Detailed study in Nature last month of how Mayapan—the biggest Maya city in Yucatán in ~AD1100-1450—responded to a century of drought may provide insight into our own drought-plagued future. nature.com/articles/s4146… 1/18
Mayapan was the capital of a confederacy of smaller states, the most powerful Maya political entity at the time. It rose after the decline in ~900AD of the famous city-states in the southern Yucatán (e.g., Tikal). (map: Masson and Peraza Lope 2014) 2/18
The confederacy was ruled by a council of noble houses in fractious coalitions. Details are sketchy cuz every time a new coalition arose it rewrote the city’s history and put itself at the center. (Image of Mayapan stela by Linda Schele—the text was deliberately obliterated) 3/18
Also, the various houses had different religions and even different calendars. Because religion and the calendar governed state policy, the leadership was constantly infighting, Game of Thrones-style. (📷: Yucatan Tierra de Maravillas) 4/18
The confederacy was a dictatorship. The rulers forced commoners to work and collected the harvest of the surrounding maize fields, gardens, orchards, etc. (📷: Maya forest garden by Mesoamerican Research Center) 5/18
They supervised the construction of the massive 9-km wall around Mayapan and a network of broad roads and the mural-covered temples, halls, and shrines downtown. (maps: Proskouriakoff 1962; Maya Periphery Project) 6/18
In an innovation later matched by Louis XIV and the Tokugawa shogunate, elite families outside Mayapan were forced to live in the city so they could be watched. In other words, these folks were rough customers. 7/18
Two more notable features: 1) the Yucatán Peninsula is a big block of limestone w/o much
in the way of groundwater or rivers (one reason the Maya viewed cenotes [water holes in the limestone] as sacred locations). (📷: Eugene Kaspersky) 8/18
2) Mayapan had no centralized grain storage--Yucatán is hot and humid, so grain rots quickly. (Question: Ancient Rome, which was also hot and humid, had giant grain warehouses called horrea. Why didn't the Maya?) (📷: horrea on Tiber by maquettes-historique.net) 9/19
Around ~1340, the Nature paper sez, there's ~100 yrs of awful drought. The authors, Kennett et al., get this from tree rings and speleothems (formations like stalagmites and stalactites, which can trace past climate sorta-kinda like tree rings). (Image: Kennett et al 2022) 10/18
By combining this data with historical sources--Diego de Landa's 1566 history and the Chilam Balam of Mani--and archaeological studies of burials, the researchers can match historical events to drought periods. (Image: Kennett et al 2022) 11/18
In the first super-dry period, the late 1300s, they quickly start running out of food. The leadership responds--by waging a civil-war-ish fight for power between rival factions, in which the Xiu, the old bigwigs, are supplanted by the Cocom & their Canul mercenaries. 12/18
Xiu were burned, chopped to bits, even buried with knives still embedded in their bodies. Even in the language of a scientific report, it's pretty dramatic stuff. 12/18
After a few decades of stability, there’s a second severe dry period around 1450. The Xiu come back and massacre the Cocom, even killing their children. The battle tears up the city and leads to its near-total abandonment—a collapse. 13/18 (oops, messed up the numbering)
But note: the drought didn't *cause* the collapse. Rather, it was the failure of governing elites to respond. Instead of coordinating their efforts, they fought over their own status and privileges. 14/18
Note, too, that the Maya **themselves** didn't collapse. Instead the system reformed into a network of smaller, coastal towns with wetland areas that were good for agriculture. Ultimately the peninsula was split into 15-20 small states. 15/18
These states also went through decades of drought. But they were far better organized internally, and so they nonetheless thrived--until the ultimate calamity, Europeans, showed up in the early 1500s. 16/18 (Image: UK cover of my book, 1491 #shamelessplug)
The Yucatán drought was a “mega-drought” like the one we’re heading into in the North American West. Yucatán was one of the more densely packed urban places in the world at the time. Ultimately, the Maya survived and even thrived despite the drought. 17/18
