- $850M to EPA for methane monitoring/mitigation
- Fee at $900/t in 2024 going up to $1500/t in 2026.
- EPA methane regs compliant facilities exempt if equivalence can be demonstrated
- EPA required to update inventory estimates in 2 years
The most important part is the requirement for EPA to update #methane inventory in 2 years, using data from direct measurements. This is critical to bridge gap between inventory & measurements. I will have more to say on this soon, but see our recent work: nature.com/articles/s4146…
We will likely see a race to lowest #methane emissions from operators. We were already going in that direction as demand for #certified gas increases globally. Large buyers don't like to pay more & will prefer low-emissions suppliers.
If O&G producers achieve #methane leakage shown here, #hydrogen produced using NG and CCS (blue #H2) will be eligible for production tax credits if life cycle emissions <4 kg CO2e/kg H2.
Near-term (<~2035)
LNG expansion aligned with Paris goals since there is more coal than LNG
Long-term (>2040)
a) Not compatible with 1.5/2°C goals: less coal globally to substitute with LNG
b) Compatible with business-as-usual 3°C trajectory as world still has lot of coal 2/
Caveats: Much of the LNG infrastructure is yet to be built. 1) Large-scale CCS can significantly extend utility of LNG infrastructure. 2) Low supply chain #methane leakage (<1%) critical to maximize benefits of LNG.3/
For the first time, we use a large-scale controlled study of O&G #methane emissions to answer a basic question: How effective are commonly used Leak Detection & Repair (LDAR) programs?
EPA has proposed regulations to reduce #methane emissions from O&G sector. If global energy sector methane were a country, it would be the third largest emitter behind only China & US.
LDAR program are where O&G operators survey their facilities with IR cameras to find and fix leaks (see NYT article for videos).
But, we didn't really know if these LDAR programs are effective in reducing #methane, beyond anecdotal evidence. Until now! 3/ nytimes.com/interactive/20…
First, why is #methane fee a great idea? Recent data show that #methane emissions from operators vary by many orders of magnitude. So it makes sense that under a fee, responsible operators will be rewarded and those with high emissions will be penalized.
Good summary of what went wrong with the TX grid. I am going to try to explain what happened on the natural gas supply chain.
TL;DR: Combination of extended cold, unique basin properties, old pipes, and gas/electricity dependence. Thread. 1/ bloomberg.com/news/features/…
First, here's the natural gas supply chain. The parts that failed were in 3 areas:
1) oil & gas wells 2) Gathering lines 3) Equipment malfunction at power plants 4) Outage cut power to compressor stations that moved gas
+Other long-term issues like limited storage in TX. 2/
1) Why did O&G wells fail?
Permian basin is a liquids-rich basin. In addition to gas, wells also produce oil & water. For e.g., for every barrel of oil produced, you bring up 2-3 barrels of water.
In extended cold, water freezes and blocks the flow of gas from the well.
Today's @Ben_Geman generate shows that #methane venting and flaring in TX and ND reached record highs in 2019.
This has serious implications for the lifecycle GHG emissions of natural gas power plants. US average leakage rate masks a lot of variation. 1/ axios.com/venting-flarin…
So, Alan Strayer - UG student in our lab, painstakingly traced gas flow from production basins to power plants to estimate state-specific leakage rates.
US avg. leak rate is ~2%, but states in the Midwest/SW have far higher leakage while states in NE/SE are lower. 2/
Part of this is because of high venting/flaring as @Ben_Geman reports, in the Permian & Bakken basins, but also Canadian imports.
Looking at power plants by state, we see that states in MW/SW have higher emissions intensity than plants in the NE. 3/
Folks citing direct employment numbers in the gas industry in PA to suggest Biden is wrong on his "no fracking ban" policy don't get the ecosystem of people in these communities. It's not just a job - it's family, it's small businesses, & entire communities that will be affected.
I have been in these towns, I collect data in these towns, & it's not hard to see how entire community revolves around an industry.
It's not just a job, it's a way of life.
To suggest that it's only 10K jobs or votes is patronizing, elitist, reductive, and importantly, wrong.
I am one of the few in this country to engage with this issue intellectually while also forging a personal connection with these towns & workers.
And I have come to understanding their perspective, their hopes & challenges, and how we should really talk about energy transition.