Severe autism is not a real concept. What people tend to think is severely #autistic tends to be co-existing disabilities that doctors assume is autism-related, but in reality are not. What people consider to be 'severely autistic' also tends to be discriminatory.
Same goes for functioning labels. There's multiple criteria for high/low functioning that contradict other criteria. They also have nothing to do with functioning. Example: One definition has to do with ability to speak, others have to do with if you have a job or need a schedule
I once watched a video made by someone called "Reframing severe autism" who was considered severely autistic. He revealed what it really was was a co-existing disability that wasn't autism. It was after watching his video that made me come to this conclusion.
Also since my autistic ass completely forgot to credit the guy, I want to tank @stimulacra_ and @ChocToothpaste for linking the video in question.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Thread - Feel free to retweet]
Since #autistic is trending, here's some information for anyone suspecting they're autistic:
- Self DX is valid and supported by many PhD researchers and universities
- The DSM autism criteria is inaccurate and rejected by many PhD scientists
- Most accurate information on autism comes from autistic people, including organizations like @NeuroClastic and @autselfadvocacy
- Most mainstream autism research comes from non-autistic people who spread stereotypes as 'accurate' research (ex: autists lack empathy)
- Autism Speaks is not autism friendly
- Autistic people do not lack empathy, and have been overwhelmingly found to have huge amounts of it
- Most autism research tries to frame everything about us as bad, even the things about us that are arguably good.