Number 99 Profile picture
Jul 28 13 tweets 4 min read
Babs says she will not reimplement mask mandate for #LosAngeles b/c of a tiny fraction of a downward shift in 10/100,000 hospitalization, blaming the CDC's metrics. But given how stressful this has been for Californians, this is nothing to be happy about, as below.

#FireFerrer
She would have gladly done this without huge public and media pushback plus legal threats.

This will only continue, as she makes clear, until someone replaces her.

We cannot remain vigilant forever so must reign her in once and for all now.
#UrgencyOfNormal #TeamReality

I will update more in a few minutes. Watching her ramble on right now.
Babs says cases started flattening last week. Fact check from her last video? She said cases were increasing then? Right?
Babs says she was talking to the State about BA.5 running it's course and says models are all over the place, so it's hard to know. But she advised masking (and is wearing one that looks like a black witch hat on her face).

Who was she speaking with?
Says "I'm not calling it a pause because we'll be moving shortly back to medium spread" and punts it to CDC metrics for high/low.

She says her framework doesn't actually reflect with/from hospitalizations, so that may be "an area we will be mindful about what the data tells us."
WSJ Q asks that she used two day later local data than CDC data to decide to not mask up LA?

@KelleyKga this is so you! Data gap (of 11.5/100,000 hospitalizations per week vs 10/100,000... that's some nightmare fuel)
She says she would consider a partial grocery store etc. mandate, but had to avoid being subject to legal actions, it's harder now than it used to be.

This was Janice Hahn's idea.
All schools will have tons of rapid tests, because of CAL/OSHA (in part -- don't ever overlook their idiotic role in this)
I can't barely her anymore. That stupid thing on her face looks terrifying.

She says if we see a big increase in cases or hospital admissions, which could happen a week from now, then she will reinstate masking, as based on CDC guidelines.
Big build up to this, how much did public pressure and two supervisors play into this decision (Thanks @MarlaTellez !)

Babs says many are in favor of universal indoor masking and their voices get buried. Says she focuses on data and this is based on that/CDC. Numbers don't lie.
Blah blah blah... #FireFerrer

@BillFOXLA notes she masks today, she says depends on whose in her office. Tech person. He notes Marla's Q was not answered: What % of her decision was based on community pressure?

"No specific %. We made our decision based on data." She is pissed!
Actually Q from @FoxPhil

I think her mask made her sound muffled.

Thanks Phil!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Number 99

Number 99 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MmeBlackBalloon

Jul 29
The reason why people are angry at public health having different attitudes towards monkeypox vs. COVID is because, however inelegantly expressed, people are outraged still that public health invasively decided if they could leave the house, go to work, go to school...
...this absolutely includes gay men, of course. Everyone was denied the most fundamental and basic rights -- and frankly still are, not only children, personally I am just as angry about all people having been subject to legal restrictions on movement and association for years...
...so when some people say things right now about "why can't public health say no to orgies?" (or whatever), they are lashing out at public health and not gay men, although imperfectly expressed. The point being made is simply that no one should be subject to any restrictions...
Read 9 tweets
Jul 23
One of the more interesting journal articles I've read recently (although from Dec 2020), from the Asian Journal of Psychiatry, discussing "coronaphobia" as a mental health disorder, essentially a phobia.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
This April 2022 article asserts coronaphobia high amongst nursing staff, at 80%, 36.7% feeling extreme fear.

As a non-Scientist who does not do much quantitative research (a few light stats only), cannot verify if it's a good study, just interesting.

journals.lww.com/jfmpc/fulltext…
My questions are:

1.) What is coronaphobia and how to best classify in relationship to other psychiatric disorders/ maladaptive responses? Anxiety, OCD, specific phobia, etc.?

2.) Next, how would it then make sense to treat it, especially if socially reinforced as as okay?
Read 9 tweets
Jul 22
School was asynchronous in parts of California too. Often just packets or Canvas/Blackboard. I thought it was more common than K-12 Zoom b/c it was considered an equity issue to require students to have strong WiFi/data in lower income homes.

Some kids were actually working.
They employ children in more rural California in agriculture, roadside fruit stands, food trucks and restaurant prep, farmer's markets, childcare, some home manufacturing, it all exploits child labor laws.

Remote asynchronous schooling was partially a door to child labor.
ACLU discussed it in Northern California (Marin County up) -- note the end of the 2020-21 school year is June 2021, and that schools did not all resume in person until August 2021, 17 months after schools shifted remotely.

Much more in the link.
aclunc.org/our-work/know-…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(