Thread by @TheUfoJoe

1 Fine w/NASA & #ufos but SS article is lacking, as usual.

"by seeking to flag anomalous, unexplained occurrences in NASA’s data, scientists are at least as likely to discover new, exotic-but-earthly atmospheric phenomena as they are 2 find any credible evidence of ET visitors"

https://twitter.com/SicCoP1/status/1559554787816906755

2 If I could rewrite the SS article:

"...scientists are at least as likely to discover new, exotic-but-earthly atmospheric phenomena as they are to find any credible evidence of ET visitors. However, they may also learn that said earthly, atmospheric phenomena may turn out to be

3 "something totally unexpected, more exotic & paradigm-changing than they bargained for. Last year, former director of the CIA, John Brennan said UFOs, 'could involve some type of activity that some might say constitutes a different form of life.' If Brennan, who obviously had

4 access to data most of us may never see, turns out to be right, what will it mean for humanity and our place in the cosmos? Or, more importantly, our place on our own planet, in our own backyard? Are we about to learn human beings aren't at the top of the food chain?

5 Is there something else here that remains elusive & more intelligent than all of our top scientists put together? And if that's the case, how will humanity handle such news, & how will NASA or some other government agency disseminate the information? Or will they just sit on

6 it because it has the potential to upset lots of apple carts all over the globe?

~End of my hypothetical article~

SS said experts need to, "strike a balance between open-mindedness & rigorous skepticism"
|
How about rigorous open-mindedness, @ScolesSarah?

Stop focusing on ET

7 Tweets 2-6 are what I would have written and what any journalist familiar with the subject matter may have written.