there’s a reason theyre currently trying to attack the credibility of johnny’s supporters, insinuating that we’re lying while trying to direct the attention to cocaine’s and kamilla’s threads. rather than directly acknowledging & debunking our “lies” as they so confidently claim.
#Distraction saying that deuters said johnny “cut himself” so it must mean that he did it himself. even though he quite literally stated “they didn’t know how” at first.
#Unsealed (but already known through previous declaration)
jennifer howell’s testimony about whitney saying that it was amber heard who had cut johnny’s finger off.
+
#Unsealed we already know that amber heard throws things, via her multiple statements in audios, and witnesses. it’s not unlikely that she threw a vodka bottle at him.
#Distraction “the audios and photos were manipulated”
the audios originated from amber heard. your girly is the one who had cut them. NGN gave those to johnny which were all he originally had.
also seems to me that many don’t realize that we’ve all heard the 4 hour audio that johnny submitted, it’s not new, yet they’re acting like it’s something “revealed.”
#Distraction photos. their device wasn’t imaged “a file’s last modified date refers to the date and time it was last saved.” we know that JD wasn’t the one who took the photos, they were sent to him.
I also HIGHLY doubt, as common sense entails, that he cut his finger twice.
#Unsealed also already known, amber heard produced multiple cut audios.
the fact that you guys take so much time on this, which we already know amber has done multiple times, just goes to show that you don’t have anything substantial to add.
#Unsealed confirmation of amber’s reaction to the prenup. and that she tried to leave the plane, as it was flying over the ocean.
#Unsealed amber heard initiating violence to keep him from going out with his friends, would insult and slap him to try to stop him. he’d constantly retreat. as we know. and her being proud of her violence.
as amber would berate him for leaving, here is him explaining why he would leave, because she got violent and he didn’t want to react.
amber heard fans try to say “it’s not EVERY time she’s violent so he’s being abusive because it’s stonewalling” need I say more?
#Unsealed dr. anderson had disapproved of amber’s TRO petition in LA because she said amber tried to change the rules.
interesting part of dr. anderson’s testimony where AH said if she’d have an advantage if she leaves him but files for abuse first.
fair enough to wonder about ig
kipper stated that he would have reported violence if he SAW it, he’s never seen him being violent with her. neither has nurse lloyd.
we know that drs restate what she reported to them. put two & two together. no one saw it, but AH said it
#Distraction just to show how they report what they don’t know. the daily beast said that depp’s legal team excluded the testimonies of a bunch of people
#Distraction he didnt attempt to. he didnt submit any exhibits related to it. & mentioned that in the case it comes to show a lack of injuries “the court should not resolve this issue in limine” bc they acknowledge that they wouldnt want to just show the damn nudes
#Unsealed amber sued him first via arbitration. because he stated he didn’t abuse her.
#Distraction these are the “threads” that kat, cocaine, and kamilla tell you so confidently about. this is johnny saying this. not amber. flat out lying.
.@barbiedripx posted more things that were revealed! including how amber heard requested to testify to her SA allegations on camera and, obviously, wanted JD's opposing evidence to be kept from the public/camera.
amber kept trying to have johnny have an IME even though he didn’t claim any psychological or physical injury in response to her op-ed. so there was no reason to for the IME, thats them saying that. in fact, it reveals the lengths she'll go to shame and harass.
4:10: when the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, the court may order a physical or mental exam
they were saying the requirements to show they dont apply. he didnt say he suffered psychological/physical injury due to her statements.
society: men get abused way less, so we dont talk about them as much
w a lot of men ive known, when i ask if theyve been abused, they say no. when i ask if theyve been hit, kicked, slapped, etc. unprovoked many say yes.
how can they recognize abuse if they were never taught to.
you know how '85% victims of DV are women' always gets thrown around? that's a key sign to tell if a 'domestic abuse expert' is biased. because that statistic comes from a crime victim survey, it's not commonly used, as it's inaccurate in reflecting victims of any gender.
but especially men, if they have a hard time seeing IPV as abuse, and then you go and frame IPV as a crime? widely underreported.
as a study found that phrasing questions about partner assaults in the context of criminal assaults reduced the reporting of partner assaults by 83%
read their thread. what theyre doing is damage control, & its obvious.
amber heard supporters are trying to make it seem as if the information theyre sharing is true & as if theyre combating that misinformation w threads & pointing fingers at tiktok, this is why 🧵🪡🧵🧶🧵🧶🧶
they have the MSM media on their side, they try & frame it as a good thing, trying to increase their credibility, the MSM is known to use tactics to spread misinformation. it focuses on appealing to people’s emotions in order to keep them from thinking logically & critically
the headlines that so many articles use and put as the central topic involve instilling fear in others, telling survivors of IPV that they won’t be believed because of the johnny and amber trial, that no amount of evidence is enough, that it’s a gag order on women,
“they began making threads in support of AH, giving the impression that theyre sharing full and factual evidence, but in reality manipulating the evidence presented and remaining completely biased”
“the threads JD supporters supporters make are combating that misinformation
“openly showing both sides of the discussion, AH supporters fail to mention any evidence we show. The little they do mention to try and “debunk” JD supporters are incidents that they rarely ever mention when they talk about her being abusive, you can make a whole thread-
amber heard ppls move rn is shifting the attention to texts rather than the actual focus: the relationship between amber & johnny depp in relation to abuse, where docs showed her (again) admitting multiple times that she was the perpetrator of violence.
you’ll show that she isolated him from his friends by initiating violence and they’ll divert the attention till you’re suddenly left arguing about whether or not johnny depp doctored a photo of his finger injury since apparently it’s probable to have your finger cut twice
they never directly respond to the evidence, they have to put the attention somewhere else.
to talk about everything else, you have to get to the center of the dynamics first. who’s been shown multiple times to be the perpetrator w evidence. amber, physically violent unprovoked
thread in response to k4mil1aa’s thread about johnny depp and amber heard because it’s completely misleading and fails to recognize research on this exact topic, despite trying to frame it as informative.
this study analyzed women’s shelters or participants who said they were abused, which is not representative of community samples. so yes, when a woman is being abused, self-defense may not be uncommon, but that’s not what we’re talking about,
because the subject at hand is talking about a man being a victim, not to mention that when a man is a victim people commonly excuse the woman’s violence by saying it was self-defense, which contradicts studies showing the opposite.