Order books are coming to @THORChain which will be the first time we've seen a multichain order book with native assets in DeFi history. Let's dive into what this means, its challenges, and how it benefits THORChain and the entire cryptocurrency as a whole.
Follow the white 🐇🧵
Historically, we haven't seen much for order books in general w/ DeFi. It is currently dominated by CEXs & this is largely due to speed. Most DeFi ecosystems don't have the performance needed for it. Its why dYdX is migrating to #CosmosSDK, & why Serum ($SOL) was built on Solana
But @THORChain's order book design isn't the same as those & is structured quite differently. The biggest difference is that orders are executed against the pools (CLP) of THORChain instead of peer-to-peer. Liquidity comes from the pools + orders, rather than just the orders.
To my knowledge, this is a novel approach in DeFi. But because TC secures external assets, it needs to ensure economic security, unlike ecosystem-specific implementations (ie Serum).
All non-native assets need to be in a liquidity pool, paired w/ $RUNE to keep the network secure
While traders can trade w/ any layer1 native asset, the network internally uses synths to maintain their $$ (& economic security) while the order is waiting to be executed. This means that not only will layer1<>layer1 orders be available, but also will generate 2x the pool yield
This also means that orders that are waiting to be executed will sit as liquidity in the pool (increasing the pool depths) while the yield generated from that liquidity goes to LPs, increasing yield.
Not only do order books increase the pool depths & liquidity, but also increase the trade volume. This is in part of having a more flexible and powerful protocol, but also because it expands THORChain to entirely new classes of trader types.
Single asset yield needs to drop first before this feature can be released, so no ETA as of now but is being actively worked on.
For more detail on the implementation, read the gitlab issue. gitlab.com/thorchain/thor…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How @THORChain can succeed with an algo stable where $UST (and so many others) failed.
Thread time! 🧵👇
$UST failed due to a cacophony of reasons. From multiple pegging mechanisms, which weren't resilient enough. Secondary markets caused the tail the wag the dog. We can even talk about collateralizing with #Bitcoin INCREASED risk.
But for this thread, let's focus on the peg
The peg, in my opinion, is the most important thing. If a peg is never broken, then there is little reason for a "bank run" to occur. I would submit that had the $UST peg never been broken, $LUNA wouldn't have seen hyperinflation.
TLDR: Staking doesn't provide value to others, therefore it can only take yield from unwilling participants (inflation), which then creates a false yield, leaving you with less than you think.
First, we should quickly define it. Staking is locking up a single asset to acquire typically more of the same token. We see this in dPoS networks, for example. This is not to be confused w/ bonding, which is what a validator does to run a node, or LP'ing (bonding/LP 🙅♂️ staking)
Let's first talk about what is a "reasonable good". A reasonable good is one person providing a good/service that another person is willing to pay for. This can be adding capital into an AMM or lending protocol. It can be a node facilitating transfers on a network.
Since adding terra integration, all metrics are up on @THORChain and all of them are ATH! The fundamentals are stronger now than ever before.
* trade volume $88m (layer1 and synth)
* LP yield ($319k a/day)
* node yield near $(173k a/day)
A 🧵 on ILP (impermanent loss protection) on @THORChain. Why can @THORChain do this? What risks does it pose the network?👇
Impermanent loss (IL) is a hot topic in AMMs, and for many of them, it's a really big problem. To be fair, IL experienced on one AMM is the same on another. What makes the difference is how yield is earned by swap fees collected, as these two things are battling each other.
And for @THORChain, its slip based formula is the most effective approach out there for LPs, while also giving cheap fees to 🦐 & larger fees for 🐳. While IL can increase and decrease depending on market movements, yield earned mostly goes up only.
Let's start by defining what a synthetic asset is, and what makes it different than a wrapped asset.
A wrapped asset is collateralized by the asset its wrapping, while a synthetic is collateralized by one more assets (synthesizing an asset from multiple).
Because wrapped assets have no correlation to the security of the network, they can and often exceed the value of the network securing it. THORChain's synthetics are collateralized by the pools, so 50% the asset, and 50% $RUNE.
today, $RUNE’s fundamentals are stronger today than ever before.
1) the network is more decentralized now than ever with the highest number of nodes, which is continuously expanding.
2) the network bond are near ATH high and the pools are deeper than ever.
3) not a single core dev has left the project while there are more full time devs joining, making the dev team stronger than ever
4) the THORChain ecosystem continues to expand launching new websites, projects and communities further cementing the long term growth of the project
with integrations of economic powerhouses like @terra_money , $ATOM, @TokenReactor and much much more coming downstream, which will only drive into value of @THORChain up and up.
5) this dev team along with the greater community has proven to be able withstand even the harshest