Ok - Jen Shah of #RHOSLC is here in Courtroom 23A, it's for "change of plea" (to guilty). Inner City Press has been covering the case, even before Shah was added to it, and will live tweet, thread below
All rise!
Judge Sidney Stein: Ms. Shah, do you wish to plead guilty to Count 1 of the indictment?
Shah: Yes, your Honor.
Judge Stein: I will need to ask you certain questions...
Judge Stein: If there were a trial, you could see and hear all the witnesses against you and your attorney could cross examine them. Do you understand those rights?
Shah: Yes, your Honor.
Judge Stein: You will be giving up all of these rights and there will be no trial - do you understand?
Shah: Yes your Honor.
Judge Stein: Did you read the indictment?
Shah: Yes I did.
Judge Stein: You are charged in Count 1 with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with telemarketing, do you understand?
Shah: Yes your Honor.
Judge: AUSA Fletcher, set forth the elements.
AUSA: An agreement to violate the law, and entered it knowingly
Judge Stein: Do you understand that the maximum penalty is 30 years in prison?
Shah: Yes your Honor. [Presumably there is a plea agreement that will be made public in this proceeding, watch this feed]
Note: To get guilty plea to Count 1, US dropping Count 2, Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering, "from 2012 to Nov 2019."
Judge Stein: You understand you will lose valuable civil rights, including the right to vote and bear arms?
Shah: I do.
Judge Stein: After I receive your pre-sentencing report I will determine guidelines, which in any event do not bind me. Do you understand that the system of parole has been abolished, except for "good time credit" at the facility where you are located?
Shah: Yes.
Judge Stein: I have before me a document sent to you and your lawyers. Did you read it before you signed it?
Shah: Yes.
Judge Stein: Are there any side deals I should know about?
Shah: No, your Honor.
Judge Stein: In this agreement you've agreed not to appeal if I sentence you to 168 months in prison or fewer?
Shah: Yes your Honor.
Judge Stein: And you've agreed to forfeit $6 million, and restitution of $9 million?
Shah: Yes, your Honor.
Judge Stein: Ms. Shah, what did you do?
Shah: Wire fraud, offering services with little to no value. We used interstate telephones and emails. I knew many of the purchasers were over the age of 55. I am so sorry.
Judge Stein: What is the reason they bought?
Shah: Misrepresentations, regarding the value of the product or service, of which it had little to none.
Judge Stein: Did you know it was wrong and illegal?
Shah: Yes your Honor.
Judge Stein: AUSA Fletcher, what proof does the government have?
AUSA: We were made aware of FTC investigations against floors the defendant worked with. Between 2017 and 2021 beyond being a lead broker, she had a Manhattan based sales floor, she oversaw it.
AUSA: She did not put her name on bank accounts associated with the business. She only got paid in cash through a company credit card and a NYC apartment she lived in. She used encrypted applications, and moved operations off shore to Kosovo and incorp in Wyoming
Judge Stein: What were these "biz opps"?
AUSA Fletcher: So-called coaching services.
Judge Stein: Ms. Shah, how do you now plead?
Shah: Guilty.
Judge Stein: Are you pleading because you are guilty?
Shah: Yes.
Judge Stein: I am signing the consent order of forfeiture in the sum of $6,500,000. Ms. Shah, I find your plea is knowing... I accept your guilty plea & adjudge you guilty. Sentencing will be October 12-
Shah's lawyer: We have a trial on October 11. Another date?
AUSA: How about the week before Thanksgiving?
Shah's lawyer: How about the week after Thanksgiving?
Judge Stein: I'll set it for Oct 12.
Shah's lawyer: This Oct 11 trial in the state court [not Shah] we've been waiting five years.
Judge Stein: OK, submission Nov 7
Judge Stein: Continue to abide by your conditions of release. I'll see you at your sentencing. We are adjourned.
