Why are we not doing more to fight climate change? New study surveys 40k people in 20 countries to understand 1/ what drives support/opposition to important climate policies 2/ how much people know about climate change & 3/ how info can change perceptions scholar.harvard.edu/files/stantche…
Citizens are *very concerned* about climate change and supportive of taking action ⬇️. Yet, governments have set strong climate goals but struggle to implement them. This large-scale international survey sheds light on what matters for increased support 2/N
#surveys are key for understanding people's views on public policies. This survey asks respondents about their characteristics & energy use, knowledge & views on climate policies. It also shows them pedagogical videos on impacts of climate change & how policies work 3/N
Three key concerns determine support for a given climate policy (or lack thereof): 1) is it effective in reducing emissions? ("Effectiveness concern") 2) Will it hurt my household's finances? ("Self-interest") 3) Will it hurt the poor & lower-income? ("Inequality concern") 4/N
This means, among others, that self-interest is by far not the only reason why people support policies. They have broader concerns about their effectiveness and their impacts on others, esp. the poor 5/N
It also means that concerns about climate change are not major predictors of people's policy views (many are already very worried!). Similarly, even though people's knowledge about climate change varies, knowledge is barely correlated with their policy views 6/N
Thus, there is more support for policy designs that are perceived to be more effective and progressive. These include 1/ targeted investment programs (e.g., in green infrastructure or low-carbon technologies) that are financed by progressive taxes or public debt 7/N
2/ carbon taxes but only if revenues are used in a strongly progressive way (cash transfers to the poorest or vulnerable households) or earmarked for green investments 8/N
3/ *in some cases* regulations rather than corrective taxes. For instance: bans on polluting vehicles from city centers & dense areas or mandatory & subsidized insulation of buildings. Shows an equity concern again: people dislike it when some can "pay to pollute." 9/N
Information & explanations work! But only if they actually address the main concerns people have. Thus, showing people info on the impacts of climate change does not change their policy views (people are already worried about climate change) 10/N
What does work? Explaining how a given policy will reduce emissions and that it is progressive (won't hurt low-incomes more than high-incomes) increases support for that policy. 11/N
Who is more supportive of climate action? In general, more educated or left-leaning respondents. Higher income households only in some countries. Younger respondents are not systematically more supportive across countries either. 12/N
Opposition to climate policies is correlated with lower availability of public transportation, more reliance on cars & higher gas expenses. These respondents hold more negative beliefs about the impacts of climate policies on others & the climate, not just themselves 13/N
Yet, it's hard to predict beliefs or policy views based on socioeconomic & lifestyle characteristics only. Not easy to infer people’s policy views from their age, country, gender, education, income, political leanings, or how much they rely on polluting sources of energy 14/N
Are people willing to change their OWN behaviors and adopt more climate-friendly ones? That is a *very different* issue from supporting more PUBLIC policies and obviously depends on current policies. We highlight a relatively limited willingness to make far-reaching changes⬇️15/N
People say they are more willing to change their behaviors if others, especially the rich also change their behaviors. Many, especially poorer, respondents say that financial constraints are a major issue and that they need help to be able to adopt climate-friendly behaviors 16/N
If we had to draw some policy lessons from these results, they would be 1/ make low-carbon alternatives available 2/ ensure vulnerable groups are sheltered 3/ consider earmarking revenues from carbon & other environmental taxes 4/ inform how policies work & who they affect 17/N
Which climate policies generate most support? This figure shows the share of support for a wide range of different climate change policies across 20 countries ⬇️
Share of people across countries who say that climate change is a serious problem and that their country should take action against it ⬇️
Which beliefs are most predictive of support for a given climate policy? 1/ that it's effective (effectiveness concern) 2/ that it wont hurt the poor (inequality concern) or 3/ one's own household (self-interest) Figure shows correlation btw policy support & beliefs on the left⬇️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
📈Inflation is hard to understand! It has complex causes, consequences & trade-offs. Our new paper with @FraNuzzi98 & @Al_Bi99studies how people understand inflation & what they want the government to do to fight it. Short summary thread 🧵👇
1/socialeconomicslab.org/understanding_…
2/ We run a new large-scale survey on US respondents asking people in-depth how they reason about inflation. Our questions are inspired by the theoretical and empirical macroeconomics literature and issues raised in the media. Key findings below:
3/ What do people think causes inflation? Number 1 is government actions, especially foreign assistance for the war. Number 2 is rises in production costs due to COVID, oil prices, and supply chain disruptions. Democrats less likely to blame government but still 60% do.
