Alright -- last one from me on this SK/ECCC water incident. @CTVNews reached out. I told them the weekend amendment to the Trespass to Property Regs -- which now define "persons" as "the Crown in right of Canada" -- was meaningless pandering: regina.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=2… 1/n #skpoli
From the clip, it appears that CTV reached out to Scott Moe's office for his response re: whether the amendment actually changed anything. To which they responded as follows: 2/n
[excuse me for a moment] 3/n
Section 17 of the Trespass to Property Act sets out who is exempt. That list is pretty clear -- and it doesn't include the kind of inspection/testing that set this whole fiasco in motion. Even if it did, Moe's weekend amendment makes no relevant change to that section! 4/n
Indeed, as my colleague @BankesNigel pointed out to me, while unnecessary the amendment actually helps the feds b/c it makes abundantly clear that a "person...acting under a right or authority conferred by law" includes "the Crown in right of Canada," i.e. federal inspectors. 5/n
[excuse me for one more moment] 6/n
What to make of all of this? 1st, the golden rule: haste makes waste. 2nd, @PremierScottMoe & his crew are either painfully incompetent or recklessly cynical (& don't think very highly of their constituents). None of this is good for the fine people of the province I grew up in.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Folks, I think I figured out why the GoA and O&G pundits are so upset about the changes to the Competition Act (re: #greenwashing) — a big clue lies in the wreckage of Jason Kenney & Steve Allan’s infamous Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns: 1/n 🧵 #cdnpoli #ableg
First, let’s take a moment to appreciate that the gov’t that brought you the least transparent (no public hearings, no publication of interviewees or their evidence) inquiry, that equated environmentalism w/ disloyalty, is now using terms like “gag order” & “Orwellian”. 2/n
But the clue lies in what the Allan Inquiry desperately avoided doing: fact-checking eNGO claims.
Think about that. The GoA explicitly hands you a mandate to tackle “radical eco views” & alleged “disinformation” about O&G and you — turn that opportunity down? 🤨 3/n
Ugh, I hate to ask like this but can folks ‘like’ & RT the sh!t out of Ryan’s tweet so that there is no doubt that we want him to ask her clear & pointed questions re: the O&G sector’s hundred *BILLION* dollar liability problem? #ableg
Questions like:
- how is it in anyway acceptable for the AER to deliberately withhold information from Albertans about the true scope & severity of the problem — for years now: calgaryherald.com/business/energ…
Or:
- how is it in anyway acceptable that the Auditor General raised significant concerns about the Mine Financial Security Program (MFSP — for oil sands mines) in 2015, and then again in 2021, that have yet to be addressed — in 2024?
Important thread re: the shortage of physicians coming to AB. Elections do indeed have consequences -- across the board. And I wholeheartedly agree that this election may be the most consequential in decades. #ableg
When I came to AB 10 yrs ago, my focus was firmly on enviro law & policy. That's still a dumpster fire, but I'm increasingly preoccupied w/ more basic stuff, esp. the rule of law. From the Allan Inquiry to the Sovereignty Act, we've seen ⬆️ attacks on basic democratic norms.
When Danielle Smith became front runner for the UCP, I warned that conservatives were on the verge of electing a wanna-be tyrant. As I made clear then, I was referring to Smith's already apparent disdain for any limits or constraints on her power:
Apparently, Steve Allan is not sufficiently embarrassed of his role in the circus that was the Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta energy campaigns, so here are some reminders #ableg! 1/4
The 1st is an excerpt from his own Rules of Procedure, which make abundantly clear that he has ZERO business lecturing anyone on transparency: secret interviews, slicing & dicing the public record at whim, omitting relevant evidence re: oil sands' enviro performance: 2/4
And then the mere fact that he blew $100K on tripe from Barry Cooper, Tammy Nemeth & the American Petroleum Institute: cbc.ca/news/canada/ed…. 3/4
I am not even going to bother threading this thing because it would be 20 tweets long and still wouldn't cut it. It is regulatory capture or systemic incompetence -- take your pick.
I mean, come on -- how many years have to go by before you say to yourself: this is not working.
Alright, monster 🧵 re: oil sands liabilities (remediation & reclamation costs) & why it's currently more likely than not that Albertans will be stuck holding the >$130 billion bill & First Nations will inherent a permanently scarred landscape: edmonton.ctvnews.ca/first-nations-… 1/10 #ableg
Last year, AB Env. & Protected Areas (AEP) & the AB Energy Regulator (AER) launched a review of the Mine Financial Security Program (MFSP) that is supposed to protect Albertans from the remediation & reclamation costs associated w/ oil sands mining: google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j… 2/n
Key to understanding the MFSP is that it's a misnomer. It does not collect security (cash/line of credit) to ensure eventual clean-up; it's designed to do the opposite -- to allow cos to avoid posting security (green area ⤵️) by relying on assets (oil reserves) in the ground. 3/n