Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
@greg_doucette
Jul 13, 2022 β€’ 217 tweets β€’ >60 min read β€’ Read on X
This presents an ethical quandary: does it count as "letting the Threadnought die" if you actively kill it? πŸ€”
Oh they've never stopped, I just mute every new subthread I'm added on until someone gets adventurous and @'s me in a new one
The Threadnought is eternal!
"A Scummy Situation from Top to Bottom" is the name of Vic Mignogna's biography
The still-seething weeb bitterness is both real and comedic af 🀣

(The person responding to Josh is the leader of the fan club for Vic Mignogna, a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R Kelly of Anime) Image
Yiiiiikes

I can't imagine having a life so unfulfilled that I'd devote every waking moment to a pedo
The fun part is that I had no clue who any of these people were on 5 June 2019, but they have been obsessively mad at me for **three whole years now**

Meanwhile, I've gotten married, bought a house, got a Texas law license, got a promotion at work, helped feed 5K+ kids 2x/yr...
The Foodraiser got an award from a local nonprofit, @JoshMartinVoice tweeted about it, and Squally was Definitely Not Madβ„’ in his @'s within 8 minutes
Doubly funny considering we ended up with -0- sick children, but the amount of peanut butter we bought was big enough that JIF reached out directly to offer to cover any medical bills
I still miss that Hyundai 😩
Can confirm

I learned a valuable lesson from all that: you can never overestimate the incompetence of Percy and Screech
Squally is still going πŸ˜‚

I "receive the total credit for everyone else's work" (by accepting a plaque that says Mrs. Parker's Professors Foodraiser, does she think I'm Mrs. Parker?). She also doesn't seem to understand how the tax system works πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Vic Mignogna has the best fans ImageImage
Linear time, how does it work?
After 3+ years I'm not *surprised* that Vic Mignogna attracts morons, but it never stops being amusing just the same πŸ˜‚
Just be careful b/c brain worms are contagious and her case is terminal
Great guest list too 🀣 ImageImageImageImage
Greatest con ever
Doubt they'd even let me in tbh πŸ˜‚
::snortlaugh::
The Threadnought is eternal
Vic Mignogna has the best fans πŸ™ƒ
I did not. Wouldn't be surprised if the pedo just has several alts they bounce between
I see the Vic Mignogna fan who was defending child porn "art" is now defending Nazis:
Yep. Along with periodic comments on the LOLsuit even long after it was dismissed (see, e.g., )
Indeed

I'm honestly skeptical we'll ever get one at this point
I was wondering what @AkivaMCohen did to trigger the swarm of pedos who ended up in my @'s overnight -- and I'm pretty sure this did it πŸ˜‚
Doesn't really matter when the artist says "this is a 5yo" in one tweet and then talks about how f*ckable it is in the next
It's honestly hit a point where I feel like @AkivaMCohen has earned a spot on the Wiffle Bat List πŸ˜‚
They don't think before they tweet
Today is Day 1,168 of the Threadnought

Vic Mignogna's LOLsuit claiming people lied about him was dismissed by the court more than 2 years ago

Yet Vic's CHUDlets march on in my @'s...
Not a peep. I've given up hoping for an opinion tbh πŸ˜‚
Plausible
<itsfunnybecauseitstrue.gif> Image
Nope πŸ˜‚
Boozy staaaahhhhpp
Vic's gonna end up filing another LOLsuit and I'll have to add Boozy to the wiffle bat list πŸ˜‚
**NEW FIIIIIIIIIIILINGS**
I don't want to spoil it though so I'll let other folks go first πŸ˜‚
Mike's thread is below

Translation: Vic Mignogna – a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime – got BTFO'd out of the appeals court and went 0-17 again

*Plus* lost the bonus Rial-Toye cross-appeal on fees

Soooo he's now 0-35 overall πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
We'll be in touch πŸ™ƒ
Called it, btw
This is true, *technically* I was wrong because I somehow overestimated just how inept Ty Beard and Nick Rekieta would be πŸ˜‚
Maybe! πŸ˜‚ would also lend support to the theory that a non-zero number of 2nd Court of Appeals clerks follow me on here 🀣
If you thought Vic Mignogna getting *thoroughly* BTFO'd by the appeals court today would get his fans to have some perspective on his perving, you would be wrong:
The opinion repeatedly goes out of its way to thoroughly shit all over Ty Beard and his incompetence πŸ™ƒ
For folks who want to read the opinion where the 2nd Court of Appeals laughs repeatedly at Vic Mignogna and his muppet LOLyers, I put the docs on Dropbox:
dropbox.com/sh/mx83p1h3mrj…
Just put on Dropbox, go up one tweet from here
Yep πŸ™ƒ
The trial court said Rial+Toye could only have the same amount of fees that Marchi got

