Sir Francis Profile picture
Aug 22 11 tweets 3 min read
Among the countless un-conservative features of today's right wing, possibly the most un-conservative is their total lack of cultural memory. Collectively, the Canadian right's grasp of history is roughly equal to that of pubic lice.

Now, sometimes that amnesia is deliberate...
Take the right's current pants-wetting hysteria over the "Great Reset", allegedly being enacted by a shadowy cabal of globalists headed by Klaus Schwab. Yes, it's a deeply unhinged conspiracy theory on the order of the Elders of Zion. It's also espoused by mainstream CPC figures
Some Rebel Media chud is apparently doing a "documentary" on it.

Here's the thing. The North American right have been the world's foremost disciples of globalisation for over 40 years...
Globalisation, offshoring, direct foreign investment, capital/labour mobility, customs unions, borderless transactions, deregulation--these have all been neoconservative dogma. It's been called the "Washington Consensus", and it's been Holy Writ for Canada's right wing...
In Canada, this dogma is ancient, particularly on the Prairies. Sask-Albertan farmers were demanding free trade with the US in the early 20th century. Peter Lougheed made a federal commitment to free trade a condition of his support for Mulroney...
In a real sense, Canadian globalisation (like Canadian socialism) is a Prairie invention, with free trade serving as the gateway drug.

To the extent that globalisation menaces Canadian sovereignty, that menace is a right-wing product...
Not only did Canada's right wing invent and promote globalisation, but it demonised anti-globalisation activists, hurling puerile invective at people like Maude Barlow & revelling in the sight of anti-globalisation protesters being truncheoned in the streets at G7/G10 summits...
As if to confirm their longstanding reputation as vacant-headed zombies incapable of expressing a concept unless it's put there by some American crank, they changed their tune & became "nationalists" only when Donald Trump made it look like a good idea...
Thus, in a truly astonishing feat of supreme irony, even their nationalism is foreign-made. These imbeciles just can't do anything right.

Sure. Some of our younger right-wingers may be unaware that everything they deplore about "globalism" is the product of their own ideology...
They are simply ignorant, which is to be expected in a right winger, by mere definition. But people my age or near it--the Kenneys, the Berniers, the Poilievres--they know better. They know full well that they and their ilk have engineered what they pretend to stand against...
That's the key point: A right-wing politician in Canada doesn't need to commit malfeasance in office in order to be a fraud. Such a politician is *always already* a fraud, categorically and as such.

#CPCLdr #cpc #PierrePoilievre

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sir Francis

Sir Francis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Dred_Tory

Mar 31
There's a new phenomenon I call "conwashing", whereby headlines are written to reflect something radically different from (and sometimes contrary to) the article's content, with the effect of making a right-wing voice seem more acceptable. Case in point:

calgary.ctvnews.ca/some-conservat…
The disconnect between the headline & the actual piece (in both article & video form) is total. First, the use of "some conservatives" (plural) is irrational because only one MP (Rempel-Garner) is cited. And she doesn't say she disagrees with Thomas. She says the opposite...
While burbling some generalities about how important it is to use "precise" language, she doesn't admonish Thomas or any of her CPC colleagues. In fact, she blames Trudeau's use of the EA for their vitriol, implying that, while accusations of "dictatorship" may be imprecise...
Read 9 tweets
Oct 13, 2021
We speak of the banality of evil. We could also speak of the virulence of mediocrity.

JFK's effortless charm, beauty, and privilege turned Richard Nixon's inferiority complex into a wasting disease that devoured his soul. There's a straight line from Camelot to Watergate...
Similarly, the unhinged hatred of Trudeau on the right has little to do with policy. There's something distinctly Salieri-esque about the rancid bile that sluices forth from the Poilievres and the Rex Murphys...
What I hear is the despairing cry of a toothless, carbuncular dotard in a lazar house, weeping into his gruel at the thought that God could be so vicious as to incarnate everything he coveted & aspired to be in the body of a contemptible knave he finds impossible to respect...
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25, 2021
Call it "a tale of two tweets". In one, a NatPost scribe thanks America (but, really, when is a NatPost scribe *not* thanking America?). In the other, the same scribe is conjecturing, entirely without evidence, that the Biden admin inserted itself into a juridical process...
The tweets are at their most interesting when paired, but each is charming enough on its own. In the first, Canadian efforts to secure the release of the #TwoMichaels are damned by omission, even though we have zero info on what their impact was. Their nullity is assumed...
This is based on two dogmatic NatPost principles:

1) Americans are infallible, incorruptible supermen who are responsible for everything good in the world;

2) Canadians can't succeed except by accident or unless the US gives them the required instructions and/or gizmos...
Read 14 tweets
Sep 25, 2021
My brand of Toryism is built on a rejection of two modern beliefs: 1) the perfectability of human nature & 2) the Whig version of history, which posits that civilisation progresses on a straight line via which, on average, things get better and people become wiser...
The latter belief implies that societies learn lessons.

Every day offers new proof that they don't. In today's example, we have Canadians, most right-wing but many claiming to be "progressive", begging to jump on America's Yellow Peril Cold War II bandwagon....
I guess they didn't learn (or can't learn) the lessons of the first Cold War. They seem unaware of the instructive power of the paranoid state repression & routine violations of basic civil liberties committed at home & the genocidal proxy wars waged abroad....
Read 5 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
I've been reading reviews of Gwynne Dyer's "Canada in the Great Power Game, 1914-2014" to see if it's worth getting. It seems to be. This (not entirely glowing) review puts things into perspective nicely.

londonpoetryopenmic.com/frank-davey-bl…
A excerpt:

"New agreements with the United States have brought about a situation in which the Canadian military have more confidential information about world security and US policies than Canadian government ministers are allowed to have...
..and the tail is beginning to wag the dog. Diefenbaker signs the NORAD agreement without knowing all that his military understand about it. During the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, a Canadian admiral, on the advice of his military, orders compliance with a US military request...
Read 8 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
Whenever the CPC loses & debate about the party's ideology resumes, one vocal segment of the base always argues some version of "We don't need two Liberal parties!" It's a truism that masks an absurdity...
Imagine if R.J. Manion's Tories had voted against Mackenzie King's declaration of war against Germany, instead moving a motion approving of Hitler's invasion of Poland & wishing him every success, merely to avoid being too much "like the Liberals"...
That's the kind of poltroonery you end up with if your raison d'être is founded on a negative dialectics whereby you premise your existence on a state of not-being someone else.

Maybe the CPC should focus less on not-being (i.e. other parties) & more on *being* something...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(