short-term victories. 3/