The appeals court said that was improper, and they should get even more
Yes πŸ™ƒ
Not over yet. There's a remand on the attorney fees, and Percy can always try to appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas to keep the grift going a bit longer
Putting a footnote of your appeals brief "compare [several hundred pages] to [several hundred other pages]" will do that πŸ˜‚

Just another reminder that Ty πŸ‘ Beard πŸ‘ doesn't πŸ‘ know πŸ‘ what πŸ‘ he's πŸ‘ doing πŸ‘
LOLOLOLOL Image
Where on earth have we heard of cases like Lane v Phares and Van Der Linden v Khan before?? πŸ€”

It's a mystery ImageImage
Can y'all imagine having your prolific history as a sexual predator documented in a publicly available appellate opinion?

Big yikes ImageImageImage
Yes

Anyone wanting to show that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and pedophile can just point folks to this appeals opinion

And if Mignogna sues anyone for defamation because they pointed out he's a sexual predator and pedophile, the defendant can cite this opinion

πŸ™ƒ
πŸ™ƒπŸ™ƒπŸ™ƒ
When your fans help your LOLyer torpedo your case... πŸ˜‚ ImageImage
Went ahead and made this my pinned tweet for the next few days so it's easy for y'all to find
New banner for the occasion btw, courtesy of @Emm_Initiative Image
"Hey Siri, how can you tell when an anime voice actor is a sexual predator and pedophile?" ImageImageImage
This case is like a whole lesson on legal malpractice πŸ˜‚ Image
Yes. I staked out the position that it would be successful (screenshot below), a couple other folks did too IIRC, but it was definitely a minority view Image
I co-sign this endeavor πŸ˜‚ Venmo a couple bones to @BillyBrew and force him to watch a livescreech
So much malpractice in this Vic Mignogna appeals opinion πŸ˜‚ Image
Not in anti-SLAPP jurisdictions, the cases are typically nuked before depos can happen
This passage and footnote roughly translates to "there were a lot more reasons why Vic Mignogna was going to get BTFO'd, but his LOLyer Ty Beard was so incompetent we won't get into all that": Image
Yep. The appeals court goes out of its way to meticulously document the variety of ways Ty Beard f*cked up Vic Mignogna's already-losing case
Oh this is a deep cut 🀣🀣🀣

Only the Threadnought OG's will get the reference
I think Twitter's algorithm is so tired of the Threadnought after 3 years that only a small chunk of the 100K are gonna see these tweets

May you be adequately compensated for your future suffering just the same πŸ˜‚
It's hilarious because when the Threadnought started on 6 June 2019, there were only like ~25K folks here
Also: feel like I owe an obligatory apology to all the folks who follow me because of [infosec | ShotSpotter LOLetry | police misconduct | #SilentSham | DUI Dan] now having their TLs flooded with tweets about the Vic Mignogna LOLsuit 😬😬

I'm sorry y'all
Ouch πŸ˜‚
You did! He was the trial-level judge who heard the case initially
Literally, tbqh
Happy to, let me know some dates πŸ‘Š
Remember back in the first week when the CHUDlets were all "she tweeted a letter, that's defamation! Greg told her she could, that's unauthorized practice of law!"? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Talk about a ride
What's the SOL on a negligent referral claim? πŸ˜‚
Had not planned it originally, but now that you mention Bojangles for lunch does sound appropriate πŸ€”
How's that saying go? "Movements can never fail, they can only be failed"?
$1 IIRC
The salt in my @'s is hilarious
Plus @AkivaMCohen and @dmschmeyer and @KathrynTewson and @Katerationopia and @questauthority had not yet formed into an IRL lawyer Voltron!

