I’m not sure ‘people alive and healthy’ could be bettered as a mission statement for a society. Look at this excess deaths graph (thanks @KarenCutter4) and try to isolate what it was we stopped doing in 2020/21, that we started doing again in 2022. /1 #auspol#covid19aus
My hunch is the dominant answer would be ‘we stopped functioning as an economy and this surge of good health was unsustainable, funded by government debt’. Unfortunately facts get in the way of that good story. Yes a big dip right at the start of the pandemic, but growth then…/2
…easily surpassing what we had *before* the pandemic. And this during two years of what idiots call our ‘lockdown’, when the economy was apparently under mortal threat. Remember this schematic, all that white space where we weren’t ’locked down’? Lockdowns were only needed…/3
…in that late-2021 stage when NSW and National Cabinet began lifting protections mid-pandemic. (The initial national lockdown was so effective it created all that white space afterwards.) Not only were people the healthiest they’d ever been, our ‘economy’ was smashing out…/4
…GDP in a way we could only have dreamed of pre-pandemic. So what happened in 2020-21 that we should bottle, rinse and repeat? We redistributed wealth. Out of the rarefied air of the top 1% of society, and back into the hands of ordinary working people. /5
It made society as a whole *drum roll* healthier and wealthier. After decades of siphoning off public investment to hand over to lobbyists, forcing those same ordinary people to take on astronomical personal debt to keep society running, suddenly the Treasury was used…/6
…to fund ordinary people. And look at the results. You can buy the propaganda that ‘opening up’ to Covid from late-2021 was about rescuing the economy. The economy was doing great, we weren’t ‘locked down’. It was about stemming the flow of public funds, to the public. /7
All politics is always about this. The battle between working people and the people who employ them. Right now the employers are back in charge, and we’re all crammed into infection-infested workplaces on our pathetic, stagnant wages. When they and their political reps say:…/8
…’we can’t go back to lockdowns’, remember:
1) we weren’t locked down, for most of 2020-21, and 2) the ‘we’ they mean is themselves. Not us, who did very well out of public health action, thank you.
I see many confused that the obvious disaster of ‘live with the virus’…/9
…still manages to win the day, despite all the evidence it’s not working. But for the people who introduced it, it is working. This was always about restoring who’s in charge. About who gets the keys to the Treasury. Workers have never been allowed to have those. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Political libertarianism has quite a foothold in Australia. Thanks to @ColinKinner for the tip-off on this one.
This set of ideas is toxic to civilisation itself. And also laughably illogical and self-contradictory. These ideas must be opposed. /1
Libertarianism creates a binary between individual and collective action that simply doesn’t exist.
Those aren’t two separate things. It’s only by acting collectively, that we have individual freedom. /2
In everything we do *individually*, we’re acting collectively, at the same time. Even the language we use is a collective tool, that we shape individually.
People who oppose individual freedom and collective action are usually aiming to just replace existing hierarchies. /3
My great friend @DavidJoffe64 taught me about dysautonomia. When your body’s automatic functions suddenly go haywire, as he sees sometimes in Long Covid.
There’s a social correlate of dysautonomia. Populism is social dysautonomia. /1
Your autonomic nervous system regulates things like your blood pressure, breathing, heart rate, digestion and sexual function.
These are things you absolutely need to be running automatically, without your help. /2
Imagine having to manually control all of those things yourself. You’d be dead in minutes.
Over millions of years your body developed an automatic system to deal with all of this for you. /3
Here’s what in my view is most widely misunderstood about social media, and why it’s so dangerous. And yes, I’m still on it. You can criticise unsafe driving, while still driving.
And this is what’s at stake in the governments v platform battles. /1
Social media is dangerous because of one key thing. It pretends that the mythology of societies being ‘the people’ is true.
It links everybody together so that their interaction can supposedly lead to an emergent collective society. /2
But as the POW camps in the Korean war showed so brutally and clearly, that’s not how human groups operate.
Ever. They are ALWAYS led, by about 5% of any group. /3