There's a school for autistic children who wants to name a classroom after me because according to the principal they've learned more from me over the years than from anyone else.
They want to use some of my artwork prints to decorate the classroom.
Other classrooms will also be themed and named after people.
I guess that this is like houses which we had at my own school, which were named after old men who played some forgotten role in the school history. Except this school is small, so it's classrooms, not houses.
Now... My instinct is to ask them to please not do this. I know this may sound cynical, but what if some kid hates school or hates that class teacher, or the whole school gets sold and turns awful, then my name is associated with their awful experience?
I know you could argue in the opposite direction too, like, what if they have a good experience?
But even that doesn't feel good to me. I think I just don't want anything named after me, except maybe a pet bird or something.
I don't even know whether I want my artwork on a classroom or walls. What if children don't like it, then they don't have a choice?
I understand that I have the right to say no (after all, the principal is ASKING me), but is my thinking wrong? I'm trying to use my name while I am alive to spread ideas and I want the ideas to live on in people, not my name.
Thank you for the input, @21stCeccentric, based on what you said, I asked the principal to rather democritise the name choice, so that the children can choose the name every year.
I will also send photos of my drawings so that the children can choose, and then have the principal's teenage artist daughter add colour.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So many American and Canadian parents of autistic children are being given no options but ABA. If they refuse direct ABA, people in charge slip the ABA methods into speech therapy, classroom practices or anywhere they can.
I'm seeing parents ask in Facebook groups how they...
...can get their children out of this, but they are being blocked all over. Even when officials agree not to use ABA, things happen that lead them to investigate what's going on, and you find out ABA-based approaches were used anyway, they just didn't call it that.
While all these people have this odd idea about 'evidence-based practice', they are unable to face the evidence playing out in front of them.
[THREAD] This thread is going to be about what it means for a therapy to be 'evidence-based', and in particular, what ABA therapists think 'evidence' is, how bizarre their ideas sometimes are, and how they can sometimes look straight at real evidence and not see it.
I need to talk about this diagram. Rather than add a lengthy image description, I'll just link to this and add more detail later in the thread as I explain the relevance of this pyramid: academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/textev…
I'm going to explain how the ABA research industry's refusal to respect disability rights has led to a paradoxical flipping of this pyramid, so that the evidence upon which they base their claims is of low quality.
[THREAD] It appears that most of the autism training given to teachers and autism professionals is based on a science fiction book from 1997...
...about an imaginary alien civilisation in decline, and the villains in power are trying to turn the inhabitants of some planet into robots because they don't know how to build robots, but some dying robot told them to do that,...
...otherwise the planet's infrastructure would assert itself like ivy and take over and no longer serve the alpha beings.
I want to tell you something that many people in the autism industry don't know:
Many well-known autistic activists in your local community and the international autism advocacy community ARE STILL BEING ABUSED BY THEIR PARENTS and they can't afford to tell the world.
Many.
Some of them lead or moderate support groups on Facebook.
Some of them arrange outings for autistic people and support communication rights for nonspeaking people.