Quite a bit has happened since June 2019
Probably for the best to stay away πŸ˜‚

A good summary by @M_F_Rose is here: theverge.com/2019/9/18/2087…
Oh it did, it's 100% real πŸ˜†
Not sure on what Texas state rules there are, but generally compensatory damages are not while everything else (sanctions, etc) are
In theory, yes

Ty Beard knew he f*cked up royally though, so he helped Vic hide his assets awhile back. Unlikely anything gets paid tbh
Nick Rekieta always planned to use this case as his springboard to be a MAGAland commentator

And his plan worked, he can now pull in $1M a month in YT superchats

All he had to do was mislead people and pretend to be competent
The Texas 2nd Court of Appeals lays out pretty thoroughly that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and a pedophile

Take it up with them

Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
Sadly it's a wee bit too tight 3 years later πŸ˜‚ but I did pull it out for a posterity photo Image
Reading the Court of Appeals opinion on Vic Mignogna's case – where the court thoroughly documents how incompetent Ty Beard and Nick Rekieta were – makes the fact *they actually sold this t-shirt as lawsuit merch* even funnier πŸ™ƒ
If you think Vic Mignogna being colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime is funny, wait until you type his name in Twitter's GIF search and find out the #2 result is him confessing to assault in his deposition
The Court of Appeals said otherwise

Cry moar πŸ™ƒ
IMO only viable damages claim would be the delta for TCPA sanctions w Rial

A competent attorney could have gotten the hotel claim past TCPA using Van Der Linden v Khan

But neither Ty Beard nor Nick Rekieta understood the case, even after @questauthority gave it to them on Day 1
Fair point on the appeal, I was just thinking the initial suit

Tough to prove but for causation on mediation advice though IMO. Guess it would depend on what the offer was, but just from an evidentiary standpoint I don't see Vic carrying the burden on that
Vic Mignogna's fans can't even do their whataboutism right?

Big oof
Nah, I'm telling people that if you're a sexual predator and pedophile who's assaulted multiple women, don't sue the women claiming they're lying when they come forward

And if you do, don't hire Ty Beard or Nick Rekieta to do it
There are some instances where a defamation lawsuit in Texas is viable. The Alex Jones case is a recent example.

But most cases, most of the time, are going to lose

2/2
 @AdriannaPugh
This is sound legal advice tbh
Also true. In theory, Ty Beard could have laid it all out and Vic insisted on going forward anyway

But Remy, Ty doing something competently? C'mon πŸ˜‚
I guess my thinking is the TCPA-related damages wouldn't be actionable b/c Vic's prior conduct – consulting multiple attorneys who told him he didn't have a case, telling Rekieta he was on board with the GFM, etc – made it clear he was going to proceed regardless of the risks

1/
So the best damages claims would be the ones where things were worse because of Beard's incompetence, regardless of any advice given or not given re the TCPA

(I do agree w/ you and Mike re the appeal risks though)

2/2
 @j_remy_green
Not at all, but would that be a tort issue or a bar issue? (or both ofc)

I think the theoretical answer would be yes it could be tortious, but on a practical level I don't see how you'd prove by a preponderance that the prior attorney's misconduct was the but for cause
I do wonder what absurd sports metaphor Percy is gonna run with now, if losing 0-17 at trial is halftime πŸ˜‚
No clue who Scott Freeman is, but apparently the Daman Mills stuff was bona fide defamation (see from a couple days ago)
I tend to agree with this assessment

Someone rope @LegalEagle into doing a comparison vid πŸ˜‚
I'd forgotten this, this is hilarious πŸ˜‚
True

We should crowdsource some Threadnought lowlights anyway in case he can do something entertaining with it 😬
It's what happens when you don't prep your client for his depo because you're too busy trying to be a social media star πŸ˜‚
Gotta admire the Vic Mignogna fans giving even more money to Nick Rekieta's GoFundMe after the latest set of Ls πŸ˜‚ Image
There are none. The original LOLsuit was so bad, and the ensuing appeals so stupid, that there is no "fair and balanced" coverage

There are news articles that were right about this getting LOL'd out of court repeatedly, and there's an assortment of ISWV hugboxes
You jest, but several of Vic Mignogna's fans in my @'s are adamant that the Court of Appeals went out of its way to say Vic would have won if he had a different LOLyer
Ah, that both makes sense and is 100% unsurprising πŸ˜‚

