Detailed study in Nature last month of how Mayapan—the biggest Maya city in Yucatán in ~AD1100-1450—responded to a century of drought may provide insight into our own drought-plagued future. nature.com/articles/s4146… 1/18
Mayapan was the capital of a confederacy of smaller states, the most powerful Maya political entity at the time. It rose after the decline in ~900AD of the famous city-states in the southern Yucatán (e.g., Tikal). (map: Masson and Peraza Lope 2014) 2/18
The confederacy was ruled by a council of noble houses in fractious coalitions. Details are sketchy cuz every time a new coalition arose it rewrote the city’s history and put itself at the center. (Image of Mayapan stela by Linda Schele—the text was deliberately obliterated) 3/18
Also, the various houses had different religions and even different calendars. Because religion and the calendar governed state policy, the leadership was constantly infighting, Game of Thrones-style. (📷: Yucatan Tierra de Maravillas) 4/18
The confederacy was a dictatorship. The rulers forced commoners to work and collected the harvest of the surrounding maize fields, gardens, orchards, etc. (📷: Maya forest garden by Mesoamerican Research Center) 5/18
They supervised the construction of the massive 9-km wall around Mayapan and a network of broad roads and the mural-covered temples, halls, and shrines downtown. (maps: Proskouriakoff 1962; Maya Periphery Project) 6/18
In an innovation later matched by Louis XIV and the Tokugawa shogunate, elite families outside Mayapan were forced to live in the city so they could be watched. In other words, these folks were rough customers. 7/18
Two more notable features: 1) the Yucatán Peninsula is a big block of limestone w/o much
in the way of groundwater or rivers (one reason the Maya viewed cenotes [water holes in the limestone] as sacred locations). (📷: Eugene Kaspersky) 8/18
2) Mayapan had no centralized grain storage--Yucatán is hot and humid, so grain rots quickly. (Question: Ancient Rome, which was also hot and humid, had giant grain warehouses called horrea. Why didn't the Maya?) (📷: horrea on Tiber by maquettes-historique.net) 9/19
Around ~1340, the Nature paper sez, there's ~100 yrs of awful drought. The authors, Kennett et al., get this from tree rings and speleothems (formations like stalagmites and stalactites, which can trace past climate sorta-kinda like tree rings). (Image: Kennett et al 2022) 10/18
By combining this data with historical sources--Diego de Landa's 1566 history and the Chilam Balam of Mani--and archaeological studies of burials, the researchers can match historical events to drought periods. (Image: Kennett et al 2022) 11/18
In the first super-dry period, the late 1300s, they quickly start running out of food. The leadership responds--by waging a civil-war-ish fight for power between rival factions, in which the Xiu, the old bigwigs, are supplanted by the Cocom & their Canul mercenaries. 12/18
Xiu were burned, chopped to bits, even buried with knives still embedded in their bodies. Even in the language of a scientific report, it's pretty dramatic stuff. 12/18
After a few decades of stability, there’s a second severe dry period around 1450. The Xiu come back and massacre the Cocom, even killing their children. The battle tears up the city and leads to its near-total abandonment—a collapse. 13/18 (oops, messed up the numbering)
But note: the drought didn't *cause* the collapse. Rather, it was the failure of governing elites to respond. Instead of coordinating their efforts, they fought over their own status and privileges. 14/18
Note, too, that the Maya **themselves** didn't collapse. Instead the system reformed into a network of smaller, coastal towns with wetland areas that were good for agriculture. Ultimately the peninsula was split into 15-20 small states. 15/18
These states also went through decades of drought. But they were far better organized internally, and so they nonetheless thrived--until the ultimate calamity, Europeans, showed up in the early 1500s. 16/18 (Image: UK cover of my book, 1491 #shamelessplug)
The Yucatán drought was a “mega-drought” like the one we’re heading into in the North American West. Yucatán was one of the more densely packed urban places in the world at the time. Ultimately, the Maya survived and even thrived despite the drought. 17/18
The main problem they faced was not so much the drought itself, as their own political system. The “collapse” of Mayapan was entirely unnecessary. (My thanks to @pkedrosky for drawing this article to my attention.) 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Modest proposal, occasioned by chats last night at a wedding with some smart, curious, well-educated 20-somethings: All high-school students should be required to take a course called How the System Works. 1/5
The course would have little political content. Instead it would focus on the physical systems that harvest and deliver drinking water, that generate and deliver energy (esp. electricity), that produce and distribute food, and the public-health system. 2/4
The overall theme: these systems, which required decades to create, are triumphs of the human mind and spirit, and it is the task of all of us to ensure that they are passed down to the next generation and improved. 3/5
I get what Dr Folta is saying here, but I think it's important to understand that two different things are going on. One is the question, "what is reasonable?" The second is the question, "what is right?" I believe Dr Folta misunderstands the relation between them. 1/9
Dr Folt is making a point about perceived risk, as he mentions here, in a reply to me. And he is 100% right about this, as far as I can tell. But that's not the sphere most people operate in.
A few days ago, a Spanish publisher (@capitanswing) released a Spanish translation of my book, “1491.” News coverage led to a small kerfluffle, with various people denouncing me online. They got mad because my book supposedly attacks the Spanish Conquest of the Americas. 1/7
@capitanswing The general thrust of the criticism is that the Conquest was justified – even that it was good for Indigenous Americans themselves. 2/7
@capitanswing Also, that there is somehow a secret and presumably large fund paying people like me to write books that they don’t like. 3/7
An extraordinary map: the areas in Canada in which their original inhabitants--First Nations, Inuit, and Metis, to be precise--have regained at least partial sovereignty. 1/10
A bit of explanation. In the 1970s, the Quebec provincial gov't decided to develop a huge hydropower project in the James Bay region to the north. Nobody asked the Cree and Inuit people who lived there. They didn't like that--and sued in 1972. 2/10
To the provincial governments' amazement, the court agreed with the Cree and Inuit. It told Quebec to stop building the dams. The Cree and Inuit treaties said that land taken from them--as the dams would do--had to be negotiated. Unhappily, Quebec came to the table. 3/10
While trying to figure how to translate the name of a kind of hat worn by the conquistadors, I came across David Carrasco's translation of Bernal Diaz's history of the conquest, and found a few paragraphs that sum up how most historians today think of Aztec human sacrifice.
I’d only add that the conquistadors almost never saw these rituals. Instead they saw Aztecs horribly killing (torturing, skinning alive, etc.) captured Spaniards to scare and intimidate them. But there’s little evidence that regular Aztec ceremonies were quite that sadistic.
Generally, public executions with ritual dismembering were common in the early modern world. Ming China did ghastly stuff, as did England. (Drawing of AD1380 public execution of imperial minister Hu Weiyong, slain with his whole family, all his employees, and their families.)
Readers of 1491 tell me they're surprised by archaeologists' resistance to claims—like this one, from 2020—that the Americas were settled >20K yrs ago based on fragments of stone tools. In part, that skepticism descends from earlier fights. 1/18
One big example: In the 1880s Benjamin Harrison, a grocer and amateur archaeologist, claimed he found ~5 million yr old “stone tools”—chunks of chipped flint—in Kent. They were dubbed “eoliths” (Greek "eos", dawn, and "lithos", stone). (Cyril Chitty 📷 Maidstone Museum) 2/
Eoliths were 1st found in France in 1867, but Harrison brought them most to world attention. Idea was that Paleolithic stone axes were known to exist, so there must be simpler forms. The not-so-tool-like look of eoliths "proved" they were genuine. (Harrison drawing of eoliths) 3/