2/ When Republicans put Amy Coney-Barret on the Supreme court the left chaged the meaning of "court-packing" and dictionary .com went along with it.
3/ Speaking of Amy Coney-Barret...
When Amy Coney-Barret used the term "preference" wbile discussing sexual orientation the left pretended that "preference" was offensive, and Merriam-Webster changed the definition in order to make that lie stick👇
4/ The transgender people got merriam-webster the change the definition of the word "female" to include "gender identity" (pic 1) when that was nowhere to found as recently as 2019 (pic 2)
5/ Of course changing the meaning of "female" means changing the meaning of "girl"
6/ And of course changing the meaning of '"girl" means changing the meaning of "boy"
7/ We also find that vox celebrating the fact that Merriam-Webster changed the definition of racism to include purely "systemic oppression."
8/ @chadfelixg points out that google changed the definition of the word bigot
9/ The left did not like us pointing out their use of "cultural marxism" (a term found in academic literature to refer to marxist cultural analysis) so they changed the meaning of that word to be an anti-semitic conspiracy theory... and wikipedia went along with it.👇
10/ The left did not lile non-white voting for Trump...so they changed the definition of "whiteness" to include black, brown, and hispanic people.
The dictionary didn't go along with this...but the washington post sure did.
11/ The game the left is playing is to shift the definitions of words in their favor, and then get dictionaries and wikipedia (the common sources people use to check definitions) to do their dirty work and change the official definition to reflect what the left wants.
12/ The left can't win on the merits so they have to play fast and loose with the definitions. They have to use linguistic sleight of hand to make it look like they're winning.
13/ @JackPosobiec points out that wikipedia has redefined the word "definition"
1/ Postmodern feminism seeks to attacking the self-confidence of men by subverting and calling into question the validity of everything that makes up men's sense of masculine identity and undercutting the social legitimacy of men pursuing their own goals and interests.
2/ Part of how this works is by embedding withing the culture a discourse that problematizes all the aspects of masculinity that define it, and which treats male priorities, goals, interests, and desires as ignorant, shameful, uncool, cringey, or low status.
3/ This is followed up by various forms of social pressure which are meant to induce a social and emotional vulnerability in men and make the only way to escape that vulnerability a course of action that advances the social, economic, and political goals/interests of feminists.
1/ This reminds me of a story about the influential Critical Theorist and Marxist Theodore Adorno.
Adorno had spent almost his entire career theorizing about how to tear down western capitalism and replace it with some form of Marxism, Communism, or socialism.
2/ Adorno had worked at the Frankfurt Institute and had worked closely with Hebert Marcuse, so his credentials as an academic Marxist committed to the overthrow of capitalism were second to none. He had also spent years training students to become Marxists activists.
3/ Adorno had prepared a set of lectures to be given at the Institute for Social Research (aka, The Frankfurt School) beginning April 22, 1969. when the first lecture began it was promptly interrupted by two groups of leftist radicals...
The left did not replace white Americans, they culturally replaced black Americans:
-BLM was replaced by Palestine
-Obama bros' were replaced by the Zorhan wing.
-Rap/hip hop was replaced by latin-fusion and afro-beats
-Black Church influence was replaced by Islamic influence
All the culture influence that black Americans used to exercise has been absorbed by various third world groups - mostly by Islamic, Middle-eastern, and various "global south" ethnic cultural influence (think Somalia).
Black Americans have been relegated to the back burner.
It's a chance for the Pro-American right to show that the left never actually cared about American blacks - it only ever saw them as a means to grab power - and as soon as third world/global south immigrant votes became available the left kicked black people to the curb.
1/ Almost all the feminist hot takes you see online are just women using feminist theory to create rage-bait for clicks.
This woman made content about how marriage is slavery and not wanting kids - now she's says she's getting married and that it's ok to do that if you want kids
2/ This particular woman has a podcast called "Maneater" which is basically full of anti-male and anti-marriage content and has 430K followers on tik tok. She is represented by Brillstein Entertainment Partners (a firm that represents both hollywood stars and influencers....
3/ With industry backing (which she has) a creator of her size can quite easily pull between $120,000/year or more. She is also clearly dating a man who is very wealthy, because he was able to buy her this $6000 Christian Dior handbag.
The left painted Christianity as a cringy, outdated, stuffy, religion of oppressors, so now leftist women looking for faith are picking the only religion they're allowed to like (Islam codes as brown so it can't be criticized), even though it makes the handmaids tale look tame.
Women on the left outnumber men on the left by a HUGE majority, and refuse to date right wing men. So a huge number of leftist women are therefore competing for a tiny number of leftist men. So Leftist women have almost no leverage when negotiating the terms of a relationship...
And because leftist women have adopted feminist liberation and consent morality, they have no morally consistent way to demand that men commit to them or settle down; as long as everything is consensual, leftist women have no moral grounds to demand men stop "dating around"...
2/ There is a difference between a recession and stagflation. A recession is just when an economy shrinks, and you usually get high unemployment and low productivity.
Recessions are bad, (no one likes unemployment) but they're nothing compared to the monster known as STAFLATION
3/ Stagflation is when you get a combinations of high inflation, high unemployment, stagnant growth, and lower productivity. And that combination of inflation, low productivity/growth and unemployment leaves the government with no good policy options for solving it because...