Clowns
For folks who want the page-by-page tweet-through of the Vic Mignogna appeals op, @AkivaMCohen has you covered here:
Do you *actually* feel bad, @AkivaMCohen? πŸ˜‚

(For newcomers: )
::lolsnort::
It's his real email address, was part of the rΓ©sumΓ© that got entered into evidence
Exactly right
Only thing appealable is the 2-1 split on remanding for more fees

The merits questions were unanimous 3-0, so they could appeal but no chance SCOTX accepts review
No, it's still discretionary under Tex. Gov't. Code Β§22.001(a). *But* a dissent is the first factor for consideration under Tex. R. App. P. 56.1(a)

Screenshots of relevant language: ImageImage
Worst thing SCOTX could do would be to affirm the COA and not the concurrence or dissent. At that point, you'd basically have a remand with "give them every penny they asked for"
Yes. But tbh it was lose/lose filing the first appeal too, we all knew on Day 1 how this opinion would turn out
Art
Explains why you've got a blind guy for an avi I guess
::laughs in 0-35::
Art
Love the General Purpose Public Figure energy here
No, he was in the movie before this one

He got shitcanned for being a sexual predator and pedophile
For Vic, to block him from assaulting other voice actors on the job
If someone wants to handle ordering and shipment, I'm happy to pitch in πŸ˜‚
I did, it's in the thread
This one πŸ™ƒ Image
Pretty good tbh! Ran 5 points ahead of the district's D+36 PVI and outperformed both Donald Trump and Pat McCrory in the district

That was also 6 years ago though. Is this your idea of an insult? πŸ˜‚
(I also didn't owe anyone a half-mil plus in sanctions after I lost πŸ™ƒ)
Yes, I keep the @'s from Vic's CHUDlets in one thread so it doesn't spill out and pollute everyone's TLs like a bunch of one-off replies would

Also makes it easier to remind folks that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and pedophile, colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime
None of us were πŸ˜‚
It does indeed

He'd also need to find new claims to sue over, since this case was dismissed with prejudice and re-filing over the same stuff would be blocked by the doctrine of res judicata
"Still working with Anime Matsuri" is quite the rΓ©sumΓ© point πŸ˜‚
We πŸ‘ deserve πŸ‘ better πŸ‘ enemies πŸ‘
I type it every time, just in case I need to modify it to accommodate character limits πŸ˜‰
Probable. But as studies show, a mark will get mad at the person who exposes the con rather than the con artist
This point right here is the one Vic Mignogna's CHUDlets never seemed to understand

The impotent rage in defense of a sexual predator and pedophile transitioned from "scary" to "f*cking hilarious" years ago. We keep responding b/c the constant salt is entertainment for others
Oops, yeah sorry -- res judicata means you only get to sue once, and once the court has made its ruling you don't get to try again on the same claims
Part of me wonders if anyone working at Twitter ever used the Threadnought for testing purposes, b/c we broke tf out of their threading just a couple weeks in πŸ˜‚
If Ty Beard didn't want to be publicly accused of committing a crime, Ty Beard probably shouldn't have committed notary fraud (a crime)

Signed,
–Texas lawyer publicly accusing another lawyer of a crime
Ty Beard is the same Texas lawyer who swore to the Court that a late filing was because of "technical difficulties," when the metadata for the file showed he was still working on it after the deadline

He's got no problem at all committing crimes, it's how he practices
And committing crimes is how Ty Beard's LOLfirm has always practiced, as well documented by Texas's appellate courts –
➑️ 2015: search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.as…
➑️ 2019: casetext.com/case/goughnour…
➑️ 2022: search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.as…
Nah, my homeowners insurance policy has defamation coverage so I'd just have them hire @TXantislapplaw and help out on occasion
Yes. The appeal was them trying to get out of paying the sanctions $$. The appellate court said "you still have to pay, just pay it to the court instead of the opposing party"
Strongly, yes. Sanctions for discovery abuse are infrequent

But the 2019 case, for example, involved fake subpoenas. So.
Yes
No, I'm saying pretty explicitly that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and a pedophile, he tried to sue two women he assaulted, and the Court of Appeals not only said Vic had no proof they were lying *but also* that it's totally legal as a matter of law to call Vic a predator πŸ™ƒ
I mean they're not *wrong* per se; it's always up to the judgment-creditor (the party who wins) to pursue the debtor (the loser). And Percy helped Vic hide his house & other assets awhile ago

