The #BanABA movement needs a few volunteers for an occasional electronic task. You can opt out at any time. 1/
If you're interested in possibly helping out, please reply below by linking to one of your tweets from July 2022 or earlier where you have used the #BanABA or #StopTheShock hashtag. You'll need to follow me too, so I can add you to our Twitter working group for this. 2/
We don't need many people; two or three will do; but with more volunteers, we know we can possibly count on you in future.
3/
If you don't like the task once I have explained it, no problem, you can just say, this is not for me, and opt out.
4/
It's important that we get started ASAP. This is time-sensitive.
Remember, you can opt out whenever you want.
5/
Thank you to all who responded! We have enough of a team now, so I am closing off responses, but may reopen again if we need to expand into other activities. Grateful for the help!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[THREAD] Many autists think that to stop camouflaging (i.e. to stop trying to pass as 'normal') is about normalising stimming and gaze aversion, about asserting the need for sensory accommodations, and allowing oneself the freedom to talk at length about favourite topics.
We may also think it's all about recognising that we've been gaslit about the empathy thing, and becoming mindful of our hyperempathy.
But unmasking all this is just taking off the top layer.
There's more, and most of us don't talk about that part.
So many American and Canadian parents of autistic children are being given no options but ABA. If they refuse direct ABA, people in charge slip the ABA methods into speech therapy, classroom practices or anywhere they can.
I'm seeing parents ask in Facebook groups how they...
...can get their children out of this, but they are being blocked all over. Even when officials agree not to use ABA, things happen that lead them to investigate what's going on, and you find out ABA-based approaches were used anyway, they just didn't call it that.
While all these people have this odd idea about 'evidence-based practice', they are unable to face the evidence playing out in front of them.
[THREAD] This thread is going to be about what it means for a therapy to be 'evidence-based', and in particular, what ABA therapists think 'evidence' is, how bizarre their ideas sometimes are, and how they can sometimes look straight at real evidence and not see it.
I need to talk about this diagram. Rather than add a lengthy image description, I'll just link to this and add more detail later in the thread as I explain the relevance of this pyramid: academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/textev…
I'm going to explain how the ABA research industry's refusal to respect disability rights has led to a paradoxical flipping of this pyramid, so that the evidence upon which they base their claims is of low quality.