Dean Burnett Profile picture
Jul 13 21 tweets 7 min read
Meant to address this over a week ago but, ironically, I've had Covid, so not been up to it.

But with cases rising alarmingly and there being a decent chance they'll be reintroduced, here are some psychological explanations for resistance to #facemasks

/1
The most obvious and fundamental mechanism behind objection to wearing #Facemasks is simple 'reactance'

Basically, the human brain likes autonomy, and instinctively objects, reacts, to anything that reduces it

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P….

/2
In many cases, the context doesn't matter as much as the innate resistance to having your autonomy reduced. In this case, the fact that it's the government (or whoever) telling people they MUST wear a mask, rather than requesting it, means they resist doing so.

/3
The fact that the rationale behind mandatory mask wearing is sound (i.e. there's a lot of #Covid around and we need to reduce the spread and keep people safe) is deemed, by some, to be less important than the 'mandatory' bit, which they object to.

/4
Tied into the reactance is human sensitivity to status. We want to be looked up to, we don't like being looked down on. It's another fundamental aspect of how we work.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

/5
So, when we're made to wear a mask, we are acknowledging that other people matter as much/more than us, and that there are people who have authority over us, and we humans tend not to like that.

/6
For most people they can put up with it just fine, but some may be too sensitive to their status to just accept #FaceMasks

This will be particularly salient in Western, capitalist nations, where individualism and status are emphasised.

/7
Maybe that's why certain people get so angry about having to wear #Facemasks in shops, fast food franchises etc. For them, these are places where they enjoy superior social status as the almighty customer. Employees enforcing mask rules upends that entirely, and they hat it

/8
They *hate* it, they don't *hat* it. That'd be daft

Another potential factor in resistance to #Facemasks is an instinctive wariness of body autonomy. In many cases, people experience discomfort when something threatens their physical integrity/space.

/9
There's a class of phobias (needles, blood, vomiting etc.) where people react badly to things that threaten their physical integrity. It makes us instinctively uncomfortable. It's not a huge leap to assume that masks, covering our breathing holes, would trigger this a bit

/10
The fact that masks *don't* obscure breathing in any noticeable way is actually immaterial for many. Just like how needles don't actually harm you and vomiting is often a *good* thing as it's a body expelling toxins etc. Phobias are irrational, illogical, by definition

/11
Another potential factor in resistance to #Facemasks; we humans evolved over millions of years to glean copious information from other people's faces, we have dedicated brain regions for it

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusiform_…

Masks obstruct faces, and our brains may object to that

/12
Thwarting our brain's expectations as to what a face conveys is may be one of the reasons that people are scared of clowns; the painted on smile etc. scrambles our perception of the face

Masks could do that a bit too, meaning we object to them

theguardian.com/science/brain-…

/13
And then there's the cultural associations. Pre-pandemic, the sort of people you saw wearing lower-face covering masks in the media were

Surgeons, and related medical/biohazard people
Muggers, robbers
Ninjas/assassins

All of which convey 'something bad has/will happen'

/14
If that's your main cultural reference for facemasks, and suddenly you're surrounded by them, you wouldn't necessarily 'like' them. Enough to put you off wearing them? Maybe. It could trigger a low-level dislike which manifests as such.

/15
And one final reason why people would resist #Facemasks?

Good old fashioned denial, the psychological self-defence mechanism when bad stuff happens that you really don't want to accept as reality.

harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/de…

/16
Because that's the thing; you may be upset/scared/resistant to the idea of #Covid. Wearing a face mask may protect you against it, but it also means accepting that Covid is a tangible reality, because you've altered your behaviour to recognise it.

/17
For some, it may be more comforting, even subconsciously, to deny Covid is real, or a big deal, than to actively do something to protect yourself (and others) from it. But trying to do both leads to a dissonance, which is also uncomfortable. So, masks are resisted

/18
For the record, all I've described are possible factors in people resisting/objecting to #Facemasks.

They're not *excuses*. One of the best things about our brains is that they allow us to overrule our base instincts and make logical decisions and behave cooperatively

/19
The fact that people's baser, instinctive drives and reactions are so regularly validated and reinforced by credible-seeming ideologically-driven media types and platforms is the real, bigger problem if you ask me. But that's a whole other discussion.

/20
Thanks for reading this far.