But the idea "just" being documented as a predator means Vic Mignogna won is LOLable
Just $1
Can neither confirm nor deny, any such knowledge would be attorney-client privileged
This hasn't been an original retort since June 2019

Try again. Do better.
Hey man we were at like 9K tweets on Friday, this is a step down 😜
Yeah one of Vic Mignogna's fans tried that one in June 2019 too (see, e.g., )

Do you have *any* original material?
We *deserve* better enemies!
Providing fresh opportunities for me to remind people that Vic Mignogna is a sexual predator and pedophile, colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime?

I know exactly what you're doing 😘
(For the record, I know a *lot* of us went out of our way to actively insult Vic Mignogna's fans – the tweet still made me laugh πŸ₯²)
I doubt his insurer even knows about it tbh

The fact that whoever manages @vicmignogna's Twitter account proactively blocked him from seeing all the lawyers with accurate opinions makes me think they're trying to ensure there's no malpractice claim
Malpractice providers are not made public in Texas, so far as I'm aware
I'm not well-versed on Texas's post-judgment collection processes, that's a @TXantislapplaw question I'm afraid
ENJOY THE COMEDY ON THIS HELLSITE WHILE IT LASTS GOOD SIR
6 June 2019 was Day 1 of the Threadnought, though some of the precursor activities were happening before then
IΓ€ IΓ€ Cth[readnought] fhtagn!
Mine too, made for some great fan art from @BrettLindsay01 Image
Remember back when this all started and the common talking point was that the lawsuit's allegations were gonna be so bad that Sony would quickly settle?

And Nick Rekieta said trying to defend it would be like putting a bunch of money in a pile and setting it on fire?

Fun times
Good luck fighting the Yakuza
The Court of Appeals held that "sexual predator" is a statement of opinion protected by the First Amendment and can never be defamatory. Screenshot below.

(Notably, it's not the first time the Court ruled that way. See, e.g., search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.as… from 2020) Image
For folks interested in a walkthrough of the Court of Appeals opinion, @questauthority has a pair of threads going page by page

➑️ Part 1:

➑️ Part 2:
*Totally unrelated* from the topic of Vic Mignogna being a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime, I guess I'll stay a Texas lawyer for another year 🀠 Image
So first Vic Mignogna's fans sent death threats to the trial judge and posted comments on his long-unused Facebook page when he ruled against their idol

Now they're faxing whiny missives to the Court of Appeals after they LOL'd Vic out of court too πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Image
(For folks who don't remember the trial judge getting bombarded after Vic Mignogna got BTFO'd, the docs Judge Chupp shared from the bench are below)

dropbox.com/s/ixoy10rl0w3a…
Image
My younger self once held out hope that something vaguely resembling a CHUDlet meritocracy would emerge, with better insults materializing with time

I've... been perpetually disappointed
Probably searching for Vic Mignogna or Nick Rekieta and then just spamming anyone they see with a comment
Typically the cost of defending a defamation LOLsuit is covered by renters / homeowners insurance, but I don't have any insight on how the different defendants in this case handled things $$-wise
Ah, so just a generally contemptible person hoping if he white knights for Screech that senpai will notice him
"you just kinda lightly bounce it"
The "it's totally ok, Vic was just lying under oath during his deposition!" defense is a weird one, but run with it I guess? πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Vic Mignogna – a sexual predator and pedophile colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime – truly has the smartest fans
I wish πŸ˜‚

Notice that guy responded today to a tweet from 2019
Correct

You'd need a total idiot of a lawyer with zero defamation experience to not know how that case was going to end
"did he slap the bitch ... he wasn't pulling or yanking"

Vic Mignogna has the best fans
That trademark Nick Rekieta charm

LOLyers gonna LOLyer
Yep. He fleeced Vic Mignogna's fans with nonsense "legal analysis," and now that the Texas Court of Appeals has laughed at him he's moved on to the next controversy before his marks notice how LOLable his past insights were
None. Rekieta doesn't do real law anymore, if he ever did. And the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility doesn't care about what YouTube LOLyers say
You: Vic Mignogna's "not well known or well documented"

