Repositioning the global supply chains away from China is already becoming a reality following the COVID-19, and the Indo-Pacific region is about to become a forefront of this geoeconomic reconfiguration, due to the withdrawal of American & international capital from Beijing. 1/
Major geoeconomic opportunities and challenges will appear following the diversification of the global supply chains. A global disruption of supply chains is coupled with the imperilled rules-based global order caused by eroding international structures. 2/
The reconfiguration will be initiated by the US to bring manufacturing and supply chains back home or to branch out to American allies and partners from the Anglosphere of influence such as UK, Australia, Japan, and increasingly India. 3/
Moving production from traditional hubs to new ones will take time and will require trust building, but will also create new geoeconomic advantages. Regional centres of trade power, such as Japan & EU, already began considering a shift of manufacturing operations out of China. 4/
Sectors such as space technologies, AI, defence, & cyber can expect strategic investments to promote the growth of new, regional power centres. This is important since any significant breakthrough in these areas will bestow global competitiveness and geoeconomic advantages. 5/
Further, the unprecedented interconnectedness of all socio-economic systems and their networks has obfuscated the distinction between economic and trade indicators, on one hand, and defence and security considerations on the other. 6/
This explains why the competition between the US and China does not solely represent a trade war, but a broader rivalry extending to the global networks of finance, trade, economy, diplomacy, energy, defence and so forth. 7/
The Indo-Pacific region will become a major battlefield for any progress regarding the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the upcoming decade. Over the long term, there is a likely scenario of two parallel supply chains networks, one set up by US, the other with access to China. 8/
The Chips and Science Act includes more than $52 billion for US companies producing computer chips & billions more in tax credits to encourage investment in chip manufacturing, & will be signed into law. It's happening in the geopolitical context of global supply reconfiguration.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gazprom's announcement that it cannot guarantee gas supplies due to "extraordinary" circumstances must be seen in the context of ongoing war against 🇺🇦.
🇷🇺 is intensifying attacks "in all operational sectors" of the war, signaling that it’s working toward unilateral ceasefire.1/
This move will help 🇷🇺 consolidate its territorial gains in eastern & southern 🇺🇦, replenish its troops, & freeze military operations until the next phase of the war. In the meantime, Russia is intensifying its commodities war vs Europe by freezing gas supplies through NS1. 2/
This move has a double meaning in the current context. It must be seen as a harbinger of a total gas embargo ahead of the winter season, as European storage capacities are not filled to the required extent, 3/
Not all realists share #Mearsheimer views on Russia's war against Ukraine. I am positioned in the #realpolitik corner while using #geopolitics and #geoeconomics as the main pillars of #foresight.This is my assessment since Dec 2021 (see pinned tweet) on Russia's plan.
Thread🧵👇
There won't be any peace negotiations no matter how often Germany & France (small-size countries in Europe have no geopolitical weight) call Putin. Once Russia establishes control over Donbas & reaches its war goals in the this phase, Moscow will unilaterally declare ceasefire.
Preventing Russia from winning in this critical phase of the war requires the heavy weapons deliveries to Ukraine to sustain the Russian attacks. If Ukraine has to give up on territories in Donbas for the sake of Western appeasement, this won't stop the war. On the opposite.
No significant player has any big interest in a prolonged crisis in Kazakhstan right now. Russia will keep „peacekeepers“ on the ground but will make sure to complete the CSTO operation asap. China is getting ready for the Olympics. Turkey tackles a serious currently crisis. ⤵️
US is preparing for the talks with Moscow regarding Ukraine & has no military footprint in Central Asia following the exit from Afghanistan. The EU is irrelevant geopolitical player in Central Asia despite major geoeconomic interests in Kazakhstan. The crisis will be over soon.⤵️
Depending on Russia‘s military performance to stabilize the situation on the ground without antagonizing civilians, Moscow will upgrade its regional position against both the US & China amid Bifurcation of the Global System and an escalation in Eastern Europe. See my pinned 🧵 ⤵️
The danger of a military attack by Russia in the direct European neighborhood is permanent and the most recent escalation caused by its drastic troops mobilization will send a strong signal once again that a military attack could be imminent at any time. What’s Russia’s plan? /1
Russia‘s Putin is preparing for the „long game“, that is the systemic rivalry between USA and China. He seeks to upgrade his regional positioning by testing the American reaction (he knows that there won’t be a military involvement by US in Ukraine due to mid-term elections). /2
And at the same time, by showing muscle, Putin makes Russia an indispensable player, without which neither of the two rivals - USA & China, could win the future competition against each other. How many countries in the world could mobilize so many troops in such a short time? /3
The greatest risk for Europe, in addition to the increasing political, economic, and social destabilisation of the continent, is the emergence of lines of fragmentation along competing geopolitical interests of the external actors. /1
The divergent
goals of key actors (US, China, Russia, Turkey, etc.) further divide European members & institutions on geopolitical issues. As a result, the 🇪🇺 has less & less room for manoeuvres in increasingly contested areas in its immediate neighbourhood to the South & East./2
Other regional actors not only have combat experience but also do not shy away from the use of force. The geopolitical gaps that are opening up in the Middle East, North Africa & Eastern Europe will be filled by these agile regional actors, further exacerbating the EU’s stance./3
An unexpected manifestation of the pandemic is the bifurcation of the global order in a way unseen since the Cold War. It begs the question—is the world witnessing the beginning of a new bipolar era of global competition? A thread 🧵#GlobalSystem#geopolitics#RaisinaFiles
In the presence of a hegemon, there is always a process of polarisation that leads to the creation of a secondary system organised around a pole consisting of a single competitor or a group of rivals that seek to undermine the incumbent’s global power supremacy.
A global reserve currency is not possible nowadays without global power projection capabilities
that enable the US to control the interconnected flows of goods, capital, services, data, & protect trade & transport routes from disruptions that might result in major supply shocks.