As ever, if you've liked my insight here, please consider one of my books, they all have stuff like this in them

amazon.co.uk/Dean-Burnett/e…

Or check out my new podcast, @whyexistPod. I promise it's funny and informative.



/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dean Burnett

Dean Burnett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garwboy

Apr 9
Right, following on from this thread about #IntrusuveThoughts, a lot of people have commented about embarrassing memories that pop up out of the blue and make them cringe all over again.

That's a different, if related, phenomenon. Here's my understanding of why it happens

/1
First and foremost, it's important to recognise that the fundamentals of the human brain's memory system were laid down looooong ago. Before we were even human. Consciousness and rational thought are far more recent developments, evolutionary-speaking

/2
One upshot of this is that our memory system is often the result of new software running on old hardware.

A lot of the brain is like this, in fairness, and it causes a lot of issues. I *may* have written a book all about it

amazon.co.uk/Idiot-Brain-Ne…

/3
Read 27 tweets
Apr 8
Ok so this is actually quite a common thing. It's 'intrusive thoughts', and it's invariably a harmless, sometimes even helpful, phenomenon. It's often just the sign of a human brain operating as normal. That said, things can go wrong.

WHY does it happen? Well...

/1
One particularly useful power of the human brain is its ability to create simulations and scenarios. i.e. we have a powerful imagination
But it's not used solely for fantastical stuff; a lot of the time we use it to model scenarios of everyday things that might/could happen

/2
Basically, our brain is pretty much constantly coming up with hypotheticals. "What if this happened?" "What if that occurred?" "What if I did this?" "What if they did that?" etc.
This helps shape, guide, and reinforce our decision making and behaviour

#IntrusiveThoughts

/3
Read 24 tweets
Jan 9
The more I've thought about this, the more I feel it really boils my p*ss.

It takes everything that decent conscientious science, academic, and investigative writers do (and yeah, I include myself in this), and gleefully spits in our face

/1
It takes most multiple attempts to get just one book published. If they succeed at all. Which the majority don't

IMHO, getting a book published is a privilege that should be respected, not a God given right for you to spew any old shite at a potential readership

/2
And that's doubly true if you're claiming to be imparting important, potentially-life-altering ideas and notions to anyone who might read it. In that case, you should be doubly sure your claims and arguments are solid, backed up by evidence, even if just from a moral POV

/3
Read 19 tweets
Jan 9
@polaleeks @PaulaGhete I'd never paste anyone for asking questions, so don't worry about that.

The issue here is that a great many things are being conflated into one excessive, unhelpful idea, i.e. 'modern tech is bad and is damaging us'. The truth, far as we know, is way more complex

/1
@polaleeks @PaulaGhete First and foremost; yes, phones and social media etc. are 'distracting' in so many ways. They provide us with dozens of things to pay attention to, all of which are constantly updated (novelty makes things more alluring/stimulating), and they're on our person at all times

/2
@polaleeks @PaulaGhete So, it's fair to say that your phone/device will occupy a lot of your attention. Because it will. That's what it's for, and we're instinctively wired to react to the things it offers us.

But that's very different to saying they disrupt/damage our brains/focus etc.

/3
Read 12 tweets
Jan 7
I've now spent a whole week working on my general health and fitness. Seven days of

- No booze
- No snacks
- Eating less meat
- Eating less in general
- Getting to bed earlier
- Daily gym sessions

And you know what? Right now, I feel like absolute sh*t
There are plenty of possible reasons for this, admittedly. My body had a very long time to get used to a specific calorie intake/activity rate, and I've totally thrown it out of whack. Will likely take time to adjust, physiologically and mentally.
But this is all new to me, this whole 'physical exertion' world. So, I'm going to be exploring the science of it, and talking to the experts, to see if they can help me get into better shape by my 40th birthday (July this year)

Got big plans ahead...
Read 5 tweets
Jan 2
Me, checking my mentions, and realising the Guardian have published another Johnan Harri article
NB: I tend to deliberately misspell his name on here, because I hear he's a notorious self-searcher. And I still occasionally get his acolytes sending me threats/wildly untrue accusations. Pretty tragic really, but who has the time to deal with that guff
And if anyone's wondering how/why Harri is still readily published by the Guardian despite, you know, everything he's guilty of, then this old thread of mine may shine some light on that

Read 65 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(