This week people were angered to find that massive polluter @WoodsideEnergy is sponsoring parliament's midwinter ball.
It's just one tactic in Woodside's industrial scale 'reputation washing' strategy to enable it to keep on polluting. Thread…
🧵 #auspol tinyurl.com/yywm7xsz
Woodside’s problem is that it makes profit by mining and selling oil and gas - fossil fuels that are driving the climate emergency.
Indeed Woodside is now one of the ten biggest oil and gas majors in the world - and the only one based in Australia: marketindex.com.au/news/a-merged-…
In Australia, Woodside is best known as a gas producer.
As @adamlmorton noted this week in a helpful explainer piece, “gas is a central driver of the climate emergency”: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
The devastating impacts of gas on climate, nature and humanity is why the International Energy Agency has called for a total moratorium on opening any new coal, oil or gas projects to avoid climate disaster: iea.org/reports/net-ze…
However, Woodside is ignoring the International Energy Agency - and the findings and pleas of about a gazillion climate scientists - by wanting to lock in fossil gas pollution for decades to come, including opening up massive new offshore gas mines: woodside.com/what-we-do/gro…
According to researchers at Climate Analytics, Woodside’s expansion plans are ‘not 1.5°C consistent’ and ‘represents a bet against the world implementing the Paris Agreement’: theguardian.com/environment/20…
Another way of putting this, is that Woodside’s entire business strategy is betting on the acceleration of what 11,000 scientists described earlier this year as “untold suffering due to the climate crisis”: theguardian.com/environment/20…
So how does Woodside plan to get away with a business based on driving conditions leading to untold human suffering?
They have a bunch of strategies.
In this thread I will concentrate on ‘reputation washing’.
Some others are set out here in @arenatweets: arena.org.au/gaslit-futures…
As Tim Winton said in a fantastic truth telling speech earlier this year, huge polluting fossil fuel corporations like Woodside now rely on ‘trafficking in cognitive distortion’. Reputation washing is a big part of this: thesaturdaypaper.com.au/opinion/topic/…
Woodside doesn't want us to think of them as threatening the future of life on earth.
The Woodside corporate vision is to be ‘society's trusted energy partner’.
As any swindler knows, there are plenty of ways to win trust.
Let’s dig into this… woodside.com.au/who-we-are/pur…
Publicly listed companies will only do things that cost money when there is a business case.
When Woodside says it ‘has an active role to play in contributing to the well-being of our communities’, it is because it can see business advantage in doing so: tinyurl.com/37z6vxhh.
‘Reputation washing’ describes the use of positive activities to distract from or legitimise negative operations or strategies.
Woodside gains business advantage - keeping social licence to keep pumping out deadly pollution - through large-scale, multi-layered reputation washing.
In exchange for sponsorship dollars, the @WoodsideEnergy brand and accompanying propaganda is smeared over all sorts of institutions, places and people.
The Woodside logo even turns up on the bodies of some of our children… nipperswa.com.au/what-is-woodsi…
Now let’s check out some more examples of Woodside engaging in 'reputation washing' in education, sport, the arts and the wider community.
In WA in particular, they are everywhere - but the tentacles extend wide across Australia.
Perth has two AFL teams. At one of them, the @freodockers, the players have taken a strong public stand for climate action - but the club jumper carries the Woodside logo as major sponsor: fremantlefc.com.au/news/1023050/f…
Woodside is deep into schools.
Health professor Charles Watson has described this infiltration of the education system as a campaign to convince the community "that oil and gas aren't really anything to worry about”.
Shameful. abc.net.au/news/2021-08-2…
Woodside is especially deep into @uwanews.
This one really hurts, because I am a UWA grad and I love the place.
But “UWA” now risks being known as the “University for Woodside’s Advantage”.
This a gross betrayal of the public purpose of universities: theguardian.com/australia-news…
It is not just West Australian universities that have the Woodside logo smeared all over them. @MonashUni has gave naming rights to Woodside over a new building, accompanied by an unsubtle greenwashing video... monash.edu/it/woodside-bu…
Woodside aims to be seen as caring about humanity’s future - instead of wrecking it.
So the company sponsors a ‘Future Lab Network’ with the ostensible aim to ‘accelerate growth for better ways of working, a better workplace, and a better world’: woodside.com.au/what-we-do/inn…
The ‘Woodside Development Fund’ claims to be animated by ‘one global vision: every child thrives in their development, learning and life’.
