詳しくは、昨年末のウクライナ研究会での発表「大反省会「ウクライナ危機」(Scholars’ ontological,epistemological and methodological approaches to the "Ukraine Crisis")」 (英語)を参照。松里先生もお誘いしたがご参加いただけなかったことは残念。researchgate.net/publication/35…
私の周りの研究者の間ではなぜこの論文がNationalities Papersの査読を通ったのか疑問視する声がある。
Matsuzato, Kimitaka. (2018) “The Donbas War and Politics in Cities on the Front: Mariupol and Kramatorsk,” Nationalities Papers 46(6).
松里公孝「ウクライナ動乱の一年に思う」『学士会会報』2015(2)。
「クリミアの内政と政変(二〇〇九-一四年)」『 現代思想』2014.7
Hosaka, S. (2019). Welcome to Surkov’s theater: Russian political technology in the Donbas war. Nationalities papers, 47(5), 750-773. cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Hosaka, S. (2021). Enough with Donbas “Civil War” Narratives?. Civil War? Interstate War? Hybrid War?, 89. books.google.co.jp/books?hl=ja&lr…
DPRにおけるチェルカーシンの帰国報告 К. В. Черкашин (к.полит.наук, доцент) Донецкий национальный университет (г. Донецк, ДНР)
cyrilcherkashyn@gmail.com ВИЗИТ ДЕЛЕГАЦИИ УЧЁНЫХ ДНР И КРЫМА В ЯПОНИЮ
(アクセスできなくなっているが)kf.sgi.donntu.org/sites/default/…
ウクライナを巡る学者の存在・認識論的立場の違い
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My new article examines Soviet illegal intelligence—live doubles, sabotage planning, and their nexus. Drawing on the Mitrokhin Papers, it reconstructs how deep-cover "illegals" infiltrated countries where forging documents was difficult. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
The article focuses on something often overlooked: not active measures, but illegal intelligence (Line N) and sabotage planning (Line F).
In Japan, the KGB tested legalization through "live doubles"—replacing real identities with deep-cover Soviet officers.
Soviet illegals thrived where civil registries were weak. In Latin American countries, loose birth/death record systems enabled easy legalization. Japan (and Western Europe)—with stricter documentation regimes—posed a far tougher challenge for Chekists. nytimes.com/2025/05/21/wor…