In 2020 UNEP commissioned me to lead a 70 page report, funded by govt of Norway, into origin & implications of the pandemic. Called "Covid-19 - a warning" it had 34 named reviewers. UNEP are now delaying its publication; I can only speculate why, but I have 2 main theories 1/3
1. It speculates & reviews evidence of a lab origin, and it criticises gain of function; 2. It doesn't strongly link covid to either biodiversity loss or to climate change (though each is remotely plausible) - hence, I think, this unsettles some UNEP power holders. Either way 2/3
I am very cross - not only at the waste of resources; $, time & expertise, of myself and many others, but by what increasingly smells like censorship by a UN body. @vukoje_ana @EmmaReillyTweet @JamieMetzl @JeffDSachs @LNLonRN @JulianCribb @serge_morand #OneHealth @CroakeyNews
UNEP have published forerunners of my report eg at unep.org/resources/repo… and un-spbf.org/wp-content/upl… Maybe the delay in final report is bureacratic inertia? If they intend to "kill" it why would they leave these earlier traces?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hon Prof CD Butler

Hon Prof CD Butler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ColinDavdButler

Dec 20, 2021
1/6 I tweet into the wilderness, I know. Every day I hear horrible stuff re the pandemic. I have excellent reasons for thinking COVID-19 was caused by a lab leak - and even if it wasn't, the next one could be. I also have excellent credentials; I worked with Peter Daszak as 1 of
2/6 4 co-editors of the journal EcoHealth (2010-13); I have circa 300 scientific papers, chapters & letters to my name; almost all relevant to ecological change and future health (many as 1st or sole author); I am lead author for a 25k word report, in press, for UNEP on cause &
3/6 response to pandemic. I also publ'd (12/20) one of 1st papers warning it could be a leak. In 01/21 our letter to Lancet, responding to Calisher et al, was rejected, but almost identical version was published 09/21 after (as now known) Lancet editor @richardhorton1 changed his
Read 6 tweets
Jun 3, 2021
1/14 By far, best summary of this sordid story that I have read. Some snippets: "The evidence assembled by #DRASTIC amounts to what prosecutors call probable cause—a strong, evidence-based case for a full investigation."
newsweek.com/exclusive-how-…
2/14 @TheSeeker268 posted @ydeigin 's theory on Reddit, which promptly suspended his account permanently. .. .. recently discovered a massive Chinese database of academic journals and theses called CNKI. (Shortly after, China blocked access to that database).
3/14 Had WIV been actively working on RaTG13 during the 7 years since they discovered it? Peter Daszak said no: @franciscodeasis disproved that, discovering WIV scientists actively studied it in 2017 and 2018—they hadn't stuck it in a freezer and forgotten about it, after all.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 8, 2021
1/n U.S. govt has reason to believe several researchers inside WIV became sick in autumn 2019, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions re credibility of Shi Zhengli’s claim of “zero infection” 2017-2021.state.gov/fact-sheet-act…
2/n CCP prevented independent journalists, investigators, global health authorities from interviewing researchers at WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry .. must include i/views with these researchers & full account of unreported illness.
3/n WIV has published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus, WHO investigators must have access to WIV records
Read 4 tweets
Jan 20, 2021
1/n Thread (rumination) on conflict of interest (COI) dailycaller.com/2021/01/18/pet… "Dr. Peter Daszak admitted on Friday (ie Jan 15) through a spokesman that he issued the [Lancet] statement to protect Chinese scientists from online criticism.” Let's assume PD did, though with others.
2/n Lancet letter written when Chinese scientists receiving death threats; letter .. a show of support .. they were caught between important work trying to stop an outbreak & "crush of online harassment” ["Daszak’s spokesman told The Journal"].
3/n {BTW where would online harassment be coming from? I thought access of Chinese citizens, living in China, to Western social media is v limited. Do they mean online harassment via Chinese social media?} Anyway, let's assume protection of Chinese colleagues part of PD's motive.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(