BBN Profile picture
Jul 5 26 tweets 7 min read
1/24
Lots of continuing confusion it seems around the #HMI accounts and the company's core profitability.

For me, this is in part driven by a desire to focus on the revenues when the focus should be on the cash flows

Here's my long thread opinion.
$ = AUD only.
2/
Firstly, it is important to appreciate that HMI wrote down AUD $600,000 in trade debtors on 31/12/21.

Also, "Some debtors are given industry standard longer payment terms which may cross over more than one accounting period," which helps create a difference between...
3/
sales and cash receipts in any given accounting period.

Note also that all trade debtors still fall within the current (within 12 months) trade and other receivables. The only non-current (more than 12 months) relates to recoverable taxes. So not direct sales related.
4/
This demonstrates that HMI expect to collect all outstanding trade debtors whose "carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value."

So carried actual sales value.

Therefore an easy and applicable method exists to calculate the sales price for each period.
5/
That being cash receipts for the period + trade debtors at the end of the period - trade debtors at the end of the previous period.

For 2021, this would be $3,628,268 + $1,824,564 - $930,364 (YE 2020 trade debtors minus $600,817 write down)

= $4,522,468 / 85,030 tons
6/
This equates to a price of AUD $53,20 per ton and signals that $1,824,564 (equivalent to c. 34,296 tons) will be collected in 2022.

If we then look at the quarterly sales run for 2021 we see the following,

H1 2021 = 26,726
Q3 2021 = 46,166
Q4 2021 = 22,984
7/
34,296 tons reflects payment terms that run c. 4 months. Meaning most of Q4 receipts will likely be collected in the following accounting year.

As a comparison here now is 2020.

FY cash receipts of $2.71m against 54,115 tons of sales giving a sales price of $50.25 per ton.
8/
$930,364 of trade debtors (when write down removed) at the YE 2020 equates to c. 18,514 tons

2020 Sales Breakdown
H1 2020 9,859 (tons)
Q3 2020 = 27,577
Q4 2020 = 16,719

Again, this demonstrates (in simple terms) that Q4 sales (at least) would run into the following FY.
9/
There was a 5.87% uplift in the ave. sales price between 2020 and 2021.

This is compounded by the fact that the BRL/AUD was 13.7% stronger in 2021 which should have seen prices drop by c. $7 based on 200BRL per ton pricing.

This indicates a c. AUD $10 or 20% rise in prices
9A/
between 2020 and 2021 (Be it that this exercise is about direction rather than exact calculations).

This is understandable given the fact that HMI reported that 2020 prices stayed in line with 2019.

All of which is very encouraging for the size of the price rises for 2022.
10/
With these figures in our hands, it is possible to get a rough estimate on how 2022 should now pan out.

Sales to date are 117,589 tons which given the evidence should all be booked in 2022.

If so then at 2021 prices cash receipts should be
$6.26m + $1.824m (YTD).
11/
The $1.824m being the current trade debtors from 2021.

This, therefore, equates to c. $8.1m in cash receipts YTD which should already give HMI significant positive cash flows for the year with the majority of Q3 still to be added.
12/
If Q3 (which has been the strongest quarter over the last two years) delivers the same result as 2021 (c. 46,166 tons) then the above data from 2020 and 2021 supports the argument that c. 30,000 tons will be booked in 2022.

This adds a further $1,596,000.
13/
Therefore, the total cash receipts for 2022 would be approximately $9.7m.

If Q4 then matched 2021 (22,984 tons) then we would see $2.08m in trade debtors at YE and due for payment during 2023.

So we have expanding profits with a bigger starting base for the following year.
14/
However, there are two more factors to allow for here.

The company has reported price rises in 2022.

At a 15% increase in prices, then 2022 cash receipts rise to $10.88m and trade debtors for FY 2023 increase to $2.39m.

Super healthy for an HMI with minimal trade payables.
15/
In addition, we have the BRL/AUD.

To date in 2022, this has averaged 3.64BRL/AUD.

Based on the calculated average price of $53.20 for 2021 that alone lifts prices by c. 10% compared to 2021. Turning $53.20 into $58.50 before any other price rises even begin.
16/
Meaning YTD cash receipts (see post 10 above) should already be running at $9.75m. Be it that with the payments lag into Q3 this won't be fully witnessed until the FY 2022 accounts are available. But that doesn't mean it's not there.
17/
Additionally, the weaker BRL exchange rate will also reduce Brazilian-based cost of sales and any other Admin costs (e.g. advertising) which should further enhance the net cash inflows in 2022.

Establishing costs is a tad bit trickier and is perhaps for another thread but...
18/
the approach should be the same meaning that the actual figures shown aren't reflective of the headline sales figure but actual concluded sales which are influenced by the sales concluded in the latter part of the previous year and perhaps any one off longer term contracts.
19/
The reality is that HMI needs to be judged on cash flows based on the fact that a very steep growth path has skewed the numbers up until 2021.

This is because payment terms push sales agreed later in the year into the following FY. So trade debtor sums need to be respected.
20/
Under such a scenario larger sales years such as 2021 and 2022 take time to funnel through to the bottom line.

