thread in response to k4mil1aa’s thread about johnny depp and amber heard because it’s completely misleading and fails to recognize research on this exact topic, despite trying to frame it as informative.
this study analyzed women’s shelters or participants who said they were abused, which is not representative of community samples. so yes, when a woman is being abused, self-defense may not be uncommon, but that’s not what we’re talking about,
because the subject at hand is talking about a man being a victim, not to mention that when a man is a victim people commonly excuse the woman’s violence by saying it was self-defense, which contradicts studies showing the opposite.
in a sample of 825 respondents, 23% of cases couples of cases reported that the husband alone was violent, and 28% reported the wife alone.
in another study, more women than men had been physically violent towards their partners.
+ more
there are over 300 studies now that find that men and women are equally likely to be perpetrators of violence. & it’s known that research showing gender symmetry in abuse or women being the perpetrators of violence at rates higher than men, it's suppressed or data is manipulated.
interesting that she also said that of all the DV victims, 85% women & 15% men. yet it's well known that the NCVS survey doesn’t accurately represent IPV. many people report the results of the NISVS. her coalition reports the NISVS in an info sheet, so why not report that?
the power and control wheel stems from the duluth model, a model that failed to recognize men as victims, the same model that was discredited by one of its own creators, admitting to its limitations.
this model of abuse was not made by psychologists, nor is it based on research. not only is there gender symmetry in abuse, studies that have been done trying to see if this patriarchal model of abuse is accurate find no link between patriarchal attitudes and abusive men
"power and control" a study that focused on both women and men as abusers, women who were abusive used violence as a form of control more than men and to feel more powerful.
again, the power imbalance has been shown time & time again to not be an accurate representation, want to see an example as to why? women who are abusive are reported to take advantage of gender stereotypes, knowing they’re more likely to be believed,
and at times goading their victim into retaliation as self-defense done by men is highly stigmatized. (e.g., headbutting incident)
which is why men tend to not strike back, rather, they try & leave the room (AH supporters said this was abusive btw) which is what JD said multiple times in audio, he leaves the room bc he doesn’t want to keep getting hit (AH also admitted to striking him if he tried to leave.)
another study showing how the widely incorrect stereotype results in male victims being further victimized, it facilitates and enables women’s abuse, especially in courts, which is why legal and administrative IPV is something that is seen to be more unique to men.
they use any form of self-defense or reaction to their benefit even if it leaves a small mark, bc they have that as “evidence” in the case that can’t control them anymore so they can further their abuse allegations.
this leaves many male victims without control, having to take the abuse and punches. men report often feeling powerless due to this.
in a study 67.2% reported that they falsely accused them, 38.7% reported that they filed a restraining order under false pretenses. AH said multiple times that the reason she said she was abused was to get the TRO in order to get the penthouses.
you guys use the kicking incident. why do you guys ignore the fact that on audio, johnny depp said he didn’t kick her on the plane, in which amber heard says “I know”
+ a thread on the kicking incident
you guys use the headbutting, where JD has always maintained that he accidentally knocked heads with her because he tried to keep her from hitting him, we know that she gets physically violent with him (as she said, as others witnessed, as shown in audios)
in the audio, he uses her words, “i headbutted you (he always considered it knocking heads & always said it happened) in the forehead, that doesn’t break a nose” and she also said “I don’t think you were aware” why wouldn’t he be aware if it was intentional as she states today?
people saw AH being physically violent with JD w/o JD doing anything, admitted to it multiple times, there's an audio of her hitting him, she's gotten arrested for DV, kate and david spoke out, but all of this, is ignored.
"don't tell me what it feels like to be punched"
yet she doesn't say anything about him punching her
they try to shift the focus away from the evidence. they try their best to control the narrative by turning off comments and blocking people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
amber kept trying to have johnny have an IME even though he didn’t claim any psychological or physical injury in response to her op-ed. so there was no reason to for the IME, thats them saying that. in fact, it reveals the lengths she'll go to shame and harass.
4:10: when the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, the court may order a physical or mental exam
they were saying the requirements to show they dont apply. he didnt say he suffered psychological/physical injury due to her statements.
society: men get abused way less, so we dont talk about them as much
w a lot of men ive known, when i ask if theyve been abused, they say no. when i ask if theyve been hit, kicked, slapped, etc. unprovoked many say yes.
how can they recognize abuse if they were never taught to.
you know how '85% victims of DV are women' always gets thrown around? that's a key sign to tell if a 'domestic abuse expert' is biased. because that statistic comes from a crime victim survey, it's not commonly used, as it's inaccurate in reflecting victims of any gender.
but especially men, if they have a hard time seeing IPV as abuse, and then you go and frame IPV as a crime? widely underreported.
as a study found that phrasing questions about partner assaults in the context of criminal assaults reduced the reporting of partner assaults by 83%
read their thread. what theyre doing is damage control, & its obvious.
amber heard supporters are trying to make it seem as if the information theyre sharing is true & as if theyre combating that misinformation w threads & pointing fingers at tiktok, this is why 🧵🪡🧵🧶🧵🧶🧶
they have the MSM media on their side, they try & frame it as a good thing, trying to increase their credibility, the MSM is known to use tactics to spread misinformation. it focuses on appealing to people’s emotions in order to keep them from thinking logically & critically
the headlines that so many articles use and put as the central topic involve instilling fear in others, telling survivors of IPV that they won’t be believed because of the johnny and amber trial, that no amount of evidence is enough, that it’s a gag order on women,
there’s a reason theyre currently trying to attack the credibility of johnny’s supporters, insinuating that we’re lying while trying to direct the attention to cocaine’s and kamilla’s threads. rather than directly acknowledging & debunking our “lies” as they so confidently claim.
#Distraction saying that deuters said johnny “cut himself” so it must mean that he did it himself. even though he quite literally stated “they didn’t know how” at first.
“they began making threads in support of AH, giving the impression that theyre sharing full and factual evidence, but in reality manipulating the evidence presented and remaining completely biased”
“the threads JD supporters supporters make are combating that misinformation
“openly showing both sides of the discussion, AH supporters fail to mention any evidence we show. The little they do mention to try and “debunk” JD supporters are incidents that they rarely ever mention when they talk about her being abusive, you can make a whole thread-
amber heard ppls move rn is shifting the attention to texts rather than the actual focus: the relationship between amber & johnny depp in relation to abuse, where docs showed her (again) admitting multiple times that she was the perpetrator of violence.
you’ll show that she isolated him from his friends by initiating violence and they’ll divert the attention till you’re suddenly left arguing about whether or not johnny depp doctored a photo of his finger injury since apparently it’s probable to have your finger cut twice
they never directly respond to the evidence, they have to put the attention somewhere else.
to talk about everything else, you have to get to the center of the dynamics first. who’s been shown multiple times to be the perpetrator w evidence. amber, physically violent unprovoked