The main problem they faced was not so much the drought itself, as their own political system. The “collapse” of Mayapan was entirely unnecessary. (My thanks to @pkedrosky for drawing this article to my attention.) 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, in Science Advances, a US-Canada team reported the bones of a “paleo-Indian” from ~12,800 yrs ago have a composition showing his diet was mostly mammoth. It’s a fine paper bearing on multiple long-festering archaeology disputes—but may not mean what they think. 1/23
Dispute #1: Researchers have fought about the “Paleolithic diet” since the ‘60s, when a big conference produced a classic book, Man the Hunter, that set off a zillion fights. The book cemented the image of early humans as small, egalitarian bands dominated by male hunters. 3/x
Interesting note from a pal: Indigenous voters--rarely polled--could tip the election in 5 of the 7 swing states. His countdown:
Wisconsin: 10 electoral votes. 5.9M people. 11 tribes, 147,000 members. In 2016, Clinton lost by ~12K votes. In 2020, Biden won by ~20K votes. 1/8
Michigan: 15 electoral votes. 10M+ people. 12 tribes w/ 242,000 members. Tiny reserves, so you can't see them well on maps. In 2016, Trump won by ~27,000 votes. In 2020, Biden by ~150,000 votes. 2/8
Nevada. 6 electoral votes, 3.2M people. 28 Indigenous nations, ~43,000 members. Biden won in 2020 by ~31,000, Clinton in 2016 by ~27,000. Note, though, isolation and poverty make it tough for natives even to get to the polls. 3/8
This, from a NY Times newsletter, is a bunch of important admissions about falsehoods spread by gov't and academia during the Covid epidemic. But I wish it went on to talk about how those falsehoods were, all too often, amplified by journalists, including those at the Times. 1/4
If history’s any guide, novel crises like the pandemic inevitably generate panic, lies, and power grabs by elites and wannabe elites. Too often, journos did not call BS on people who were loudly asserting things they couldn’t possibly know. Too many times, they took sides. 2/4
Crises also generate truly heroic behavior—think of hospital workers. And there were many news people who wrote terrific stuff under difficult conditions. But I'd argue some part of the crisis in trust we’re experiencing now is due to us hacks not telling people what we saw. 3/4
It is not only against the ignorant commoner with whom I contest: to defend all women comes to be the same as to offend almost all men, since rare is he that is not interested in building up his sex at the expense of the other.
Benito Jerónimo Feijoo, Defensa de la mujer (1726)
This 1726 book, written by a Spanish monk, was wildly popular and controversial in its day, with hundreds of books and feuilletons being written for and against its strikingly modern rationalist argument that women were the cognitive, social, and moral equal of men.
From what I can tell, it should be up there with Mill's Subjection of Women (1869) and the other early classics of this genre. If you're curious, the Spanish wikipedia article is way better than the English one. es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Je…
On three occasions I've written something for an outlet that made people very angry who had some power over the outlet—twice before publication, once after. (I mostly cover science, which typically doesn’t get this kind of reaction, but it happens.) 1/7
In the two before-publication cases, my article angered the publisher (in one) and a major advertiser (the other). Both times, my editors ran through what I was saying to make sure it was solid—then sent in their resignations. My pieces ran. 2/7 washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
The publisher in the one case blustered, but gave in. The advertiser in the other made good the threat to stop advertising, which hurt. But new advertisers stepped in, perhaps (who knows?) attracted by the publication’s rep for integrity. 3/7
New Science paper argues horses came to the Americas earlier than previously thought—a conclusion that, if it holds up, rewrites the history of the N. American West. Strikingly, the article is from a team of archaeologists, geneticists, and Lakota researchers and elders. 1/15
Both the findings and the collaboration are, in potential, a big deal. Let me explain why I think this. 2/ gifer.com/en/O3R
The standard story (repeated in, among other places, my own work) is horses originated in N America, went extinct there ~12K years ago (except remnants in Alaska), were reintroduced to the Americas via Spain's invasion, then spread into the West after the 1680 Pueblo Revolt. 3/15