The Texas Court of Appeals, occasionally quoting Vic Mignogna: Image
I've offered to leave Vic Mignogna alone several times! Even though he's a sexual predator and pedophile

The only condition was his fans not @'ing me for a contiguous 24-hour period

Here we are, more than 3 years later, with you failing him again

Good talk πŸ‘πŸ‘ Image
Vic Mignogna – the R. Kelly of Anime – is a sexual predator and a pedophile
I've taken to calling it the Streisand-Mignogna Effect

In honor of Vic Mignogna, a known sexual predator and pedophile (colloquially referred to as the R. Kelly of Anime)
Oh they've seen it. Nick Rekieta did a stream saying the 5-year-old was flirting with Vic, that's why he did it
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest

Video clip was linked here:

But the account that shared it was nuked. I'm sure there's an archive somewhere
No no, the video of Vic perving on the 5-year-old is still live

The link in that prior tweet was Nick Rekieta insisting in a livescreech that the 5-year-old was flirting with Vic, that's why he perved on her
For Vic Mignogna – a sexual predator and pedophile, colloquially known as the R. Kelly of Anime – there is no "getting the case put back in"

All 17 claims in his LOLsuit were dismissed with prejudice. Vic appealed. That dismissal was then affirmed unanimously.

That's a wrap
I... didn't even know there was such a thing as a Griftie Award πŸ˜‚

@bykerseven you seen this?
He could try, but 2nd-level appeals are discretionary in Texas – there's no guarantee SCOTX would take the case

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with T. Greg Doucette

T. Greg Doucette Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @greg_doucette

T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Jul 2, 2023
Not here

The facts in the 303 case were stipulated, meaning both sides agreed to them and the Court is required to take them as true for purposes of making its decision

1/
You can have a judgment set aside under Rule 60(b)(2) for "newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered"

But – as the media coverage shows – that evidence *could* have been discovered with reasonable diligence

2/2
 @H2OMocassin
There's no fraud when the State of Colorado agreed to it

Even if were, the deadline for a Rule 60(b)(3) motion to set aside for fraud would have been 1 year after the trial court's ruling -- so that deadline already passed back in 2018
Read 30 tweets
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Jun 13, 2023
::low whistle::

Someone done fucked up
It amuses me to no end that every legal professional involved on the employees' side of this linked together via the Threadnought

It's like an honest-to-God Lawyer Voltronβ„’ assembling to disembowel the bad guy
It is f*cking *hilarious* πŸ˜‚ Esp having seen it blossom from the very beginning

I'm grateful to know them
Read 9 tweets
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Apr 27, 2023
This chart explains a lot πŸ˜‚

I'm also basically alone in the bottom right quadrant πŸ˜”
Maybe. It fits well with my admittedly anecdotal view of election results nationally and locally though
Same, especially since ZIRP
Read 6 tweets
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Apr 27, 2023
Love making it easier for dirty cops to stalk their victims in real-time

wral.com/story/nc-bill-…
These days it tends to be the latter

It's very "Government is good when it has a badge"
These are the cops Republicans in the NC General Assembly are trying to give new warrantless stalking powers to –

Cops committing domestic violence:

Cops committing sex crimes:

Cops committing sex crimes with children:
Read 5 tweets
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Apr 26, 2023
This lawsuit is superbly written

Read it for yourself here: documentcloud.org/documents/2378…

Pour one out for the poor bastard who had to read DeKlantis's memoir for evidence though 🫑
Also, you might recall a certain lawyer mentioned the Takings Clause issue -- which you'll notice is alleged ahead of the First Amendment issues:
That same lawyer also happened to mention the Constitution's Contracts Clause, which you'll also notice is alleged first ahead of the 1A claims πŸ˜†
Read 15 tweets
T. Greg Doucette Profile picture
Apr 5, 2023
::low whistle::
That gives Wisconsin Dems 2 of the 3 branches. And may even jeopardize the Legislature's hard-right gerrymander.

And reduces the likelihood of votes being overturned in 2024

Rs really blew that one
Fair, but I've reached a point where to me the only thing that matters is downstream effects

There will be less sh*tbaggery in WI than there would be otherwise, for at least a brief span of time, and that's a good thing
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(