A brief thread on #mammals that are are alive today but were first described as #fossils.... 1/n
Goosebeak or Cuvier’s beaked #whale (#Ziphius cavirostris): described as a fossil in 1823 but realised in 1872 to be the same as beached specimens reported in 1820s but given different names. Ziphius is near-globally distributed (pics: specimens from Bay of Biscay; NOAA) 2/n
Bush dog (Speothos venaticus): named as a fossil in 1839 - which explains Speothos, meaning ‘cave wolf’ - and described alive 1843. The same person, Danish naturalist Peter Wilhelm Lund, described the fossil AND living animals, but ... 3/n (pics Attis; Bonne1978; CC BY-SA 3.0)
... failed to realise they were the same thing: he named the living animals Icticyon, and this name was for used for #Speothos until well into the 20th century. For more on Speothos and its affinities, biology and conservation, see ... tetzoo.com/blog/2022/1/5/…#dogs#mammals 4/n
False killer whale (#Pseudorca crassidens): described as a fossil by Owen in 1846 for a skull found in the Lincolnshire Fens of east England, but then discovered as a modern animal thanks to strandings of 1861 and 1862 [pics PD; Juan Ortega, CC BY-SA 3.0] 5/n #whales#cetaceans
Mountain pygmy possum (#Burramys parvus): described from bones preserved in #Pleistocene owl pellets in 1896 by Broom, and immediately noted for its distinctive teeth. Found alive in a ski lodge in the Australian Alps in 1966. Only extant member of its clade (Burramyidae) 6/n
Chacoan #peccary (Catagonus wagneri): named as a fossil by Rusconi in 1930; recognised as a living species in Argentina in 1974 (but already known to local people as Tagua). Some experts argue that it should be renamed Parachoerus wagneri. 7/n [pics Gasparini et al. 2017; PD]
Bulmer’s fruit bat (Aproteles bulmerae): described 1977 from New Guinea as a fossil, reported from modern bones in 1980, then discovered alive. The one colony then mostly eradicated by hunters. Of uncertain status; possibly persisting. Pics from EDGE: edgeofexistence.org/species/bulmer… 8/n
#Floresomys naso, a fossil murid #rodent from #Flores named by Musser in 1981. The generic name was preoccupied by a fossil sciuravid rodent, so later renamed Paulamys naso. A live individual was reported in 1991. One of many endemic Flores murids (pic: Veatch et al. 2019) 9/n
In 1887 Herluf Winge described fossil #murids from the Brazilian Lagoa Santa caves: among them was the new species Scapteromys labiosus. This species, now referred to the crimson-nosed rat genus Bibimys, was reported alive in 1980. B. labiosus pic from Gonçalves et al. 2005. 10/n
Hesperomys simplex was another fossil murid described from the Lagoa Santa caves by Winge in 1887, but also reported by him as occurring in modern-day owl pellets, and thus still be alive. A Paraguayan #murid named Oryzomys wavrini was described in 1921, aaaand... 11/n
..... was shown by Voss & Myers (1991) to be the same thing as Hesperomys simplex, the name currently used for this taxon is Pseudoryzomys simplex. It’s sometimes called the ratos-do-mato or Brazilian false rice rat. I wrote about rice rats here ... web.archive.org/web/2017030823… 12/n
FINALLY, a living #rodent from Uruguay and Brazil, described in 1955 as Holochilus magnus, was shown by Voss & Carleton (1993) to be the same thing as another #Pleistocene fossil species named by Winge in 1887, Hesperomys molitor (image from Voss & Carleton 1993). But... 13/n
.... restudy showed that it was distinct from both Holochilus (the semiaquatic web-footed rats) and Hesperomys (nowadays synonymous with Calomys, the vesper mice) and deserving of its own genus, so today it's Lundomys molitor. Here's a pic of a live one... flickr.com/photos/rothfau…
FINALLY FINALLY: this is not a complete list nor intended to be :) It's mostly a recycling of material I prepared for an article published in 2006.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, it's time another #TetZoocryptomegathread. In previous megathreads, I've covered several #LochNessMonster photos, including Hugh Gray's from 1933, Peter O'Connor's of 1960, and the Shiels 'muppet' of 1977. Time for another one!
Yes, you've heard of the #LochNessMonster, but maybe you don't know that a key piece of evidence long used to support its reality was a grainy bit of cine film, taken in 1960 by an aeronautical engineer from Reading in southern England…
This thread might be the longest and most complex so far, so hold tight. As ever, remember that I cover both sceptical and 'pro-monster' takes on the case concerned. The case I'm referring to concerns Tim Dinsdale's Foyers Bay footage of April 1960...
For something like four decades, Dr Alan Feduccia of the University of North Carolina has been arguing that everyone is wrong about #dinosaurs. His newest book is Romancing the Birds and Dinosaurs: Forays in Postmodern Paleontology. Here's a quick thread on its contents... 1/n
The book - RTBAD from hereon - is not an instruction manual for palaeozoophiles (art by @Book_Rat), nor does it include homage or reference to the 1984 movie Romancing the Stone. Rather, it’s composed of 23 essays on the state of dinosaur science as Feduccia sees it today... 2/n
@Book_Rat Early parts of RTBAD express Feduccia's disapproval of the power-hungry, juvenile popularists of our age. Some "have Twitter accounts with large followers [sic], dealing with everything from paleontological discoveries to sports and politics!" I'm among this awful lot ... 3/n
Welcome to a somewhat overdue (mega)thread devoted to the @AppleTV / @bbcstudios series #PrehistoricPlanet season 2 (#prehistoricplanet2 if you will), streaming NOW, and specifically to the first episode: ISLANDS...
Islands is one of my favourite episodes of #PrehistoricPlanet2. We knew early on that we’d cover stories relevant to the Late Cretaceous island faunas of Romania and Madagascar (since both places have revealed numerous amazing Late Cretaceous island-dwelling animals), but…
... what else could we show? The producer for this episode – Paul Stewart – worked really hard to find appropriate stories, and succeeded in focusing on amazing animals doing interesting things…
If you're interested in science you're familiar with Piltdown man, formally named Eoanthropus dawsoni in 1912 but shown to be hoaxed in 1953. What you may not be familiar with is the DUALIST CONTENTION, and here's a thread on it...
Yes, the one thing that every single person who’s heard of Piltdown man knows is that it was eventually determined to be a hoax. What’s discussed less frequently is that early 20th century views on Piltdown man were -far more complex- than popularly portrayed...
Acceptance of Eoanthropus as a valid proto-human (as per the Margaret Flinsch illustration here) might have been the 'mainstream' view that made it into textbooks and encyclopedias, but it certainly wasn’t the only one, nor was this acceptance wholesale or uncontroversial...
In 1967, the #DSRV#Alvin was attached by a #swordfish at a depth of c 600m. The swordfish charged the vessel at speed and got virtually the whole of its rostrum embedded in Alvin's hull. The fish survived ascent to the surface but was killed and eaten. Cont...
#Swordfish (and other billfishes) have often rammed large objects at speed - their broken rostra have been recovered from ship hulls, turtle shells and baleen whale heads. In 2016, one rammed a diver doing maintenance on a Brazilian oil platform and impaled his air tank...
A 2021 study by Patrick Jambura et al. described a case in which a dead Bigeye thresher shark was discovered with a partial #swordfish rostrum embedded in its gill region. You can read that study here... link.springer.com/article/10.100…