Here are #methane details:

- $850M to EPA for methane monitoring/mitigation
- Fee at $900/t in 2024 going up to $1500/t in 2026.
- EPA methane regs compliant facilities exempt if equivalence can be demonstrated
- EPA required to update inventory estimates in 2 years
Here's the thing:

$900/t CH4 in 2024 is ~$17/mcf of gas, roughly 2x current Henry Hub price. That's a strong incentive for #methane reductions.

$1500/t CH4 is ~$29/mcf. These high prices will incentivize operational changes (e.g., switch gas engines to electric drive motors).
Fees applied to emissions intensities over:
- Production: 0.2% of gas, 10 mt/mbbl of oil
- Transmission: 0.11%
- LNG & other facilities: 0.05%

Only facilities reporting to EPA (>25000 mt CO2e/year emissions) will be subject to #methane fees.
Here's what this means: These emission thresholds (<0.2%) are low - proving it is going to take a LOT more than 1/yr or even 4/yr aerial surveys.

To get 0.2% within 10% error means you will likely need quasi-continuous monitoring.

See variability here: chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxi…
Key clause: If facilities comply with upcoming EPA #methane regs & demonstrate equivalent reductions, they will be exempt from #methane fees.

How do you demonstrate that? Unclear.

But given high fees, likely to be much cheaper to comply with EPA regs.
The most important part is the requirement for EPA to update #methane inventory in 2 years, using data from direct measurements. This is critical to bridge gap between inventory & measurements. I will have more to say on this soon, but see our recent work: nature.com/articles/s4146…
We will likely see a race to lowest #methane emissions from operators. We were already going in that direction as demand for #certified gas increases globally. Large buyers don't like to pay more & will prefer low-emissions suppliers.

I talk about it here:houstonchronicle.com/business/energ…
You know what's interesting?

If O&G producers achieve #methane leakage shown here, #hydrogen produced using NG and CCS (blue #H2) will be eligible for production tax credits if life cycle emissions <4 kg CO2e/kg H2.

<1% methane leakage will achieve this. pubs.rsc.org/en/content/art…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with arvind p. ravikumar

arvind p. ravikumar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arvindpawan1

May 23
🚨New Paper Alert🚨A common justification for LNG expansion is potential for emissions reductions through coal to gas switching in power sector.

Is this claim true? @LydiaYang21, @S_HastingsSimon & I explore.

Short answer: Yes & No. 1/
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
Near-term (<~2035)
LNG expansion aligned with Paris goals since there is more coal than LNG

Long-term (>2040)
a) Not compatible with 1.5/2°C goals: less coal globally to substitute with LNG
b) Compatible with business-as-usual 3°C trajectory as world still has lot of coal 2/
Caveats: Much of the LNG infrastructure is yet to be built.
1) Large-scale CCS can significantly extend utility of LNG infrastructure.
2) Low supply chain #methane leakage (<1%) critical to maximize benefits of LNG.3/
Read 8 tweets
Dec 9, 2021
🚨Preprint Alert🚨IT'S HERE!

For the first time, we use a large-scale controlled study of O&G #methane emissions to answer a basic question: How effective are commonly used Leak Detection & Repair (LDAR) programs?

There's a LOT we learnt here. Thread: 1/ eartharxiv.org/repository/vie…
EPA has proposed regulations to reduce #methane emissions from O&G sector. If global energy sector methane were a country, it would be the third largest emitter behind only China & US.

Key part of these regs are leak detection & repair (LDAR) programs. 2/ washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…
LDAR program are where O&G operators survey their facilities with IR cameras to find and fix leaks (see NYT article for videos).

But, we didn't really know if these LDAR programs are effective in reducing #methane, beyond anecdotal evidence. Until now! 3/ nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Read 15 tweets
Oct 26, 2021
I'm out here in WY near the Wind River Range to measure #methane emissions. As I write this, EPA is working on releasing updated methane regulations.

Let me tell you why this is not necessarily bad news. A thread on the complexity of #methane accounting: 1/
First, why is #methane fee a great idea? Recent data show that #methane emissions from operators vary by many orders of magnitude. So it makes sense that under a fee, responsible operators will be rewarded and those with high emissions will be penalized.
So, what's the issue with BBB proposal? Fee is entirely based on self-reporting to EPA GHGRP. 2 problems:

1) Emissions are underestimated in EPA report
2) Only facilities >25000 CO2e required to report

This sets up potential for fraud as it's easy to reduce emissions on paper.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 20, 2021
Good summary of what went wrong with the TX grid. I am going to try to explain what happened on the natural gas supply chain.

TL;DR: Combination of extended cold, unique basin properties, old pipes, and gas/electricity dependence. Thread. 1/
bloomberg.com/news/features/…
First, here's the natural gas supply chain. The parts that failed were in 3 areas:

1) oil & gas wells
2) Gathering lines
3) Equipment malfunction at power plants
4) Outage cut power to compressor stations that moved gas

+Other long-term issues like limited storage in TX. 2/
1) Why did O&G wells fail?

Permian basin is a liquids-rich basin. In addition to gas, wells also produce oil & water. For e.g., for every barrel of oil produced, you bring up 2-3 barrels of water.

In extended cold, water freezes and blocks the flow of gas from the well.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 11, 2020
Today's @Ben_Geman generate shows that #methane venting and flaring in TX and ND reached record highs in 2019.

This has serious implications for the lifecycle GHG emissions of natural gas power plants. US average leakage rate masks a lot of variation. 1/
axios.com/venting-flarin…
So, Alan Strayer - UG student in our lab, painstakingly traced gas flow from production basins to power plants to estimate state-specific leakage rates.

US avg. leak rate is ~2%, but states in the Midwest/SW have far higher leakage while states in NE/SE are lower. 2/ Image
Part of this is because of high venting/flaring as @Ben_Geman reports, in the Permian & Bakken basins, but also Canadian imports.

Looking at power plants by state, we see that states in MW/SW have higher emissions intensity than plants in the NE. 3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 13, 2020
Folks citing direct employment numbers in the gas industry in PA to suggest Biden is wrong on his "no fracking ban" policy don't get the ecosystem of people in these communities. It's not just a job - it's family, it's small businesses, & entire communities that will be affected.
I have been in these towns, I collect data in these towns, & it's not hard to see how entire community revolves around an industry.

It's not just a job, it's a way of life.

To suggest that it's only 10K jobs or votes is patronizing, elitist, reductive, and importantly, wrong.
I am one of the few in this country to engage with this issue intellectually while also forging a personal connection with these towns & workers.

And I have come to understanding their perspective, their hopes & challenges, and how we should really talk about energy transition.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(