Work by @TinyMuslimah on #BlackLivesMatter is crucial, e.g. Prayer, protest & police brutality: Black Muslim spiritual resistance in the Ferguson era. And look out for @ErinBimmons' work on UK anti-austerity movements & their resistance to metrics coming out of her @NSSRNews PhD.
But the greatest joy of the week was ofc the nightly karaoke sessions ;)
Please do add any additional resource suggestions that should be included in this econ-anthro thread (I haven't even looked at my notes from the week yet, but know a giant to-read list will emerge from them!!).
Interesting to see that a lot of problems we have in econ are mirrored in anthro: deep structural hierarchies, colonial research, highly problematic research ethics. The big difference is the radical anthros resisting this are still to be found in top anthro institutions.
And here are some insights into what anthros can take away from econ (we were mostly heterodox at the Symposium altho we didn't all agree on using the term), summarised by @JElyachar 👇
Am really hoping for more interdisciplinary exchanges like this!
This project also inspired us to embark on this transdisciplinary paper with @mariadyveke on how we need structural & relational analyses to understand unequal global financial development (thanks also @paulrgilbert for initial feedback). Look forward to taking it to @ReviewofPE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We engage with 2 main camps in the financialisation lit: 1) largely descriptive studies of how financial institutions, actors, motives & practices have expanded in recent decades (e.g. Krippner, Epstein), focusing on quantitative changes.
We call it the 'expansion' view.
2) More qualitative studies of how finance has come to dominate other realms of the economy, which often see the productive marriage between finance and production as in severe crisis, as the golden age of capitalism has come to an end. We call it the 'divorce' view.
What happens when 7 scholars from different heterodox traditions, including Marxism, Post-Keynesianism & Dependency Theory, get together to work on finance?
It actually did not descend into total chaos 🤯
Check out our research agenda on international financial subordination 😊
We identify how different heterodox & disciplinary traditions bring different strengths to the table for conceptualising how developing economies remain in a subordinate position in the global monetary and financial system, and how this shapes the ways in which finance operates.
We argue that an agenda on international financial subordination (IFS) would benefit from a sustained engagement with heterodox traditions that have been the most explicit and systematic in their analysis of finance in the periphery: Marxist, PK & dependency theory scholarship.
Samir Amin critiqued cultural views of Orientalism and proposed alternative, structural analyses of imperialism, Eurocentrism, uneven development and ideology.
What can contemporary development economics and quests for decolonization learn from this? aeon.co/essays/if-you-…
In this piece I try to make Samir Amin's ideas more accessible to a wider contemporary audience (thanks @samhaselby for the push!).
Many already know Edward Said, who became very influential with his 1978 Orientalism. I therefore start with Amin's critique of Said from the Left.
With his ‘Eurocentrism’ (1988), Amin offers an alternative materialist understanding of how capitalism and imperialism have shaped global colonial inequalities and ideologies, which contrasts with Said's understanding based on discourse.
I had the pleasure of chairing the panel on Heterodox Economics Globally with inspiring talks captured here by @nssylla and @Drsaalajeng (but unfortunately the beginning of Rama's got lost!).
Why Do Economists Have Trouble Understanding Racialized Inequalities?
Based on survey data, @SurbhiKesar and I make some observations regarding the Economics discipline and its lack of capacity to deal with race... + ineteconomics.org/perspectives/b…
We find that economists in mainstream Econ depts are the least likely to teach about racial inequalities & colonialism (see figure). We believe the reason for this is the inadequate manner in which mainstream Econ theorises inequality, and race in particular. +
We argue: "...the discipline falls markedly short of recognizing the structural, historical factors that are central for producing and perpetuating inequality across groups, both in terms of opportunities and outcomes." +
#AHE2020 as seen from rural Norway. @SurbhiKesar (@working_india) introducing the panel on perspectives from the Global South on Heterodox Economics with a stellar panel calling in from India, Italy and the US.
Prabhat Patnaik opens the plenary, speaking on globalization, inequality and economic crisis. #ahe2020
Now @LuGuangMing is presenting on "Bordering the Surplus Population across the Mediterranean: Imperialism and Unfree Labour in Libya and the Italian Countryside". She explains how immigrant workers can be seen as a reserve army allowing farmers to meet low production costs.