Multiple videos shows thermite incendiaries falling on densely populated civilian areas of central Donetsk – a clear war crime, as such munitions are banned from usage against civilian targets. But this incident raises more questions than answers. /1
Thermite is a pyrotechnic mixture of metal powder and metal oxide. It burns at up to 2,200°C (4,000°F). It can't be smothered or be extinguished by water. It can melt through steel and causes horrendous injuries – 5g of burning thermite on the skin can incapacitate a person. /2
It's packed into 9M510 hexagonal magnesium prisms, each 40 mm long by 25 mm wide, which are explosively ejected from 9M22S unguided rockets fired from Grad or Tornado rocket launchers. The rockets have a range of 20 km (12 miles). Each contains 180 thermite elements. /3
There have been many instances during the Ukraine war when Russian forces have used 9M22S rockets against Ukrainian targets, including civilian targets. This attack in Mariupol clearly shows thermite munitions being used against the Azovstal works. /4
The latest thermite attack, however, raises some puzzling questions. It appears to have targeted the capital of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). This is the first incendiary attack I've seen against a Russian or separatist target in this war. /5
This wasn't a single rocket gone astray. Videos giving a wider view show a lot of submunitions falling, though not as many as would be expected from a full salvo of 40 9M22S, which would disperse 7,200 submunitions. /6
The location of the attack also wasn't marginal – it was right in the middle of Donetsk city, in the Voroshylovskyi and Kalininskyi districts. This is at least 10 km from the nearest front line, so it's very unlikely this was the result of an attack falling short. /7
Nobody has claimed responsibility for the attack. The local separatist government in Donetsk has issued a statement claiming that Ukrainian forces fired three Grad rockets into central Donetsk. /8 sana.sy/en/?p=278639
This would be consistent with the number and area of the individual submunitions seen in the videos. One rocket can disperse over an area of 80 x 80 m (6,400 sq m). Three rockets would account for 540 submunitions, which looks about right for the videos. /9
So who was responsible for the attack? Ukrainian responsibility can't be ruled out. The Ukrainians have 9M22S rockets in their arsenal as part of the Soviet inheritance. They have been used at least once before, in Ilovaisk in 2014. /10 vice.com/en/article/a38…
Donetsk city is also well within the 20 km range of Ukrainian Grad multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) equipped with 9M22S. So it's physically possible for the Ukrainians to have carried out the attack. /11
However, I've seen no evidence or previous claims that the Ukrainians have used 9M22S on any occasion during the current war. The Ukrainians seem to have fought this war pretty 'cleanly' overall, in contrast to the Russians. So I rate this as a low likelihood. /12
The Russians have used 9M22S on many well-documented occasions, including in Mariupol, Kharkiv, Zolote and most recently in Mariinka near Donetsk on 17 July (below) and several previous occasions.
The Russians are doing so in full awareness that using incendiaries against civilian areas is forbidden by international conventions, as intercepted phone calls have shown. The Ukrainians seem to be keen to stick to international law. /14
The attacks on Mariinka show that there is clearly at least one Grad battery equipped with 9M22S near Donetsk, which has been used within at least the last 10 days. But it's very unlikely that it would be firing rockets over Donetsk city. /15
An unknown quantity is the identity of the battery's operator. It's most likely the Russians given the use of 9M22S elsewhere including Kharkiv, but it can't be excluded that the 'Donetsk People's Rupublic' controls it. They have their own Grads. /16
As this map shows, Mariinka is south-west of Donetsk city centre. The Grads hitting Mariinka are likely firing from the countryside somewhere around Luhanske and Olenikva, or east of there. There's no reason why they should be east of Donetsk city or be fired over the city. /17
I should add that from the videos that have been posted, I couldn't guess which direction the rockets came from. We only seem to see the submunitions after they've been ejected, following which they fall vertically. /18
So it's very unlikely that the Grads that hit Donetsk were fired over the city and fell short, or that they were misaimed. Firing from their positions south of the city would have required a 90 degree change in direction from targeting Mariinka. /19
It's also unlikely that the rockets were shot down over the city. There have been no reports of air defences engaging incoming missiles. Nor were they fired for 'illumination' given that the city is not blacked out. /18
