/1 🔔PART 2: AFL has uncovered collusion between the CDC and Big Tech to censor free speech regarding COVID-19.
Facebook & CDC collusion ⤵️:
Direct engagement between CDC officials & social media companies where CDC sends links to Facebook to flag those posts as disinformation
/2 💰$15,000,000 dollars worth of Facebook ad credits as “non-monetary gift” to HHS and CDC on vaccines, social distancing, travel, and priority communication messages–potentially in violation of the Antideficiency Act’s limitation on voluntary services.
/3 CDC requests to help ensure “verifiable information sources” are not blocked because State Department of Health posts were being blocked as vaccine misinformation.
/4 Set up a COVID-19 Misinformation Reporting Channel for CDC and Census to make reports to Facebook, and holding a “training meeting” for the Misinformation Reporting Channel.
/5 Feeding CDC with Facebook-sponsored research on the COVID-Vaccine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨BREAKING — AFL is taking Alvin Bragg back to court.
We just filed a new petition in the New York Supreme Court to EXPOSE his politically motivated prosecution of President Trump.
🧵👇
/2 Last year, AFL filed a lawsuit against District Attorney Alvin Bragg over records requested from his office related to the prosecution of President Trump.
Bragg’s office has refused to provide the records and issued sweeping exemptions to keep the truth hidden.
🚨BREAKING — AFL has filed a federal lawsuit against Shell USA, Inc. for allegedly orchestrating a racially discriminatory reorganization targeting white employees.
This is a major fight against DEI mandates gone wrong.
/2 The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, claims Shell’s radical diversity, equity, and inclusion policies violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Experienced security professionals with top credentials were pushed out to meet “diversity” quotas.
/3 AFL’s clients — loyal, high-performing employees — were forced to reapply for their own jobs, undergo in-person assessments, and compete against less qualified candidates just to “diversify” the workforce.
/3 Our brief argued that the entire case against President Trump should be dismissed, warning that James’s lawsuit was wholly political, undermined the rule of law, and served as yet another example of weaponized lawfare against President Trump.