This, from a massive corporate driver of climate pollution, which threatens the future of every child on earth... woodside.com.au/sustainability…
And while we are doing breath-taking cynicism, let's remember that earlier this year Woodside sponsored an orchestral event entitled ‘Become Ocean’, a piece expressly inspired by the composer’s rumination on the impacts of climate change: theguardian.com/culture/2022/f…
According to CEO of Climate Analytics, Bill Hare, if all countries acted on the same principles as @WoodsideEnergy, the world is headed for the unmitigated catastrophe of global temperature increase of between 3C and 4C: theguardian.com/environment/20…
Humanity can still build a bridge to a world of regeneration and future flourishing - but only if the likes of @WoodsideEnergy are held to account.
It's time to rid our institutions of the scourge of 'reputation washing' by fossil fuel corporations. arena.org.au/gaslit-futures…'
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lest we forget…
As the new Australian Parliament begins work, it is worth remembering that the last government led by @ScotMorrison was truly a ‘wrecking crew’.
Post-election revelations have reminded us just how much damage they did.
Here’s a thread…
🧵#auspol#wreckingcrew
Infamously, Scott Morrison indicated to fellow believers at his church last weekend that it is right not to have trust in government. 'Wrecking crew' politicians want none of us to have trust in government. theguardian.com/australia-news…
A decade or so ago, US commentator Tom Frank coined the idea of ‘wrecking crew’ politicians who - perversely - deliberately or recklessly seek to govern badly in order to advance an extreme ideological agenda: tcfrank.com/product/the-wr…
Angry about yesterday’s State of the Environment report?
Well, there’s an opportunity to do something practical within the next 24 hours, by lodging an appeal against Woodside being allowed to extend massive fossil gas polluting operations until 2070.🧵 soe.dcceew.gov.au
The background is that WA’s environmental agency (EPA) has recommended that this extension to Woodside’s vast pollution operations be approved - which would mean locking around 50 years’ more of climate-wrecking fossil gas extraction on a massive scale: theguardian.com/australia-news…
The EPA did not assess the impacts from the gas when it is actually burned by end-users.
Yet, if approved, it is estimated that the North West Shelf extension would pump out 4.3 billion tonnes of pollution from climate-wrecking gas over the coming decades: abc.net.au/news/2022-06-3…
Hey @AngusTaylorMP you look surprised by the catastrophic flooding events.
Can this be because you have been ignoring the warnings about climate change impacts?
Here's a dozen or so expert warnings about increases in storms and floods that you may have ignored...
🧵: #auspol
The truth is that we have long known, for decades, that for each degree that our atmosphere warms, it can hold 7% more water. This causes heavier rainfall and in turn increased flood risk: int-res.com/articles/cr_oa…
14 years ago, in 2007, the Rudd Government commissioned the Garnaut Climate Change Review, which clearly identified that climate change would lead to “longer dry spells broken by heavier rainfall events” and floods: webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/2019050908…
This week's electricity price spikes are largely due to Australia’s continued reliance on dirty, ageing, expensive coal and gas.
This debacle has been years in the making.
The Morrison government failed to do its job and coal and gas vested interests fought change. 🧵#auspol
While the price hikes are in part due to the cold snap increasing demand plus a global energy supply squeeze from the Ukraine war, the main culprit is the fossil fuel industry, which has persistently attempted to wreck Australia’s transition to cleaner, cheaper renewable energy:
Research by @DrAdamLucas found that fossil fuel corporations had ‘constructed a covert network of lobbyists and revolving door appointments which has ensured that industry interests continue to dominate Australia’s energy policy’: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Today, Australia’s largest domestic climate polluter @AGLAustralia abandoned plans to ‘demerge’, to keep burning coal until the 2040s.
Combined with last weekend’s election result, this is a watershed for climate action in Australia.
Let’s unpack what it means 🧵: #ausbiz#auspol
@AGLAustralia is our country’s biggest climate polluter responsible for 10% of our annual domestic greenhouse gas emissions.
What happened today is totally unprecedented.
The restructure of a massive iconic corporation collapsed because of a failure to act on climate change.
To quote my colleague @Glenn_Walker_ AGL’s leadership has presided over the “most bungled and misguided attempt at a corporate restructure in Australian history”.
But it is a fiasco that was a long time in the making… investordaily.com.au/markets/51424-…
Today I attended the @WoodsideEnergy AGM in Perth to hold the fossil fuel behemoth to account for its destructive gas expansion plans.
The AGM revealed Woodside's astounding arrogance, with execs disregarding expert analysis on its huge climate and financial risk. 🧵 #auspol
For background, despite the IEA, among other experts, stating we need no new gas, coal or oil projects to reach net zero by 2050, Woodside plans to build the most climate-polluting project ever proposed in Australia off the coast of WA - the Burrup Hub.
There is no question the Burrup Hub proposal is in abject opposition to the Paris Climate Agreement and flies in the face of a safer future for Australians and our environment. climateanalytics.org/media/climatea…