Something to consider. The @CDCgov and @WHO's contact trace methods are based on direct contact.
They wouldn't know how to use the Gesundheit 2 to save @DrTedros's reputation. Or how to do full traces, including everyone in the room. Or in the next room.
To use smoke.
So, all of those epi studies?
About as useful as @RWalensky 's magical 5 day isolation policy, when trying to rule out airborne transmission.
How about this? You nay-sayers, explain the origin of the 6 foot distance rule. The 15 minute transmission rule used today.
I can explain where they come from, can you?
Sorry if I am being aggressive.
We have sat around for far too long. I am calling it like I see it, and it's all self-reinforcing bullshit.
I am talking directly to you, John Conly and others of his ilk.
Get out of the damn way.
Let me show you what I mean by self-reinforcing.
In this fascinating treatment of a lost case of Marburg, the authors explore how the wife got infected.
Ah, it's that time of year again. The pitter patter of children's feet. The laughter of high school students as they flirt with each other.
The coughs of their parents.
Is a Portable Air Cleaner (PAC) on a desk aimed at the wee ones' faces going to protect them?
TLDR? No. They need to be in a N95 or KF94 purchased from legit distributors, not from Amazon, and eat their food outdoors, spaced far enough away from their friends so as not get infected. Or use @sipmask and protein shakes at lunch in the cafetaria.
You need to teach them
about how it can take as little as one breath of uncleaned-air to get infected (100 virions study on my profile). How it can mess them up in terms of their entire body.
You need to have the "Birds and the Bees and Covid" talk, in other words.