If you have some time, read Chapter Five (page 71) of the IG report on how @Comey's FBI went about Hillary's emails. For example, the feds got "consent" to search "most" (not all Clinton devices).

Fun stuff because #NoOneIsAboveTheLaw

justice.gov/file/1071991/d…
What I didn't know until today is that the classified (including top secret) emails found in #ButHerEmails were only among the 30K+ emails handed over by Clinton's staff and not the 31K+ they deleted under claim that it was "personal."
Feds "Did not seek to obtain every device including those of Clinton’s senior aides, or the contents of every email account... Reasons for not doing so were based on limitations the Midyear team imposed... [with] the desire to complete the investigation well before the election."
Basically, Comey's FBI wanted to wrap up the email investigation before the election so much that they didn't collect all devices! (They assumed she will win.)

Yet when Trump won, they continued "investigating" him.

HRC would be off the hook had she won; not Trump if he won.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

Aug 12
1/4 On Inauguration Day, the outgoing POTUS does not personally have physical access to classified documents to fill 25 boxes at will and to secretly direct the movers to corruptly whisk it away. So any talk of Trump "stealing/taking" boxes of such documents is a clown show.
2/4 Can a new admin claim that some documents should not have been given? Yes. But if you read beyond the clickbait headlines and dramatic intros, the "concern" was the security. Did Bush 43 check Clinton's security at Chappaqua?

From the NYT via @politicalwire:
3/4 Basically, staffers decide which docs can go with a POTUS, but senior people in a new admin have the legal (corruptly-used) power to claim that some documents were given by mistake and can also claim (corruptly) that it's not securely stored; hence the new locks in June. 😃
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12
🚨 🚨 🚨

There were 10 boxes of nuclear secrets laying around at MAL for 18 months tucked into Melania's cloths that it took 30 agents 9 hours to collect.

3:00 PM: Garland Asks How Dare You Critique the Feds.

5:00 PM: FBI Wray Echos the Same Points.

8:00 PM: Those Upstanding Above Board Feds Leak an Incomplete/Misleading Claim About Nuclear Secrets to a State-Aligned Press Office.
In a matter of 8 hours we went from "this isn't a raid and Garland didn't even know about it,"

to

"Of course GARLAND approved a RAID: We needed to save NUCLEAR DOCS from Trump!"

Soon they will say Biden was briefed due to the risk, but he deferred to DOJ "career officials."
Read 4 tweets
Aug 11
A) Why buy a self-serving claim about Garland's role?

B) Subordinates taking action on their own "for good of country/law" is a tool for corrupt abuse in authoritarian regimes.

Same goes for Gen Milley. He can't decide what's good for country over orders of Commander in Chief.
It's funny and sad to listen to CBS, ABC and other networks pro-government propaganda as we await Garland's presser.

Sad how "media" isn't behaving adverserial to government action.

Funny because their wording and lines can easily be refuted if they were, well, media; not PR.
Many commentators on Dem TV argued that the raid neded to be much more than classified documents or else they would not make a raid.

Haha. Really?

Anyway. Let's see Garland's spin and how those commentators will "explain" that classified docs are enough to have raided.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 11
🧵 🧵 🧵

The nature and gravity of corruption is that if gone unaccounted, it gets worse. Consider this: A few years ago, Trump was "suspected" of being a stooge of a foreign power due to blackmail and collusion. Right? It was a "clear and present danger."
2/5 Yet despite this, Mueller & Weissman didn't have the guts to subpoena a POTUS (or even his children). The SC didn't move on POTUS. Instead, it left it to Congress to decide. Yet 3 years later, the home of a former president was raided by Obama's definition of a fair guy.
3/5 The raid was done despite the underlying issue (whatever it may be) not being such a clear "danger" as what was "feared" when Trump was POTUS; being beholden to an adversary.

Th raid done because @jeffsessions, RR, @MattWhitaker46 and Joker Barr gave corrupt goons a pass.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 10
2 of the charges against Roger Stone were about records to Congress. One direct; the other Obstruction. Those two could have been levied on Hillary and/or on all those directly involved in beach-cleaning servers after her records were subpoenaed by Congress.

yes: #ButHerEmails
Stone was raided. Trump was raided. Yet not #ButHerEmails @HillaryClinton which were i corruptly deleted and beach-cleaned after a subpoena by Congress. Imagine the pay-to-play crimes those emails contained that HRC & Co violated, apparently, multiple laws to dispose of them.
3/4 The #ButHerEmails likely contained pay-to-play involving Foundation/State Depo and ran afoul of Records Keeping and classified doc laws.

So you have

- corruption
- obstruction of Justice/Congress;
- records keeping
- Classified

All in one.

How many raids/indictments?
Read 4 tweets
Aug 10
What a partisan hack of a clown this @JustinWolfers is. Inflation in July was 8.5% higher from a year ago. No change month over month does not mean no inflation.

"Holy COW: The car at 100 MPH is not speeding because it's at 100 continuously and not above it."
Note that @JustinWolfers's first tweet with the misleading or at best incomplete data got more play than the second more accurate one.

This propaganda my friends is why most Dem Admin avoid economic panics: Masses are kept calm even when things are bad Image
Great headlines all around today about inflation "easing."

July had the worst year over year jump in inflation since the early 1980s but for May and June of this year.

In terms of inflation the last 24 months, July was still the worst since the 1980's.

Rejoice. "Eased." Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(