@nexta_tv 2).
Russia – expansion of the Third Rome
For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles,
@nexta_tv 3).
nor Russophobes. Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
@nexta_tv 4).
They reserved no less virulent attacks for other messianisms; the socialist narodnichestvo of Alexander Ivanovich Herzen (1812–1870); Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhaylovsky (1842–1904); Pyotr Nikitich Tkachev (1844–1886); Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814–1876);
@nexta_tv 5).
Pyotr Lavrovich Lavrov (1823–1900), and for many others Russian socialists who shared the „the childish conception” that the Russians were to be „the chosen people of Socialism”, believing that the „rotten and degenerate” West could be renewed by the Russians.
@nexta_tv 6).
The very fact of the outbreak of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was a deviates significantly from the assumptions of Marxism, which envisaged an upheaval of the proletariat in an industrialized country, and not in an agricultural country like Russia at that time.
@nexta_tv 7).
The idea of a Third Rome, modified for the needs of Bolshevik expansion in the form of the Third International, became for Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870–1924) what he was looking for. By rejecting any religious element, it institutes the most rigorous atheism.
@nexta_tv 8).
Instead of the religious mystery, which stood at the center of Slavophilic thought, there is the positive science Soviet academics, proved indisputably as absolute knowledge. Marxism in the peculiarly in Gnostic terms of Lenin becomes Leninism,
@nexta_tv 9).
officially imposed ideology in the Soviet Union, later transformed by Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (1878–1953) – to dissociate themselves from Trotskyism – into Marxism-Leninism.
Mr. Sergey @sumlenny, a Russian political scientist; writer and journalist; Independent Eastern Europe Expert, former Regional Director Ukraine and Belarus at the Heinrich Böll Foundation living in Germany [1],
2).
creates a psychological profile of the infamous prof. Aleksandr Dugin based on an article by Marina Golubina. It is a Gnostic interpretation of the known – from what I can see, however, not for everyone – tales of the son of Abraham (Gen. 22:8-14) and the daughter of
3).
Jephthah (Judg 11:1–12:7 ) from the Old Testament. In the opinion of Mr. Sumlenny, it is peculiar apotheosis of children in sacrifice (especially daughters as emphasizes). It should be noted that the story about Jephthahʼs daughter is not taken literally by everyone;
1).
Decyzja zapadła, oznajmił głos dzwonu,
Na szczeblu najwyższym Grupy Bildelberg.
Podjęta pod CPK w bunkrze Mędrców Syjonu,
Ażeby W InTheAss24 zwolnił swój bieg.
2).
– „BEdEU redaGDoreU” – przed laty wpadł Rola na pomysł nienowy,
A pomógł był jemu Adam Zięcina, onegdaj.
Lecz nie na darmo czosnek wszedł mocno do jego łysej głowy;
Jak w InTheAss24, tak i na swoim portalu o datki żebra.
3).
Ażeby współczuć mu jęczy płaczliwie: „Pieniędzy daj!”
Czy jednak aby na pewno, sam nie zbanował siebie?
Być może w tym celu bezideowiec utworzył Patataj,
Wszak bez pieniędzy byłby w trudnej potrzebie.
@SamRamani2 1).
Russia – expansion of the Third Rome
For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles,
@SamRamani2 2).
nor Russophobes. Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
@SamRamani2 3).
They reserved no less virulent attacks for other messianisms; the socialist narodnichestvo of Alexander Ivanovich Herzen (1812–1870); Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhaylovsky (1842–1904); Pyotr Nikitich Tkachev (1844–1886); Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814–1876);
1).
– „Trudno znaleźć słowa, kiedy twoja córka okazuje się zdrajczynią” – deputowany Isakow wyrzeka się córki, która udzielając wywiadu @meduzaproject wystąpiła przeciwko wojnie
Eduard Isakow, deputowany Rady Federacji z Chanty-Mansyjskiego Okręgu Autonomicznego – Jugra,
2).
publicznie wyrzekł się swojej najstarszej córki Diany, która w wywiadzie dla @meduzaproject zajęła stanowisko antywojenne.
Komentując materiały medialne o swojej córce (artykuł o niej, oprócz @meduzaproject, opublikował także rosyjski serwis @BBC [1]),
3).
Isakow określił Dianę mianem „zdrajcy”, sugerując, iż otrzymała wynagrodzenie pieniężne za wywiad.
– „Zajęła stanowisko przeciwko prowadzeniu specjalnej operacji wojskowej, przeciwko polityce jej kraju. Podobno dostała pieniądze do mediów, czyli sprzedała ojca, rodzinę,
@_Miroslav_100 1).
For Karl Marx Russia was an extremely dangerous and uncivilized power with a constant desire for expansion that could only be blocked by military force. Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) were neither Russophiles, nor Russophobes.
@_Miroslav_100 2).
Their hatred was not directed against the Russian people and all of Russia as such. Its subject was tsarist autocracy. They were equally disliked by messianic Slavophilia, which they saw as a tool for the expansion of Russian despotism.
@_Miroslav_100 3).
They reserved no less virulent attacks for other messianisms; the socialist narodnichestvo of Alexander Ivanovich Herzen (1812–1870); Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhaylovsky (1842–1904); Pyotr Nikitich Tkachev (1844–1886); Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814–1876);
@nexta_tv I.
As he admits dr. Boris Leonidovich Zhuikov [1], it is very unlikely that the reactor core will be damaged in a way that will release its radioactivity in a catastrophe similar to the one that happened in Chernobyl in 1986; this is pure fantasy [2].
@nexta_tv II.
Due to its design, the reactor in Zaporizhzhia would be very difficult to destroy. A more accurate comparison of a potential catastrophe that may occur is the one that took place in Fukushima in 2011 [3].
@nexta_tv III.
Despite the fact that there are currently no further dangerous RBMK Reactors under construction in Russian Federation it is the only country where still operate reactors of Soviet design:
1). Leningrad (2 RBMK-1000):
Leningrad-3 is expected to shut down in 2025