Story soon on InnerCityPress.com and patreon.com/MatthewRussell…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inner City Press

Inner City Press Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @innercitypress

Jul 12
OK- US v Schulte CIA #Wikileaks deliberations Day 3, there's been a jury question. Schulte, brought in by Marshals, is studying draft response. Stand-by counsel but not (yet?) his mother here. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
Still waiting for arrival of Judge. AUSA asks Schulte and stand-by counsel, Are we all good on the Berger transcripts?
So that's one of the questions.
All rise!
Judge Furman: There's a question about my jury charge, what is a "substantial step."
AUSA: The jury's question is a bit inscrutible.
Schulte asks for 5 minutes.
Granted.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 8
OK - another Jan 6 case, in which Victoria White has hired her assigned lawyer and wants to represent herself (it's catching). DDC Judge Bates asks, Do you know the Federal Rules of Evidence? White: Exculpatory evidence? Maybe a thread below, depending how it goes
Judge Bates: In my opinion, you'd do better with a lawyer. I urge you strongly not to try to represent yourself. Do you understand my advice?
White: I do.
Judge Bates: I understand you were unsatisfied with your last lawyer. Is this what you want to do?
A: Yes.
Judge Bates: Have you ever been treated for mental issues?
White: You are asking this in a public proceeding?
Judge Bates: I'm not going to ask more - just, are you still in treatment?
White: I'm OK.
Judge Bates: Turn off the public line. Or wait a minute.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 8
OK - US v. Josh Schulte, now jury charge then deliberations (Day 13 of trial). Inner City Press has reported the trial(s) & is writing a book(let) on it, soon here amazon.com/author/matthew… & will live tweet charge & deliberations, questions, verdict, thread below
Judge Furman: Jurors, I want to remind you that during deliberations your phones should be off and not with you. You can check them during breaks. And let me remind you: Mr. Schulte is presumed innocent.
Judge Furman: One type of evidence is called direct evidence. There is circumstantial evidence [wet umbrella analogy follows, modified only with "assume the curtain were entirely drawn - in fact, there are in this case." #SealedCourtroom
Read 19 tweets
Jul 7
OK- US v Josh Schulte CIA #Wikileaks #Vault7 closing arguments today (Day 12 of trial); yesterday it emerged DOJ thinks a journalist can be prosecuting for reporting what Schulte might say- Inner City Press is covering the case(s) & will live tweet, thread below
Judge Furman: Mr. Schulte, are you ready?
Schulte: I just need to be taken into the holding cell to change my shirt.
Judge Furman: Fine. And please pull your mask up over your nose.
Jury entering!
Judge Furman: Good morning, jurors. Yesterday's witness "Dave" is also "Dave C." And I have approved redactions to the transcript. Now, the closing arguments.
AUSA: On April 20, 2016, Joshua Schulte stole the CIA's cyber tools. He turned on the US
Read 72 tweets
Jul 6
OK - US v. Josh Schulte CIA #Wikileaks trial Day 11, FBI Agent Schlessinger being cross examined by Schulte. Inner City Press is writing about the case - today innercitypress.com/sdnylive108sch… & soon here amazon.com/author/matthew… - will live tweet, thread below
Schulte: Good morning. Each of the notebooks you went through was 80-sheets, right?
FBI Schlessinger: I think so. I don't recall.
Schulte: Let's pull up Exhibit 806. This is 160 total pages, right?
Schlessinger: Yes.
Schulte: But the US choose only 2 pages, right?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge Furman: Sustained.
Schulte: And none of these pages were transmitted, right?
Judge Furman: I think this has been asked and answered.
Read 44 tweets
Jul 5
OK -now in courtroom 23B is Jen Shah of Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, final pre-trial conference before telemarketing fraud trial set for July 18 @sdnylive. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below patreon.com/posts/59370292
Jen Shah just went up front and spoke at length with judge's courtroom deputy. Two lawyers with her at defense table.
Judge entering - all rise!
Judge Stein: We're ready for trial. The expert, I'm going to allow to testify about charge-back fraud. We will begin trial on July 18.
[Shah stands up, then sits down]
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(