2022 is the first year whereby the majority of sales (63% based on H1 117,589 tons vs projected 186,000 FY) should be made in the first half of the year.
21/
This allows for far greater cash collection and has the added boost of being backed by really meaningful trade receipts from the previous year.

2023 may have a similar uplift if the last c. 4 months of 2022 deliver markedly higher sales compared to 2021.
22/
A long and perhaps complicated thread that perhaps needs several reads to be truly understood.

For the record, I am not stating that my figures are 100% accurate. This is more about understanding the way business flows through HMI.
23/
What I have demonstrated to myself with this exercise is that HMI is set to start throwing off significant positive cash flows this year.

Yes, I would like to see admin costs lower and have asked questions around this for the investor call.
24/
But even at its current standing, the cash flow should still be very strong based on an H2 2022 that need only match Q3 2021 to be realised.

After that, it becomes about building up cash flows for 2023.

I believe there's a big misread on this one by the market/sentiment.
By this, I of course mean #HMI expects to collect all outstanding trade debtors whose "carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value." in the current 12-month FY period.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with BBN

BBN Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BigBiteNow

Jul 5
1/7
Based on what I have just talked about if #HMI had received all the monies from its sales in 2021 then this would have amounted to $4.52m and the business would have been profitable at the operating level in 2021.
2/
What's more, the $4.454m paid out in 2021 reflects more accurately the true costs to run the business over the course of one year.

One cannot conclude exactly how much HMI produced in 2021 because the cash receipts reflect payment dates and not when the goods were received.
3/
Inventory was fairly minimal which reflects an operation that leans towards producing to order.

However, the costs associated with administration clearly eat up the vast majority of this with the consolidated statement accounting for c. $3.85m in the period.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 5
1/4
Yes, a very good start with the key message that,

"Significantly, the three holes completed to date targeted the geochemical high, but the core of the magnetic high has yet to be tested."

The direction of the #SRB drill holes clearly demonstrates this.
2/
“This is a very promising time for Serabi and between this discovery, the excellent progress with the development of Coringa, improved production from the Palito Complex, and advancing all our high priority regional targets, we look forward to updating all our stakeholders.”
3/
I agree and such words about Palito help support the belief that June was another strong month. Meaning Q2 should have delivered levels of gold production that are in line with the guidance set at the start of the year.
Read 4 tweets
May 21, 2021
1/5
In this enclosed blog I attempted to demonstrate the significance of the V205 $8 per lb point.

Given what has just been reported in China, I believe we will shortly see $9 pr lb V205.

#BMN

2/
Here now is the same historical V205 price chart marked up at $9 per lb.

Upon hitting $9 per lb the only time since 1980 that the V205 price has not gone on to spike to at least $11.50 per lb was in 2006/07 but it was coming off a downtrend. Image
3/
on all other occasions, the price continued higher because such pricing demonstrates a tight market is in play.

On a simple comparison to FeV that equates to a $50 per kg market.

Yes, we need more information on Europe/US prices.

thebushveldperspective.com/vanadium-prices
Read 5 tweets
May 21, 2021
1/7
The latest vanadium price report is now available.

V205 120,500 CNY/t now the norm. See my previous explanations for what this likely means for the price in dollars.

I make China V205 running at $8.70 per lb.

#BMN #vanadium

Image
2/
That's now well above my $8 per lb rising trend break out point.

More importantly,

"People in the market has high enthusiasm for inquiries, and big factory is expected to adjust June V2O5 flake next week, and their wait-and-see sentiment increases."
3/
As I have said previously the big factories in China are key here as they produce the vast majority of Chinese V205.

Here's a second report from today. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 21, 2021
1/5
Bushveld Energy 2021 position if listed separately,

A. $8m profit on #IES investment.

B. 25.25% ownership in Enerox who's 2020 contract wins were c. 65% of what IES achieved and will hold $30m for expansion to production twice the size of IES.

#BMN

2/
C. 55% ownership of a 200MWh electrolyte plant under construction with the IDC of S.A.

D. Mini-grid project under construction at Vametco in partnership with the IDC with potential to open up localised VRFB production and industrial opportunity.
3/
E. Actively tendering for Eskom BESS projects totalling c. 1,440MWh with the battery tender element valued by the World Bank at $468m.

F. First active vanadium rental product in play with a UK client.
Read 5 tweets
May 21, 2021
1/4
As stated the other day #SRB hit AISC $1,080 at c. 40k oz production in 2019.

This year looking like min. 36,000 oz is on which will raise that AISC slightly.

However, we must not forget the exchange rate.

2/
In 2019 the Brazil Real averaged R3.95 to a dollar.

YTD in 2021 it is running at R5.47 a dollar.

That's a 38% difference to 2019. The vast majority of SRB costs are in Brazil Real with revenues in dollars.
3/
So it's going to have an effect and certainly gives me great confidence that my $1,200 AISC estimate is top end.

Gold price YTD is averaging $1,790 per oz.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(