A Black defendant has his convictions reversed by the Oregon Court of Appeals because the DAs excused the only 2 Black jurors over the defense objection & this hasn't made a single local news outlet? Portland murder trial reversed - trial was under then MultCo DA Rod Underhill.
Oregon was the VERY LAST state to stop the racist practice of non-unanimous jury verdicts. COA says in its opinion, "We begin with the axiom, no longer subject to reasonable debate, that racial discrimination in the selection of jurors is harmful."
This should be a big deal.
COA ends with, "That implausibility is evidence of purposeful discrimination which, in light of “all of the circumstances that bear on racial animosity,” leads us to the conclusion that the trial court clearly erred in excusing jurors number 6 & number 9 from the trial jury."
Link to full Court of Appeals opinion in State v McWoods here: cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/search…
The Oregon criminal justice system is in crisis & the Portland Defense Services Commission - which oversees Oregon Public Defense Services - is composed of 6 white men, 1 Black man, & 3 white women (including Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Walters). Where is the diversity?
Diversity matters. WHY is it local Portland news outlets don't see the extreme importance of the McWoods case being reversed for DAs excusing jurors for "racial animosity" in 2018? How many trials has this happened in when the trial atty didn't make as clear a record for appeal?
Oh look! A @maxoregonian story from 2016 on how Black people are overrepresented in each stage of Multnomah County's adult criminal justice system:

oregonlive.com/portland/2016/…
And a 2018 @ACLU_OR tweet regarding then DA Rod Underhill's budget, one that lacked any meaningful direction to reduce racial disparities:
A 2019 story from @conradjwilson "While the rate of people of color in Multnomah County's criminal justice system decreased during the last five years, the rate of people of color in jail increased for all groups except Native Americans," per Burns report
.opb.org/news/article/m…
Rod Underhill was Multnomah County DA from January 2013 to August 2020. What was happening the summer of 2020? The pandemic & #BlackLivesMatter protests that started after George Floyd was murdered. It's important to note things were not rosy for everyone while Underhill was DA.
For every story being run about how unsafe downtown is & how many dissatisfied Multnomah DAs & staffers are quitting the office - compare to old office policy? Like no second look for juveniles who negotiated out of BM11 but sent to OYA, when youth are easiest to rehabilitate.
Take another look at all the above-linked stories & reports on the enormous racial disparity in Multnomah county criminal justice system. Do we have any updates yet on racial disparity?
Bias & prejudice is everywhere - including news reporting - & change is hard & takes time.
Sometimes it's hard to recognize our own bias when our privilege gives us blinders. For ex. I know a number of male attys who are allies & had no idea most of their women colleagues affidavit a certain judge because of sexism. Why would they when it doesn't happen to them?
Which is why having a more diverse PDSC is important. And why in all these talks & meetings & #orleg committees on criminal justice system crisis: not having trial attorneys in the room is a problem. Diversity matters to get the full picture, as well as some practical solutions.
Also why reporters should include context that former DA Underhill quit rather than respond to public protest against racial disparities of office. Like 2014 report Black probationers in MultCo were more than 2x likely to be revoked as white probationers:
urban.org/research/publi…
And this person worked for county NOT the DA's office, but was fired for sharing racial disparity data & Underhill was part of the group upset by data being shared:
portlandmercury.com/news/2017/12/1…
Here's more from @dirquez on the employee being placed on leave initially and includes the entire presentation:
portlandmercury.com/news/2017/12/0…
Here's the entire 2017 presentation on racial disparity in Multnomah County on YouTube it's got slides & is just under an hour:
When Mike Schmidt was working as a Multnomah County deputy district attorney a decade ago, he didn’t notice any racial disparities. “I know what I saw going through the doors,& the majority of cases we processed were male white defendants.” @NickBudnick
invw.org/2017/03/02/the…
The problem is what Schmidt saw was not the reality. "The data he sees now shows that in 2015 the rate of African-Americans being convicted for cocaine possession in Multnomah County was more than 100 times that of white defendants — 116 per 100,000 people versus 1 per 100,000."
This brings us back to bias - specifically implicit bias - which is defined as: a form of bias that occurs automatically and unintentionally, that nevertheless affects judgments, decisions, and behaviors.
The existence of implicit bias is precisely why it is imperative that more diverse voices & perspectives be sought out & included in the ongoing discussions, meetings & committees that are focused on solving Oregon's current criminal justice system crisis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Philips

