#संस्कृतम् - Incredible flexibility of the देवभाषा।

Pancharatram is a Mahabharata based play by Bhasa involving Pandavas & Kauravas

The first stanza goes thus

द्रोणः पृथिव्यर्जुनभीमदूतो
यः कर्णधारः शकुनीस्वरस्य
दुर्योधनो भीष्मयुधिष्ठिरः स
पायाद् विराडुत्तरगौऽभिमन्युः।
For those who find it difficult to read Samskritam with Sandhi, the terms in the invocatory verse are

द्रोण - पृथिवी - अर्जुन - भीम - दूत - य - कर्ण - धार - शकुनी - ईश्वर - दुर्योधन - भीष्म - युधिष्ठिर - स - पायाद् - विराड् - उत्तरग - अभिमन्यु
The नान्दी or the invocatory verse says this

👇🏼
But, at first read, the verse seems to talk about the dramatis personae!

In fact no less than 12 of them!
👇🏼
Drona
Krishna
Arjuna
Bhima
Virata
Karna
Shakuni
Duryodhana
Bhishma
Yudhishtir
Abhimanyu
Virata’s Son
Virata’s cows😀

How is this possible? How is the poet doing this?
Lets take a look at a master’s amazing ability to convey multiple meanings in संस्कृतम्!

Poets typically give a hint of what’s to come in the introductory verse. This is termed ‘mudra’ - सूच्यार्थसूचनं मुद्रा प्रकृतार्थपरै पदैः।

Here Bhasa goes all out with शब्दश्लेषः (puns)।
The poet Bhasa creates an appropriate invocation while also signaling the names of various characters who are going to come in his play!

He does his magic while making sure ‘meaning’ is appropriate & also fully in a meter- Vasantatilaka!

Talk about skills 🔥

Lets break it up
द्रोण- also means black. द्रोणकाकः।

Hence कृष्णः

अर्जुनभीमदूतः - messenger to Arjuna & Bhima

कर्ण- also means rudder/helm

कर्णधार- one who controls

शकुनी- also means a bird

शकुनीश्वर - king of birds (Garuda)

दुर्योधन - means a warrior difficult to vanquish. Hence Krishna
भीष्मयुधिष्ठिर are used as adjectives for Krishna here

भीष्म - terrible when offended

युधिष्ठिर - one who is steady in fighting

विराज् - to shine विविधं राजभानत्वाद् विराट्

उत्तरगः - doing the best thing / going to the best

अभिमन्यु - who goes towards a sacrifice
So the full meaning of the invocation is
The source material: Pancharatra edited by Shivaram Paranjape
So the master poet has used शब्दश्लेषः to not only convey a wonderful invocation, but also pushed in multiple character names

Samskritam is a wonderful language

If you can’t access it to enjoy the vast riches, then you are missing something भोः।

पठतु संस्कृतम्। जयतु भारतम्।

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with प्वालः । pvaal

प्वालः । pvaal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pvaal2

Jul 24
This thread by @dxrsam_0 is a good one to highlight Indological shenanigans in ‘historicizing’ पुराणम् & इतिहासः - thereby stripping out all that is sacred

Indology wants to destroy something explicitly designed for मोक्षप्राप्तिः & convert it to a sterile academic quibble
The traditional भारतीय view on पुराण/इतिहास is quite clear

Unlike western epics, इतिहासः are explicitly designed to embody Dharma & helping one move towards Moksha

Vedas are प्रभुसम्मित while Puranas are SuhrdSammita (instructions of a friend) & Kavyas are KantaSammita
Indology claims ALL texts are corrupted

However, traditional Indology process of stripping out ‘layers’ & additions via ‘text historic criticism’ to find the ‘original’ has been beaten to death

See below for historical context
Read 15 tweets
May 18
An excellent illustration of how today’s educated Indians are cut off from our own roots via lack of exposure to own cultural knowledge & access to संस्कृतम् !

विश्लेषणं करिष्यामः।

Claim:
Rajatharangini records wide-spread destruction of Viharas

Bonus:
Dollop of sarcasm😀
Where might be the potential sources of such a claim?

E.g: Marxist historian D N Jha claims this ‘historical fact’ in Against the Grain

Referred by Ajaz Ashraf in Scroll.in warning us re: how school children can learn about ‘Religious Violence in Ancient India”
Jha refers to 2 kings जलौकः & नरः {Jalauka।Nara} against whom Rajatarangini documents ‘solid proof’ of religious violence

This taints the entire ‘hindutva’ project to this day! ह हन्त!🤡😂

Lets go to the originals & check what Kalhana himself says about these Hindutva fiends!
Read 10 tweets
Apr 26
शृङ्खलार्थं QT करोमि।

महोदय, given varying interpretations of “science”, may be meaningful if you describe why you think Linguistics is ‘science’ (or not)

Re: महर्षिः पाणिनिः characterized as ->पाणिनिं सूत्रकारं च within व्याकरणशास्त्रम्।

‘scientist’ would be a modern claim!
Language ‘relationships’ certainly exist

Vertical evolutions & horizontal mixing definitely occur

Language ‘family’ notion while OK, risks concept over-extension into ‘in & out’ groups in real world!

cf “Dravidian vs Aryan” driven by linguistic notion of water-tight families
Definition of ‘language’ families & origin hypothesis frequently leads to absurd positions in the real world where Sanskrit & Kannada/Malayalam are conceptually less inter-related/alien than say Sanskrit & Albanian or Welsh

So linguistic family as a pure academic notion -OK
Read 5 tweets
Apr 24
कुशाग्रपतङ्गयोर्मध्ये संलापः।
प्रथमसोपानम्।😂
आगामिसोपानम्। 🤣
Read 4 tweets
Apr 17
Debate is getting into kicchdi territory now 😀

To bring focus & semblance of rigour

१ Debate is NOT about the academic topic of linguistics per se

२ Not also on whether ‘language families’ exist

Debate is on LINGUISTICS basis of current cultural / civilizational claims
Debate is whether an “invading culture” speaking a “foreign language” came in,enslaved natives & wiped out all earlier linguistic evidence (toponyms etc) over a huge swathe of land causing a FUNDAMENTAL cultural schism that continues till today in modern India

Aryan Vs Dravidian
PIE Linguistics aims to substantiate AIT thesis by claiming

१ Language transmission= people transfer

२ Language families= ‘Fundamentally Different’ groups of cultures

३ Language ->Conquest/Cultural Hegemony

४ Movement from OUT to IN->Dravidian in North pushed to extreme South
Read 10 tweets
Jan 24
Of Men, Mice & Languages!

Inspired by the thread below, I am pleased to share the fruits of my labour!😀

Presenting my AMT - Aryan Mouse Theory*!

आर्यमिश्रान् विज्ञापयामि अस्मिन् विषये।

While this may seem in jest, the data👇🏼shown is all valid

[*channeling my inner Witzel}
As the screenshot shows, the word for Mouse is remarkably conserved across multiple languages

German - Maus
Dutch - Muis
Swedish - Musen
Russian - myš’
Czech - Myš
Polish - Mysz
Bulgarian - miškata
Slovenian - Miška

Samskritam मूषिकः । Mushika | Mushaka
Here is a list of 70+ languages with the word for ‘Mouse’

In fact, total list may be 100+ languages!

Quite remarkable!

But why?

Mice & humans in fact, go a long way back

The history of origin & spread of Mouse is an important clue to the spread of human beings & languages
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(