3/ This argument - that @jeremycorbyn is somehow a threat - is repeated in this article by Juliet Samuel, which also references the security services planted story containing the Czech spy allegations: telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/…
4/ The main author of the Telegraph's puff piece article is none other than vehement anti-Corbyn journalist Juliet Samuel #dontpayuk 12ft.io/proxy?ref=&q=h…
5/ The article makes a big deal about the notion that #dontpayuk activists are "socialists". Of course this cannot be verified because they, of course, continue to be anonymised (while urging others to take actions that may put themselves at risk).
6/ In any case, what manner of socialists would speak to a journalist who conisiders Jeremy Corbyn a threat to the UK and who has endorsed this narrative when writing for a paper that has previously printed hit piece articles planted by the security services? #dontpayuk
7/ More on Juliet Samuel. Not only is she a Telegraph contributor, she's also associated with the Policy Exchange think tank, which promotes neoliberal domestic and foreign policy. #dontpayuk
10/ I do wonder what he would make of the supposed socialists now associating themselves with anti-Corbyn contributors to this extremely right wing neoliberal think-tank. In any case, the #dontpayuk questions remain:
11/ Who are the "socialists" behind #dontpayuk?
How did they get contacts in the mainstream media?
Why was the Corbyn-hostile telegraph so willing to promote the views of supposed "socialists", to whom it is inveterately hostile?
12/12 For my own part, I can't & won't support an campaign with such connections, especially as I have no idea who is behind it. Hopefully this is the last I will write about #dontpayuk. I didn't intend to get into it until the defensiveness of its supporters piqued my curiosity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ There's so much ignorance in this position. For one thing, the West isn't sending weapons to Ukraine "in isolation". It is applying incredibly severe sanctions to Russia, which not only aren't working but are rebounding on the west, damaging its economies.
2/ The more fundamental point is that Ukraine was never going to win against Russia because Russia regards the of Ukrainian NATO membership as an EXISTENTIAL THREAT to its security. That means there is no limit to the efforts it will go to in order to prevent Ukraine joining.
3/ Russia is therefore willing to fully mobilise its population and economy in order to win the war if necessary. There is no scenario in which Ukraine wins. Western supplies of weapons and sanctions have just escalated the conflict, making it more costly for Russia.
1/. @jeremycorbyn's recent comments regarding #Ukraine confirm that he is still a threat to establishment interests. He is always at his best when speaking plainly and freely about international issues...
2/ I wrote some of my recent pieces to highlight that establishment interests aren't only represented by the Tories & right wing Labour but also some who consider themselves allies of Corbyn: The imperialist tendencies within the Labour left...
3/ Which I suspect are already manouvring to "contain" any future Corbyn initiatives on internationalism in particular. I don't have any knowledge of how these moves might be unfolding now, but I suspect it resembles how they have operated in the past. Case in point: Momentum.
1/ I have finally gotten around to flicking through @DerbyChrisW's book 10 Years Hard Labour. lolabooks.eu › products
Ten Years Hard Labour | Chris Williamson | Lola Books. I haven't had the chance to read it in full, so I am just going to give at a glance impressions
2/ It seems to be very good. Given how shabbily he was treated by the Labour Party, it might be expected that the clarity of Williamson's analysis would be obstructed by (justified) personal grievance. His analysis is clear and well argued.
3/ His explanation of what went wrong and what lessons are to be learned from the weaponisation of antisemitism allegations is hard to argue with (to a large extent it supports my own view though coming from a very different experience).