Start here: federalregister.gov/d/2022-13734/p…
"proposed § 106.31(a)(2) would make clear that preventing any person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity would . . . be prohibited"
#SaveWomensSports
"proposed § 106.31(a)(2) would make clear that preventing any person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity would . . . be prohibited"
#SaveWomensSports
https://twitter.com/fem_mb/status/1548429826305888256
federalregister.gov/d/2022-13734/p…
This is the paragraph where they say, and I paraphrase: "Oh, women's safety? No, no, dear, you're perfectly safe, let the man into your locker room, sweetie, if you want your school's federal funding."
This is the paragraph where they say, and I paraphrase: "Oh, women's safety? No, no, dear, you're perfectly safe, let the man into your locker room, sweetie, if you want your school's federal funding."
federalregister.gov/d/2022-13734/p…
Link to the instructions on where to leave your comments. #SaveWomensSports
Link to the instructions on where to leave your comments. #SaveWomensSports
ecfr.gov/current/title-…
Link to the existing rule 106.41, which addresses athletics and sex discrimination.
(Personally I'd love to see equal funding required, but apparently that's not something @Biden cares so much about. #SaveWomensSports)
Link to the existing rule 106.41, which addresses athletics and sex discrimination.
(Personally I'd love to see equal funding required, but apparently that's not something @Biden cares so much about. #SaveWomensSports)
ecfr.gov/current/title-…
Rule 106.41 doesn't get changed in this round. Rather, first they are going to establish that men who ID themselves as women have a right to women's spaces or you lose your federal funding. *Then* they'll do another round of rules interpreting 106.41.
Rule 106.41 doesn't get changed in this round. Rather, first they are going to establish that men who ID themselves as women have a right to women's spaces or you lose your federal funding. *Then* they'll do another round of rules interpreting 106.41.
*This* is sexual harassment and discrimination: Forcing women to share a locker room with a male, pressuring them not to protest, and then giving their athletic award to that male.
Title IX should be protecting these young women. But no.
thepostmillennial.com/lia-thomas-nom…
Title IX should be protecting these young women. But no.
thepostmillennial.com/lia-thomas-nom…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
