THREAD Russians are fierce about the #visaban. It is impressive to see how Russians from the most liberal ones to the Putin's ambassadors use the same language here. A liberal professor Mironov says "the goal (of the West) is to lock Russians in the Putin's concentration camp" /1
A former program coordinator of a German think-tank in Moscow compares visa bans with napalm bombardments of Russia. In comments to a post she mentions, Russians compare the ban with the Holocaust ("they want to put red stars on our cloth") call Zelensky Nazi, and blame the US /2
Russian right-wing libertarian icon Latynina goes further and brings an argument, if Russians id not get visa, Salman Rushdi should be deported to Iran. As she probably believes Rushdi was an Iranian migrant (he was not, he is the Indian-born UK and US citizen, but who cares) /3
What is the reason for all this outcry? Well, Russians are being hurt in their sacred feeling: the feeling to be exceptional. This is one of the basic emotions in Russian self-assessment and roots in deep cultural racism. Russians KNOW they are better than others. /4
Like most of the attempts to bring a white cis-male in a patriarchal world to reason lead to outcry "you feminists try to discriminate against me!" - Russians literally see themselves as victims of the Holocaust (!) because they cannot get a tourist visa to Austria anymore. /5
It is a full lack of moral or legal self-reflection. This reminds me of a case as a Ukrainian journalist shared a photo a Russian state-media journalist made in Russia-occupied Mariupol, and got a shitstrom from a Russian editor, who said the Ukrainian guy infringes copyright /6
You see the pattern? "My rights are sacred, and they include even the rights nobody heard about, like to accompany my army to a destroyed city in a neighbor country - and I don't care about the others' rights or feelings" /7
Same time, Russians totally ignore the fact, that 1) there are a lot of countries where they can go even without visa if they want to exit Russia, and 2) The right to obtain asylum in the EU was not affected by the tourist visa ban, as asylum is a human right (and tourism not) /8
Well, it is NOT about fear of missing a chance to leave Russia. There are thousands of ways to do it: and definitely more ways than for example Afghan people have. It is about the feeling to be exceptional, traveling to Europe for holidays while the RU army destroys Ukraine /9
As I said above - it is about the fundamental lack of self-reflection or basic empathy. It is the same imperialism that inspires even the "best" Russian liberal to bring a Russian flag to a Ukrainian protest, and "express support" of liberal Russians, saying "we suffer too". /10
This summer, the Ukrainian LGBT community organized Kyiv Pride in Warsaw, and clearly asked Russians who planned to come, not to bring Russian flags, which trigger war refugees. Many Russians were insulted and said they will bring flags "because we suffer in Russia too". /11
It is about hijacking any non-Russian event; about not allowing the very idea that any nation may want to go its way without Russian advice, or that Russian involvement may not be welcomed. And once again - a total lack of empathy. The visa ban outcry has the same nature. /END
PS The legal questions behind and around the #visaban were described here:
THREAD The German argumentation "tourist visa for Russians stay as a way to escape" is twisted. A tourist visa is issued after a person proves their income, stable job in Russia, etc. This means, @Bundeskanzler reserves a right to escape for those with money and job only. 1/x
To apply for a visa, a person needs to go to the next consulate. This can be a way of thousand miles (red area: consulate district Novosibirsk). Of course, no journalist from Yakutsk, fired from their job for criticism of Putin, would ever be able to get a German tourist visa 2/x
People who work in Moscow, often are not registered there, as their landlords hide rental contracts from the tax office. Such persons can apply for a visa in Moscow by presenting a job contract. But what to do if one does not have one anymore? Go back to Novosibirsk to apply? 3/x
THREAD Let me say some words about the #visaban debate. 1) Visa rules (or in general entry regulations) are always based on a presumption that all holders of one passport can be preferred or discriminated against compared to holders of another passport; /1
1.1) For example, ANY Russian citizen had to obtain a visa to enter the EU, independently on the proven income, education, job, family status etc. At the same time, Ukrainians could travel visa-free. At the same time, the US citizens could not only enter visa-free, but also... /2
1.1)...apply for a long-term student residence permit after a visa-free entry, while Ukrainians (or many other non-EU nations, which had visa-free entry) could not. You see the pattern? There is no "most favoured nation rule" in visa rules. Nations are being treated differently/3
THREAD This video shows a Russian occupant who leaves Crimea after yesterday's attack. She says: "I don't want to leave Crimea, Alushta. It is so amazing here. We got used to living here. We lived like it is our own. We felt like at home here". /1
Russia transferred 1,000,000 of Russian citizens to Crimea after the annexation in order to replace the local population, who partly left Crimea and partly was oppressed/arrested/sentenced/relocated, whose property was seized, businesses hijacked. /2
There is nothing new in this ethnic cleansing / replacement policy. In 1944 Crimea Tatars were mass deported from Crimea to Siberia and Central Asia. They were banned from return home. Same time, Moscow called ethnic Russians to "go to and settle on the rich lands of Crimea" /3
The importance of the Novofedorivka strike is hard to overestimate. Militarily, it is one of the key positions for Russian air strikes against the South of Ukraine. The destruction of this airfield with probably dozens of planes is huge. But it is way more important politically/1
Ukraine has archived a mega goal. Ukrainians have attacked Crimea: Russia’s “holy trophy” and “invulnerable fortress”. The attacked took place amid daylight with visible devastating results. This is why the reaction of Russian tourists is so precious: they are overwhelmed /2
Further, Ukraine has eliminated the Air Force base. Air Force is not some Buryats-filled infantry barrack, but mostly ethnic-Russian elite troops. Amid Putin’s presidential campaign 2012, cartoonist Zashtopik who also produced pedophile comics, played with jet pilot motives:
Unconfirmed reports on 4 Ukrainian missile strikes at Russian airfield Novofedorivka in Crimea. If true - the first strike on Russia-occupied Crimea (not counting offshore gas rigs). Can be the consequences of decimated RU air defense: 14 SAM systems knocked out within 3 days.
Earlier, reports came on usage of the US anti-radiation AGM-88 HARM missiles, high-speed radar killers. This seems to be the next Western 1980s weapon (after the Javelins, HIMARS etc) Russians have no idea how to protect themselves from. What a disgrace :) defence-blog.com/russian-troops…
So my guess: knocked-out Russians SAMs allowed Ukrainians to launch Tochkas without any air-defense fire. Of course other options are possible too.
#BREAKING THREAD Head of Amnesty Ukraine @OPokalchuk says, that today's report by @amnesty was NOT prepared by Amnesty UKR. Further scandalous facts: 1) Data used by Amnesty Intl did not come not from Amnesty Ukraine, but from some international researchers (obviously parachuted)
2) Ukrainian office did not participate in either preparation or writing of the report; 3) "Already in the early stage, we get into a dead end". "None of the arguments by our team about the inadmissibility of this incomplete report were taken into consideration" /2
4) Ukraine office "has done anything possible to prevent this publication", but "multiply objections" by the Office Ukraine were answered "with no without any compromises"; 5) No working versions of report were sent to Kyiv office; /3