If it was, you could expect the whole thing to behave in a certain way, and respond to prevention similarly.
It probably won’t.
There will be some factors that are reversible. Those will respond well to prevention, such as timely, effective boosters.
There will be some things that are either irreversible, or so slowly reversible that it doesn’t make much difference. The deterioration of these will be slowed by effective boosters, but not stopped, and they will accumulate.
Finally, it is probable that some of the problems may be progressive. In particular I am thinking about the neuro inflammation that appears to be ongoing for months and therefore inflicting ongoing damage.
It’s possible that any further insult may accelerate these.
Second assumption.
That we will indeed be able to access timely boosters for all age groups as well as early antivirals.
Hmmm…
Third assumption. That the boosters will be timed well with infections.
If you are unlucky and always manage to get your infection 6 months after your last booster… it may not be so good for you if the waning pattern we are seeing is the same in the future.
Then there are grey rhino events. (Sudden worse strain, sudden vaccine escape, sudden failure of immune system to respond for any reason from another intercurrent illness or injury, sudden failure of health systems (war, poverty etc)).
Long COVID will eventually be broken down into systems and lots of diagnoses. Pathological mechanisms. Then hopefully treatments.
Each diagnosis will have its own prognosis etc.
For me, I think the best way to be certain to prevent disease accumulation due to COVID is to try to avoid (re)infections.
Should also point out that severity of COVID is associated with one group of complications, often caused by fulminant organ damage, but there is a different thing that happens after mild or even asymptomatic COVID-19.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don’t just mean health resources either. Everything is slower and deplete of workers due to sick leave, long term illness, carer duties, deaths, and some jobs have become frankly undesirable.
The expected benefits of ventilation and masks in essential services would be to reduce Reff and save lives.
How much… you have to do it to find out, because it hasn’t been done before.
We have to build this plane while flying. No room for excess baggage.
SARS-CoV-2 does not have the required safety profile to administer it as a population level intervention to attempt to achieve “hybrid immunity”.
SARS-CoV-2 has serious adverse effects including neuro-inflammation and heart failure in the target population.
It is too transmissible. It circulates at high prevalence, persistently, and it readily transmits into vulnerable groups and we remain unable to prevent this.
It does not provide the intended outcome either. There is no evidence thus far of meaningfully durable immunity.
Vulnerable people could enjoy life more, have more social contact, go out more…
IF WE CUT DOWN TRANSMISSION.
It shouldn’t be a decision between do you want to die, or do you want to be alone!
Respirators, HEPA. Community action through government!
At the moment we have a bunch of do-gooders sipping lattes, unmasked, indoors, spreading disease, and at the same time saying other people have to die if they want human contact!
This is psychotic!
There are many different ways to be kind and loving to vulnerable people without killing them with your breath.
If adenovirus, HHV6 and AAV2 are all behaving differently to before… it leaves me with more questions than answers…
I think more study is needed on this interesting finding. ->
These are not the only pathogens potentially behaving differently lately, and it’s difficult to escape the fact that the one unifying underlying reason that these things may be occurring is because the host has changed.
I’m not talking about the paediatric hepatitis itself right now. I’m talking more generally.
The hepatitis is behaving like an immune phenomenon, and responding to immunosuppression… ->
This morning on abc radio, a snapshot of the CSIRO report that looks at the challenge of governments communicating with people in the days of SoMe and misinformation…
Hypothetically, of course, what if the government gets it wrong?
Then what?
The usual thing to do is to write to the government, in a private letter, whatever the problem might be…
Let’s just say, hypothetically, that has been tried…
Tricky, isn’t it?
We have to maintain peaceful society and we also have to maintain trust.
One of the suggestions on the radio program was stepping up government use and presentation of up to date data. I heartily agree! We need to keep pace with *global* data.