I think we can therefore conclude from the above that:
1) The Ukrainians have the capability but don't appear to have used 9M22S in this war, suggesting they likely don't have the intent to do so. Likelihood of responsibility: low /19
2) The Russians and the 'DPR' have the capability, they've repeatedly used 9M22S in the war, and they've carried out several 9M22S attacks near Donetsk, including within the last 10 days. /20
3) The attack was most likely deliberate, but its purpose can only be guessed at. It may have been intended as a 'false flag' to try to bolster propaganda claims that Ukraine is intent on "genocide" in the Donbas. /21
4) Why not a full salvo? That may have been intended to limit the damage being caused on the ground (which was likely not trivial anyway, given the nature of the weapon). /22
5) Given the combination of Russia's record, capabilities and nearby confirmed use of 9M22S, I think the likelihood is high that this was a deliberate attack by Russia or its proxies on its 'own people'. /end
Pictures from Donetsk of burned-out remnants of thermite submunitions:
An interesting snippet giving an insight into what it's like to be hit by a #HIMARS strike:
(R2): We came, we now live here with scouts, two days ago they had an arrival in their building. Some shit that you cannot hear arriving. It just whistles for two seconds, then bam-bam!/1
(Parenthetical note: HIMARS rockets hit at a speed of about Mach 2.5. The first thing likely to be audible from a HIMARS impact will be the explosion, as they're travelling far faster than sound - much like the old German V2s.)
1/ The war in Ukraine has been a disaster in many regards, but the divisions and destruction inflicted upon the Orthodox Church have been particularly grievous. In this final 🧵, I'll look at the role that Orthodoxy has played in the Ukraine war.
2/ For the first part, on the Russian Orthodox Church's relationship with the Russian state, see:
More on bridge-busting: an update to a thread I posted two months ago on the likelihood of Ukraine being able to take down the Crimea/Kerch bridge (actually bridges) with the US-made HIMARS rocket artillery system. /1
In the thread, I noted the difficulty of taking down bridges from a distance with anything short of a large laser-guided bomb. Note that the long-range ATACMS rocket that HIMARS can fire only has a 500 lb / 247 kg warhead - 1/4 of the weight of a 2,000 lb BLU-109/MK 84 bomb. /2
Ukraine doesn't appear to have been given any ATACMS missiles yet. It does however have M31 guided missiles, which have an even smaller warhead (200 lb / 90.7 kg). And we now have direct evidence of how well it performs against a bridge. /3
Remember those 'biolaboratories' that Russia claimed the US had secretly built in Ukraine (a claim that originated with the US far right)? They're actually being used to create mutant Ukrainian super-soldiers, according to a bonkers report published by Kommersant. /1
The Russian parliament has established a 'parliamentary commission for investigating the activities of US biolaboratories on the territory of Ukraine'. Not surprisingly, it's come up with some startling preliminary findings. /2
According to co-chairs Konstantin Kosachev and Irina Yarovaya, analyses of the blood of captured Ukrainian servicemen shows they have been subjected to "secret experiments" which resulted in their transformation into "the cruelest monsters". /3
@KentSorensen6 Let's do some figures here, shall we? In 1991, Ukraine's Air Force inherited from the USSR 6 brigades and 4 regiments of S-300s, plus some extra S-300s assigned to the Ukrainian army. /1
@KentSorensen6 A single brigade may have a hundred or more launchers and more than 400 missiles. A regiment has up to 48 launchers with 192 missiles between them. So those 6 brigades and 4 regiments potentially account for over 3,000 S-300 missiles in Ukraine alone. /2
@KentSorensen6 Now consider that Russia inherited the bulk of the USSR's equipment, and that the system has been in use for over 40 years with more than 20 variants of missiles. It certainly has far more launchers and missiles than Ukraine. /3
News that Russia is firing S-300 surface-to-air missiles (Ukrainian example shown below) at ground targets is producing quite a lot of comments along the lines of 'OMG Russia is desperate'. I think that view is mistaken. A short 🧵. /1
It's easy to picture a surface-to-air missile: it's a ground-launched rocket that flies at extremely high velocity to target and destroy enemy air vehicles. But the Russians did things a bit differently with the S-300. /2
Designed in the late 1960s and 1970s, the S-300 uses over 20 missile variants. Russia currently uses the 5V55K, 5V55R, and 48N6 missiles with high-explosive fragmentation warheads weighing up to 144 kg. /3