#PollensAreAirborne
Average pollen size 25 microns, i.e., about 125 times larger than respiratory aerosols carrying pathogens.
He investigated over 80 types of pollens, concluding grasses caused the greatest reaction. He was in correspondence with Darwin:
Darwin asked if there is a difference between plants that pollinate by wind and those that pollinate by insects.
Can pollen be carried large distances in the upper regions of the atmosphere? Blackley wrote on 7 July 1873: "his experiments ... inspired by Darwin’s ... collecting atmospheric dust at Porto Praya" darwinproject.ac.uk/humannature/20…
Darwin: "coniferous pollen deposited on ships, hundreds of miles out in the sea, causing hay fever among sailors who were allergic", even though they are far away from any plants.
Blackley flew kites at different altitudes with sticky slides to sample for pollen. "... in pollen seasons much higher levels were found at 1000-2000 ft than at ground level."
Thus, you have incidences out in the sea or in cities, far away from pollen sources.
#PollensAreAirborne
Average pollen size 25 microns, i.e., about 125 times larger than respiratory aerosols carrying pathogens.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H… Charles Blackley - one of the first persons to understand allergic rhinitis (hay fever) is caused by pollen through extensive self-experimentations - he was afflicted by the allergies as well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
****Why the WHO took two years to say COVID is airborne****
In short: hubris, conservative thinking, group thinking, and the group defending its own. A 🧵 on the Nature article 1/
2. WHO categorically tweeted in March 2020, “FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne,” - shouting out how sure they were about the statement
3. Their recco based on decades-old infection-control teachings. Also included one metre distancing and handwashing and surface disinfection. In the last 6 decades, their understanding of respiratory infections has not evolved
The obsession with returning to "normal" has more to do with collective inertia than any love for "normalcy".
What was so special about the normal we want to return to? And in our fetish for a return, we missed so many opportunities of making things better. A dynamic thread 🧵1/
2/ Flushing toilets is a significant aerosol generating process. The pandemic should have opened our eyes to this. Just put the lid down when flushing, even at your own home. Even if those are your germs, do you really want them all through the home? commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toil…
3/ Outdoor dinning - weather permitting and sometimes, even when weather not exactly permitting. We know how to make ourselves locally warm. All it needed was focus and some investment. Some took the initiative, but largely, we seem to be okay with eating inside stuffy rooms 🙄
One more attempt at making a visual engagement for emphasizing the importance of better masks. This effort was led and culminated by @Its_Airborne - I am too lazy otherwise.
What started with a thread, is now interactive: bettermasks.its-airborne.org
This is a schema intended for two purposes - 1) To give a visual depiction of how much better respirators can be than cloth or surgical masks due to their better fit and filtration.
2) To give a feeling of how things have changed with variants. For example, is cloth masks on everyone gave a certain level of protection with the wild variant, with omicron, you may now need surgical masks with fit adjusters for the same level of protection.
On reaerosolization of stuff from surface of FFPs/N95s
(Stuff being pathogens) in hopital settings
Short thread -
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
For HCWs, the sampled masks did not show presence of SARS-CoV-2 (both inside and outside).
For infected patients, virus detected almost solely on the inside.
So, first, the masks are not just going to have huge deposits of virusols on them, especially in hospital settings where good ventilation leads to great dilution (if you do not have good ventilation in a hospital, do not blame the mask for it)
Let me tell you how "excess deaths" sound in everyday life:
"You know that home around the corner with a name plate of 'XX'?"
"Yes."
"It was named after the lady 'XX'. She passed away last month."
"Covid?"
"Not sure. She might have had Covid some time back"
"You remember your father's colleague 'YY'?"
"Yep, very well. What happened now?"
"He passed away about a week back. Heart failure."
"Ooh, that's sad."
"Oh yes, he had Covid a couple months back, recovered from that but now had a cardiac arrest."
"You know your uncle's friend 'ZZ'?"
"No, not really. Why?"
"He passed away. About six months back."
"Covid? During Delta wave?"
"Who knows? Maybe."
#Covid_19 and #Karma
Let me describe to you the concept of #Karma, as per Hindu philosophy, using Covid - 🧵 1/
2) Karma is not as simple as "as you sow, so you reap". Karma is a lot about causality, along with chaos. Most importantly, actions have consequences.
3) The Karma for this pandemic may have started more than a 100 years back when science overcorrected from miasma to "everything is droplets" - read through papers.ssrn.com/abstract=39041… to understand how the karma of Chapin and droplets affected us