WWN: The government celebrated its confidence vote win by ramming through a planning bill which every single interested party that isn’t a money grabbing developer has labeled ‘a disaster’. @WhisperNewsLTD waterfordwhispersnews.com/2022/07/13/gov…
WWN smashes embargo😂
The vote doesn't happen until after debate that begins this evening at 7.09pm & ends around half nine.
The government hammered through the suspension of standing orders earlier today - a move needed because the late changes are o/s the scope of the Bill.
Watch this morning's episode unfold in our real time thread - almost as good as Being There and with echoes of Stranger Things
The lap of dishonour is in the Seanad @ 4.45pm. It will last for 45 mins. - less than a minute a page for the 47.5pp of amendments alone.
Exactly what the Chief Justice warned against in 2018.
The senior civil servants pushing this hate judges looking over their shoulders.
Someone within the system crafted this and gave it to legislators (at the last minute) as if it were true and fair. It is neither. It is the opposite.
On Amendment 25 (part) -
You can read the text for yourself -
Extra info from me, drawn from experience of the Court's approach to remittal: 1. There is no reluctance to remit. 2. There is already a presumption in favour of remittal. 3. This change is mandatory, so it directly attacks the discretion a judge has not to remit for good reason.
And cites @attractaub before going into the crazy short time given to legislators to review these changes.
Minister claims without evidence that he flagged these changes in the Seanad last April.
He didnt tell us what he was going to do, says @aliceeire.
Compares that with the "flexibility" now given to developers to decide what they want to build.
A mirrored disregard for democracy and transparency in both the planning process and the legislative process.
They are all the time trying to put the finger on one side of the scales to tip them in favour of the developer and against everyone else.
Notes the serious legal concerns raised incl. impermissible trespassing on EIA, Aarhus Convention rights of the public.
Incentivise developers to delay while maximising profits, like when standards on apartments were lowered, supposedly to speed up building, which did not work.
The original bill, even before the extra forty eight pages were parachuted in, was a bad bill - @aliceeire
WWN being praised in the Seanad brings a fitting end to a thread that opened with their great take on this scandal so well done @WhispersNewsLTD
This might well bump WWN up a notch or two from its already proud claim to be Waterford's 6th fave local newspaper. #NosebleedTerritory
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
‘It is difficult to escape the conclusion that the amendments are being rushed through to avoid controversy, negative media coverage, and the requirement to actually explain what is at issue.”
- @Mickcliff
‘Again.’
- Me
“On Thurs. evening opposition politicians were given details of 48 pages to be added to a 20-page planning bill. 2.5 hours have been set aside on Wednesday to debate these along with amendments from the original bill. It will be impossible for proper Dáil scrutiny to be applied.’
Decisions of ABP can be struck down by the Court.
There is an exceptionally short time limit to get Court permission to mount a case - just eight weeks from decision date.
That period may be extended by a Judge for 'good and sufficient reason'.
This week the Govt is pushing 'urgent' amendments to the Planning Act. They could propose allowing more allegedly tainted decisions to be reviewed by the Court.
Instead as Fred Logue shows, they are making Court challenges even harder.
Who benefits?