1).
The straw man fallacy by Sergey Sumlenny

Mr. Sergey @sumlenny, a Russian political scientist; writer and journalist; Independent Eastern Europe Expert, former Regional Director Ukraine and Belarus at the Heinrich Böll Foundation living in Germany [1],
2).
creates a psychological profile of the infamous prof. Aleksandr Dugin based on an article by Marina Golubina. It is a Gnostic interpretation of the known – from what I can see, however, not for everyone – tales of the son of Abraham (Gen. 22:8-14) and the daughter of
3).
Jephthah (Judg 11:1–12:7 ) from the Old Testament. In the opinion of Mr. Sumlenny, it is peculiar apotheosis of children in sacrifice (especially daughters as emphasizes). It should be noted that the story about Jephthahʼs daughter is not taken literally by everyone;
4).
St. Philaret [Vasily Mikhaylovich Drozdov] (1782–1867), just like Jewish scholars – Rabbi David Kimhi (1160–1235) and Levi Ben Gershon (1288–1344) have a different opinion than St. John Chrysostom (c . 347–407) [2].
5).
Mr. Sumlenny, in order to critique Dugin, do you have to „attacking a straw man”? Did you inform about what Dugin wrote about, for example, Poland? [3]. If so, I am sorry; Iʼm not following all your posts. If not, why do you avoid the essence of things? After all,
6).
there are scientific articles on the main ideologist #RusskiyMir [4].

If Dugin did write an article in which – like the worshipers of Baal and Moloch – he recommends the of the children in sacrifice, Mr. @sumlenny should include a link to it.
7).
Admittedly, this is not Sumlennyʼs first „brilliant” Twitter comment. On March 7, 2021 posted a twitt about Stepan Bandera (1909–1959). Namely, he called the leader of the OUN-B „Ukrainian freedom champion”. I stress that I just mean this quote; I do not approve of
8).
the devastation of any resting places of the dead [5]. June 30, 2022 posted:
– „Germans should humbly shut up about Bandera at least, or (better and recommend) kneel and ask for forgiveness”.
Why? Because the Germans sent him to KL Sachsenchausen [6].
9).
The immediate initiator of the Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia (1943–1945) [7] was former officer of the Battalion Ukrainische Gruppe Nachtigall [8] Roman Szuchevycz (1907–1950). In the order issued on February 25, 1944, he stated:
10).
– „In view of the success of the Soviet forces it is necessary to speed up the liquidation of the Poles, they must be totally wiped out, their villages burned... only the Polish population must be destroyed”.
11).
According to the most probable hypothesis, the decision to genocide Poles was made by a group of three people from the Volyn leadership of the OUN-B: Dmytro Klyachkivsky (1911–1945), Vasyl Ivakhiv (1908–1943) and Ivan Lytvynchuk (1917 –1952).
12).
Stepan Bandera, leader of the OUN-B, although he was incarcerated by the Germans at KL Sachsenhausen (1941–1944) during the Volhynia massacre – therefore he could not direct the genocide – it is a co-creator of the ideology that will lead to it [9].
13).
The scope of involvement of the Soviet secret services and the hypotheses regarding the Soviet inspiration cannot be resolved without access to the documentation of these services, which is in secret special collections of the Russian Federation. According to
14).
dr. Grzegorz Hryciuk [10] and prof. Grzegorz Motyka [11], the hypothesis of Soviet provocation when making decisions about ethnic cleansing should, however, be firmly rejected. There is no documented case of an attack by NKVD disguised as UPA on any Polish village [12].
15).
Prosecutor Piotr Zając from the Department @ipngovpl of the Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation considers that the extermination command was issued in the leadership of the OUN-UPA, and an additional factor factor determining
16).
the genocide was mass participation of agitated Ukrainians peasants by Ukrainian nationalism. As noted by prof. @TimothyDSnyder [13], a similar social and historical situation was in the territory of present-day Belarus, but there were no purges on Poles there.
17).
The difference was the nationalist ideology, which was not widespread among Belarusians [14].

At first I thought I was just dealing with Mr @sumlenny mistake [15]; well no one is omniscient. Meanwhile, it turns out that this is to oversimplify, and maybe something else?
18).
Finally, I would like to stress itʼs not my goal to attack and discredit Sergey @sumlenny; his profile contains a lot of valuable and interesting information. I myself sometimes make mistakes, however, in such a case, I always try to post a the correction.
19).
I am simply very critical of any content posted on the Internet. I am of the opinion that everyone should do the same to eliminate desinformation.