🚨New paper for @BrookingsInst revisits this long-standing question, already asked by @RobertJShiller in 1997, with current data and survey methods. Some key findings:🧵 1/10 socialeconomicslab.org/research/worki…
Inflation is most definitely not seen as just a “yardstick," but as causing tangible adverse effects. The predominant reason for aversion is clear: People believe that their wages are not keeping up with inflation and that that their living standards are declining. 2/10
The perception that wages don’t keep up with prices is amplified by the belief that wage raises during inflationary periods are not adjustments for inflation but instead due to job performance & progression. This belief is strongest among those who switch jobs during this period
Zero-sum thinking is a key mindset that shapes how we view the world. Excited to share a new paper on the roots and consequences of Zero-sum thinking with @sahilchinoy, @DrNathanNunn @SMGSequeira. A summary thread🧵1/23 scholar.harvard.edu/files/stantche…
What is zero-sum thinking? It’s the belief that gains for one individual or group tend to come at the cost of others. It’s the belief in a “limited good”: if you get a bigger slice of the pie, it means that I must get a smaller one. 2/23
We dive into the historical roots of zero-sum thinking and its impact on political views. Using a new large-scale survey of U.S. residents, we collect data on people’s stances on policy issues, measures of zero-sum thinking, and their detailed ancestry and family histories. 3/23
A fascinating and little-known fact about U.S. history🇺🇸: The U.S.once relied heavily on a tax system, strikingly similar to a wealth tax, that played a key role in fueling its growth and development. A thread diving into the intriguing history of the General Property Tax.🧵
2/24: A summary of this history, based on invaluable work by economic historians, is in our new paper with @landais_camille & @sachajdray here: . #EconTwitter https://t.co/JmTaRBki0Zscholar.harvard.edu/stantcheva/fil…
3/24: At the turn of the 19th century, a comprehensive and sophisticated wealth taxation system emerged in the US. It was quite unique and different from tax systems in European countries at the time.
1/19: Excited to share a paper on how people perceive & understand trade and trade policies!
Which factors shape the support for different trade policies? Thread below with the key takeaways #EconTwitter 🧵, and full paper here: scholar.harvard.edu/stantcheva/fil…
2/19: The study tackles two key questions: what do people know about the impacts of trade? And, how do they weigh trade-offs when forming their views on trade policy? We conducted large-scale surveys and experiments in the US at the Social Economics Lab socialeconomicslab.org
3/19: In discussions of trade policy, it's important to think about both trade restrictions (e.g., tariffs or quotas) and compensatory redistribution to help those hurt by trade (e.g., retraining programs, direct transfers to displaced workers, support for low-income households).
Are you interested in running your own surveys to answer important questions? I often get asked to share best practices & advice. So I decided to write a comprehensive "how to" guide covering the complete survey process from beginning to end: scholar.harvard.edu/files/stantche…
Surveys are an essential approach for eliciting otherwise invisible factors such as perceptions, knowledge & beliefs, attitudes & reasoning. These factors are critical determinants of social, economic & political outcomes.
Surveys are not "just a research tool." They are also not only "a way of collecting data." Instead, they involve creating the process that will generate the data. This allows the researcher to create their own identifying and controlled variation. This is exciting and invaluable!