I’m not sure ‘people alive and healthy’ could be bettered as a mission statement for a society. Look at this excess deaths graph (thanks @KarenCutter4) and try to isolate what it was we stopped doing in 2020/21, that we started doing again in 2022. /1 #auspol#covid19aus
My hunch is the dominant answer would be ‘we stopped functioning as an economy and this surge of good health was unsustainable, funded by government debt’. Unfortunately facts get in the way of that good story. Yes a big dip right at the start of the pandemic, but growth then…/2
…easily surpassing what we had *before* the pandemic. And this during two years of what idiots call our ‘lockdown’, when the economy was apparently under mortal threat. Remember this schematic, all that white space where we weren’t ’locked down’? Lockdowns were only needed…/3
…in that late-2021 stage when NSW and National Cabinet began lifting protections mid-pandemic. (The initial national lockdown was so effective it created all that white space afterwards.) Not only were people the healthiest they’d ever been, our ‘economy’ was smashing out…/4
…GDP in a way we could only have dreamed of pre-pandemic. So what happened in 2020-21 that we should bottle, rinse and repeat? We redistributed wealth. Out of the rarefied air of the top 1% of society, and back into the hands of ordinary working people. /5
It made society as a whole *drum roll* healthier and wealthier. After decades of siphoning off public investment to hand over to lobbyists, forcing those same ordinary people to take on astronomical personal debt to keep society running, suddenly the Treasury was used…/6
…to fund ordinary people. And look at the results. You can buy the propaganda that ‘opening up’ to Covid from late-2021 was about rescuing the economy. The economy was doing great, we weren’t ‘locked down’. It was about stemming the flow of public funds, to the public. /7
All politics is always about this. The battle between working people and the people who employ them. Right now the employers are back in charge, and we’re all crammed into infection-infested workplaces on our pathetic, stagnant wages. When they and their political reps say:…/8
…’we can’t go back to lockdowns’, remember:
1) we weren’t locked down, for most of 2020-21, and 2) the ‘we’ they mean is themselves. Not us, who did very well out of public health action, thank you.
I see many confused that the obvious disaster of ‘live with the virus’…/9
…still manages to win the day, despite all the evidence it’s not working. But for the people who introduced it, it is working. This was always about restoring who’s in charge. About who gets the keys to the Treasury. Workers have never been allowed to have those. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I often Tweet about the 1970s being a pivotal time in the reversing of the public gains of the we-based society, post-WW2. The period 1950-late-1970s, when ‘the public’ was the dominating principle of governance. Rebuilding broken societies.
Housing no exception.
1/5
Look at how mass home ownership only emerged with massive government-led public housing programs, post-war. And how that ownership rate flatlined and then declined with the progressive removal of public housing programs, replaced by ‘the market’.
2/5
Really just a smokescreen for the resurgence of status as the dominating principle in housing. Look at that price curve, accompanying the flatlined rate of ownership.
The same pattern of reversal of the public good as an organising principle can be found everywhere.
This topic attracts so much interest because of the framing, lost in the noise. The framing that says human-human interaction is ‘natural’ and ‘real’, and human-machine interaction is ‘algorithmic’ and ‘fake’.
That framing falls apart with even small scrutiny.
/2
I’ve spent years here describing how much if not most human activity is actually social. It’s about people negotiating their status, in groups, against other groups.
This should ring all sorts of alarm bells about the idea of ‘natural’ human interaction.
/3
I’ve watched sport over many years, as a window into a culture we’re still not seeing or understanding.
Victory now creates utter euphoria. Defeat has professionals in tears, with crowds either silent or overwhelmed with euphoria themselves.
A culture in plain sight.
/1
Team sports culture. Kidult culture, the now entrenched imitative rivalry of competing groups or teams, not just in sport, but in every part of life.
The culture of the schoolyard. Status battles, for identity.
/2
Long gone are the days where both winner and loser shook hands politely, both smiling, celebrating a ‘good game’. Where crowds applauded both competitors.
Everything, in sport and outside it, is now resolutely ‘partisan’.
/3
Staff member turned up to work sick yesterday. It was an insight into ‘living with’ infection culture.
I told them to go home. ‘No, I’m fine, I have too much to do.’
Then others in the office approached me in private to ask me to make them go home.
/1
These others are the same people who most embrace the ‘living with’ infection culture that started during Covid.
In front of others they boast and bluster about how ‘you have to live your life’, and mock people in masks etc.
/2
It’s a show. The fear at catching Covid in particular is there under the surface. They’ve had several years now of being pummelled by infections of various kinds.
One who asked me in private to make the sick staff member go home was desperate, they have no more sick leave.
/3