Greeting cordial from Poland 𓃠

Footnotes:

[1] de.linkedin.com/in/sergej-suml…

calvertjournal.com/contributors/s…
22).
The Simon Wiesenthal Center contends that between June 30 and July 3, 1941, in the days that the Battalion was in Lviv the Nachtigall soldiers together with the German army and the local Ukrainians participated in the killings of Jews in the city. The pretext for the
23).
pogrom was a rumor that the Jews were responsible for the execution of prisoners by the Soviets before the 1941 Soviet withdrawal from Lviv. „The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust” states that some 4,000 Jews were kidnapped and killed at that time.

web.archive.org/web/2008021208…
26).
PS

PDF files can be translated using Xodo PDF Reader & Editor.

server.xodo.com

apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/x…
Please unroll @threadreaderapp. Thank you in advance 𓃠

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝕭𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕶𝖔𝖙 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖚𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖔𝖇𝖊

𝕭𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕶𝖔𝖙 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖚𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖔𝖇𝖊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrajanKot

Aug 23
@nexta_tv 2).
Russia – expansion of the Third Rome

For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles,
@nexta_tv 3).
nor Russophobes. Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 21
1).
Decyzja zapadła, oznajmił głos dzwonu,
Na szczeblu najwyższym Grupy Bildelberg.
Podjęta pod CPK w bunkrze Mędrców Syjonu,
Ażeby W InTheAss24 zwolnił swój bieg.
2).
– „BEdEU redaGDoreU” – przed laty wpadł Rola na pomysł nienowy,
A pomógł był jemu Adam Zięcina, onegdaj.
Lecz nie na darmo czosnek wszedł mocno do jego łysej głowy;
Jak w InTheAss24, tak i na swoim portalu o datki żebra.
3).
Ażeby współczuć mu jęczy płaczliwie: „Pieniędzy daj!”
Czy jednak aby na pewno, sam nie zbanował siebie?
Być może w tym celu bezideowiec utworzył Patataj,
Wszak bez pieniędzy byłby w trudnej potrzebie.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 21
@SamRamani2 1).
Russia – expansion of the Third Rome

For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles,
@SamRamani2 2).
nor Russophobes. Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
@SamRamani2 3).
They reserved no less virulent attacks for other messianisms; the socialist narodnichestvo of Alexander Ivanovich Herzen (1812–1870); Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhaylovsky (1842–1904); Pyotr Nikitich Tkachev (1844–1886); Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814–1876);
Read 10 tweets
Aug 20
1).
– „Trudno znaleźć słowa, kiedy twoja córka okazuje się zdrajczynią” – deputowany Isakow wyrzeka się córki, która udzielając wywiadu @meduzaproject wystąpiła przeciwko wojnie

Eduard Isakow, deputowany Rady Federacji z Chanty-Mansyjskiego Okręgu Autonomicznego – Jugra,
2).
publicznie wyrzekł się swojej najstarszej córki Diany, która w wywiadzie dla @meduzaproject zajęła stanowisko antywojenne.

Komentując materiały medialne o swojej córce (artykuł o niej, oprócz @meduzaproject, opublikował także rosyjski serwis @BBC [1]),
3).
Isakow określił Dianę mianem „zdrajcy”, sugerując, iż otrzymała wynagrodzenie pieniężne za wywiad.

– „Zajęła stanowisko przeciwko prowadzeniu specjalnej operacji wojskowej, przeciwko polityce jej kraju. Podobno dostała pieniądze do mediów, czyli sprzedała ojca, rodzinę,
Read 7 tweets
Aug 15
@_Miroslav_100 1).
For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles, nor Russophobes.
@_Miroslav_100 2).
Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
@_Miroslav_100 3).
They reserved no less virulent attacks for other messianisms; the socialist narodnichestvo of Alexander Ivanovich Herzen (1812–1870); Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhaylovsky (1842–1904); Pyotr Nikitich Tkachev (1844–1886); Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814–1876);
Read 9 tweets
Aug 13
@nexta_tv I.
As he admits dr. Boris Leonidovich Zhuikov [1], it is very unlikely that the reactor core will be damaged in a way that will release its radioactivity in a catastrophe similar to the one that happened in Chernobyl in 1986; this is pure fantasy [2].
@nexta_tv II.
Due to its design, the reactor in Zaporizhzhia would be very difficult to destroy. A more accurate comparison of a potential catastrophe that may occur is the one that took place in Fukushima in 2011 [3].
@nexta_tv III.
Despite the fact that there are currently no further dangerous RBMK Reactors under construction in Russian Federation it is the only country where still operate reactors of Soviet design:

1). Leningrad (2 RBMK-1000):
Leningrad-3 is expected to shut down in 2025
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(