In two weeks time Boris Johnson will be replaced as Prime Minister.. but he has been a critical political figure of the past decade so over the next fortnight I am going to dip into @UKandEU#Brexitwitnessarchive to paint a picture of him
Lets start with early Johnson. Former Eurocrat Jonathan Faull told us why there might have been a presumption that Johnson would understand Europe and the EU
But of course, his journalism in Brussels was about identifying comedy examples of EU red tape - it was on such a hunt that @OwenPaterson first encountered him and gives insight into his journalistic technique
and what about early euroscepticism. Former MP @DouglasCarswell remembers getting Johnson as Mayor on board for the "People's Pledge" in 2011. A straw in the wind?
Check out these and more for all your Johnson exit needs ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness… Tomorrow I'll add more on the battle for Boris in the run-up to the Referendum campaign itself.
so I am backing delving into the #Boriswitnessarchive. Suffice to say that with his Telegraph articles, the People's Pledge, and his single market support as Mayor noone knew which was Johnson would jump. They also knew it mattered.
Oliver Letwin was despatched by David Cameron to get Boris onto the Remain bus
But as Letwin said - he failed. we asked him why.
That decision surprised another Leave backer, David Davis
John Bercow told us about the impact that had on David Cameron - and on the campaign
A rather more positive view of the importance of Johnson and Gove to the Leave campaign came from Vote Leave Comms Director Paul Stephenson
and tomorrow I am going to focus on the campaign itself.... come back for me.. If you can't wait, loads more nuggets here ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness…
Back for day 3 - and its the campaign .. we ended with Paul Stephenson from Vote Leave - so lets start with him again about Boris as "political rock star"
One of the big issues in the campaign was the reluctance of Remain - with an eye to party unity post-election - to engage in blue-on-blue attacks (seems odd watching the leadership contest now...) @DavidGauke thought they should have gone harder
But it fell to @AmberRuddUK to take Johnson on in the debate
and that discipline was confirmed by his Brexit debate mate @GiselaStuart
Remain Campaign director Will Straw told us how hard it was to campaign against Johnson
So how much credit does Johnson deserve for the Leave win... well opinions may differ but lets go back to one of the original Eurosceptics who thinks that credit should be shared more widely
so here we are - I think - on instalment 4 of #boriswitnessarchive s- looking at the aftermath of the Leave vote... David Cameron had resigned and the nation was treated to that memorable Gang of Three press conference.
.@hilarybennmp thought that the leaders of Vote Leave were surprised by the result
and they seemed unprepared for what would happen next as David Davis points out
Douglas Carswell thought they failed to rise to the moment and deliver what was needed
The Cameron resignation meant there was a leadership contest .. the first for 11 years (different days back then...). Dominic Grieve pointed out lots of Leavers wanted Cameron to stay because they did not know what would happen next
But he noted a lot of anti-Boris sentiment - a stop Boris move
But not a view universally shared.. @AmberRuddUK thought that given the result, the post-referendum PM had to be a Leaver.
But she also pointed to the longer-term impact of the Gove-Johnson psychodrama
But did it make a difference to the type of Brexit. @mrchriswilkins who was strategy adviser to Theresa May thought it did
back again .. so the surprise in the May Cabinet (I remember jaws dropping) was that she appointed Boris Johnson became Foreign Secretary - Foreign Office permanent secretary @SimonMcDonaldUK told us about finding out who @FCDOGovUK were about to get
the missing word is "meeting".... But Johnson discovered that May was not going to let him have a significant role in the Brexit discussions. more from McDonald
The appointment raised eyebrows in Brussels as well as former UK perm rep Ivan Rogers told us
the dysfunctionality showed up in Johnson's suspicions of minutes of meetings in the Cabinet Committee - McDonald again
Johnson's Cabinet colleague @AmberRuddUK agreed that the Cabinet Committee was very weird - and Johnson was not the only one frustrated by it
Instead there was a separate process by passing the Cabinet committee which Ivan Rogers told us about
so its not much surprise that the whole thing was heading for a car crash - tomorrow we will get to Chequers and beyond.. meanwhile check out all these interviews and more in the @UKandEU#brexitwitnessarchiveukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness…
So - Chequers.. the big showdown... David Davis thought Johnson's intervention was not very impressive
his adviser @RaoulRuparel thought Davis was isolated
That may be why May's Chief of Staff @GavinBarwell thought the day had gone rather well
But Davis knew he had to go.. and he also knew that the big news would be whether Johnson followed him or not - so he had to decide how to handle that
so we embarked on the autumn of Chuck Chequers, the winter of failed Meaningful Votes and then May's departure and Johnson's ascent to the premiership. More on that soon. Meanwhile, check out @UKandEU#Brexitwitnessarchiveukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness…
@UKandEU Managed to break the thread - so now attached
Another day - remembering back to the leadership election of 2019. @DavidGauke told us why the Conservatives went for the by then unstoppable Boris Johnson
Brexit party chair Richard Tice told us how ABB - Anyone but Boris had changed post those disastrous (for the Conservatives) European elections - and "did for the Brexit party"
.@OwenPaterson claimed credit for Johnson's win for the ERG
we look at the idea of a net zero test which lots of people have recommended (see @CommonsEAC@theCCCuk - and indeed IfG). They can prompt reconsideration of policy - and help achieve policy coherence
But past experience suggests that mandatory tests get gamed; civil servants and ministers work out how to get round them; the need for equality assessments didn't stop Windrush. So useful - but not sufficient
I was going to write an open letter to @ChrisMasonBBC to congratulate him on his appointment.. but why write when you can tweet - so here goes.
well done Chris. This is an important big job. The BBC News is still the major news source for many of our fellow citizens. So its a job that needs doing well. Some thoughts.
First as @puzzlesthewill has said, its a big job. But its not the only job. The BBC has a lot of really good expert editors. Many stories would benefit if they led reporting the substance and the political take came later.
The PM's latest move must be an absolute nightmare for people who have to make the new moves work inside government.
Good that the PM has managed to bring back someone who knows him well as head of comms. Saves time building a relationship. His big challenge will be changing the defensive and misleading lines that No.10 have relied on - and got them into difficulty
In a strong position to stand up to the PM... to lose one (etc....) But the more intriguing moves are those of Barclay and Griffith. The Griffith moves has precedents - PM's brother headed the Cameron PU as a minister.
The Treasury will be pleased their energy compensation package avoided anything that might be consolidated into tax/benefits long-term - like a VAT cut or a UC increase. The Chancellor is worried about long-term public finance risks (rightly)
They have made a bet through their loan on long-term energy prices.. may or may not come back to bite them.
In its favour: its a lump sum. So it does not subsidise marginal consumption. And if you use energy to heat your sauna/swimming pool/mansion will be a lower proportion of your bill than in your poky flat/draughty 2-bed
Exhibit A - Operation Red Meat - throw out eye-catching policy announcements to "rally the backbenches". Policies should address real problems based on proper analysis, assembly of evidence and be well through through.
Policies are designed to change things. They cost public or private attention at a minimum, but more often divert resources - money, people, time. They need to be thought through and justified.