Developing a comprehensive search strategy is crucial when conducting a systematic review but can be a difficult and time-consuming process. Using visual aids can be of great assistance when formulating your search strategy.
Creating a Concept Map helps to develop a comprehensive search strategy and provides you with a visual image of your research topic.
A concept map contains a main topic idea in the centre of the map with other aspects of your topic surrounding it (keywords), alternative terminology (keywords) to describe your topic for each keyword & illustrates relationships of the various aspects of your topic to each other.
Another visual aid that will assist in developing your search strategy is a Logic Grid. In a logic grid, each column represents a discrete concept that is generally aligned with each element of the relevant framework (e.g. PICO).
Placing terms into a logic grid illustrates how the related concepts or synonyms will combine to construct the final search string. It is important to note however that the inclusion of outcomes in a logic grid is generally not recommended as it can make the search too specific.
Learn more tips and strategies you can use when searching for studies for your systematic review. Register for the JBI Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program jbi.global/education/syst…. The next CSRTP is held on 24 October 2022.
🧵Globally, migrant nurses and midwives make up a significant proportion of healthcare workers, and trends indicate an exponential rise in #nurse & #midwife migration globally. #JBIEBHC 1/8
The @WHO healthcare workforce report predicts a shortfall of ~ 6 million nurses by 2030 2/8
Many countries rely on nurse and midwife migration to manage their shortfall of healthcare professionals 3/8
🧵In hospitals, paediatric patients aged 1-3 are at higher risk of falls, with most falls occurring from an inpatient bed in the presence of a caregiver #JBIEBHC 1/6
JBI Evidence Summaries bring together world-class evidence in a single, easy to read summary crafted by review experts and are found in the JBI #EBP Database wolterskluwer.com/en/know/jbi-re… @ovid_wkhealth
3/6
On #IND2022 we reflect on JBI’s origins as the ‘Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing’ and the continuing importance, 25 years on, of evidence-based nursing research and clinical practice #JBIEBHC 🧵 1/7
Quality healthcare services require that clinical decision-making in #nursing is based on evidence, particularly in standardising and aligning healthcare practices with evidence at the point of care. JBI was founded by Emeritus Professor Alan Pearson to address this very need 2/7
‘When I was involved in setting up JBI in the 1990s, #EBM was increasingly adopted across the world, but #EBN was in its infancy. Since then, JBI has played a stellar role in developing great models and systems to support the implementation of evidence into nursing practice' 3/7
Read this Tweetorial on relative ranks for methodological quality assessment by Jennifer Stone, Research Fellow in the JBI #EBHC Research Division, for #JBImethodology month 1/7
Did you know that there’s an alternative bias assessment method for primary studies in meta-analyses and systematic reviews that does not require reviewer judgments? 2/7
This approach uses relative ranks that are based on quality counts.
#Qualitative evidence synthesis seeks to provide an understanding of meanings, practices and processes associated with social experience, behaviour and culture 2/10
Qualitative evidence synthesis involves the identification and synthesis of qualitative studies to provide insights related to a focused question 3/10
A/Prof Edoardo Aromataris gives key points on umbrella reviews in this tweetorial. #JBImethodology
With the ever-increasing number of systematic reviews and research syntheses available to inform topics in healthcare, SRs of existing reviews, or #umbrellareviews, are increasingly being conducted to summarise a broad scope of issues related to a given topic.
An umbrella review is also ideal in highlighting if the evidence base around a topic or question is consistent or if contradictory or discrepant findings exist, and in exploring and detailing the reasons why.