Rachel Philips Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rachelbusygrl

Jul 13
If PDSC wants to overhaul the system a good first step would be to take the claims of disparate pay by gender & retaliation seriously. After all, attorney Tara Herival won her case against OPDS paying her less in June 2022:
What is the status of the investigation?"Multiple women defense attys have spoken w/ ACLU of Oregon about their experiences...(1) they have faced serious situations of retaliation from OPDS, including multiple situations of retaliation by a leadership-level male employee of OPDS"
"It is extremely concerning that attorneys who are versed in the law and vigorous advocates for their clients are expressing significant levels of fear about sharing [these] concerns," said Sandy Chung, director of @ACLU_OR -- August 2021
portlandmercury.com/news/2021/08/1…
.
Read 13 tweets
Jul 13
If a defendant is being routed through a "social service navigator" that works for the DA - they are working w/ an agency w/ a conflict of interest. This is a terrible idea. Stop throwing $ at DAs & law enforcement!
Prioritize funding public defense & social services.
#orpol
No questions in this article about the studies that show non-prosecution of low-level misdemeanors leads to safer communities. That the court backlog could be immediately reduced by better charging practices by DAs - less overcharging of cases & better settlement offers.
#orpol
DAs are not social workers. Neither are police. What is it going to take to stop throwing $ at LE for issues that there are community-based services for but who lack adequate funding? This 🧵 breaks down juvenile justice reform successes:
#orpol
Read 7 tweets
Nov 13, 2021
Good for the O, now other Oregon legacy media need to stop giving this former DA a platform to spread outright misrepresentations.

Brady material is anything that *might* be exculpatory - admissibility is NOT a factor in whether or not something is Brady material.
In this piece by 2 former DAs there are claims that a police officer having lied about violating rules “had nothing to do with any particular case” & therefore would not be Brady material.

This is flat out WRONG.
Brady material is any evidence favorable to the accused-evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness.
Misconduct by LE, *especially* past dishonesty, is Brady material.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 17, 2021
Oh look OPDS trying to tell attys & public defense providers the 4.5% budget cut is no biggie b/c they'll comply w/ #orleg requirements necessary to release withheld $100 million. Just like they've addressed the issues from the 6th Amendment Center report!
oregon.gov/opds/SiteAsset…
Oh wait, OPDS *hasn't* addressed the problems outlined in the Sixth Amendment Center Report - which came out in December of 2018:
opb.org/news/article/p…
Why does this matter? The budget for the Trial Criminal Division is $186,458,931 to start July 1, 2021.
OPDS ran out of $ for the month of June 2021, so attorneys, investigators, experts are not being paid for completed work, even as they continue to work & go to trial.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 16, 2021
🧵on how Assault II in Oregon is usually charged for perspective on the recent indictment of PPB ofc Budnick of misdemeanor Assault IV.
Media might to ask DA's office for comparable cases where a baton or rod or bat or other item was used & case was indicted as BM11 Assault II:
Assault II carries a mandatory 70 month prison sentence. If DA had charged Assault II that ofc wouldn't be able to negotiate for a dismissal via a civil compromise or setover-sentencing agreement, but with a misdemeanor Assault IV charge, a dismissal is a possible outcome.
Media should ask DAs office for comparable Assault II cases where events captured on video but no visible injuries, no hospital records but case still indicted as BM11. Media should ask DAs office for comparable Assault II cases that *weren't* captured on video & still indicted.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 12, 2021
Oregon Ways & Means voted to decrease funding for public defense by 4.5% today.

In 2018 the Sixth Amendment Center Report said Oregon's public defense system fails defendants & their lawyers. If #orleg wants criminal justice reform then it needs to properly fund public defense.
Oregon was the last state in the country to require unanimous jury verdicts in felony cases.

And the only reason we now have unanimous jury verdicts in Oregon is because of a United States Supreme Court case - Ramos v Louisiana - and not because of the Oregon Legislature.
It has not been a priority for #orleg to ensure that citizens facing the criminal justice system receive due process. Because if it were a priority, the legislature would have voted to change the law & require unanimous juries.
Funding public defense isn't a priority either.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(